Skip to main content

Imaging Criteria for Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging in Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The evaluation of the tumor response to therapy represents a significant and continuously expanding part of the radiological practice, especially in services with oncological departments. The modern imaging modalities are valuable tools for objective quantitative assessment of the result of new antineoplastic therapeutic schemes. The standardization of criteria provides common endpoints for clinical trials, permits comparisons between different studies, facilitates the formation of more effective therapies, and accelerates the procedure of approval of new drugs by the authorized organizations. The most widely used imaging criterion of a successful therapy is the shrinkage of the neoplastic lesions in a certain patient. It represents the typical endpoint in phase II trials, targeted to the preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of new antineoplastic drugs in order to decide if these have to be further tested in wider clinical studies. Also, the objective criterion of “tumor shrinkage” and the duration of “progression free survival” (PFS) represent the commonest endpoints for phase III clinical trials, aiming to assess the benefit of applying one or more therapeutic schemes in specific patient populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization (1979) WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Publication No. 48. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (RECIST Guidelines). J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade glioma: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28911:1963–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME et al (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 10:579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Persijn MEL, Gelberblom H (2010) RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline. Eur Radiol 20(6):1456–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishino M, Jagganathan JP, Ramayia NH et al (2010) Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: what oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chalian H, Tore HG, Horowitz JM et al (2011) Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics 31:2093–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mantatzis M, Kakolyris S, Amarantidis K et al (2009) Treatment response classification of liver metastatic disease evaluated on imaging: are RECIST unidimensional measurements accurate? Eur Radiol 19(7):1809–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nowak AK, Armato SG III, Ceresoli GL et al (2010) Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: a review of imaging research presented at the 9th international meeting of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer 70(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50:122S–150S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desar IM, van Herpen CM, van Laarhoven HW et al (2009) Beyond RECIST: molecular and functional imaging techniques for evaluation of response to targeted therapies. Cancer Treat Rev 35(4):309–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkadios Chr. Rousakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rousakis, A.C., Andreou, J.A. (2018). Imaging Criteria for Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68872-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68873-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics