Skip to main content

Demographic Aging and Employment Dynamics in German Regions: Modeling Regional Heterogeneity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Modelling Aging and Migration Effects on Spatial Labor Markets

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Persistence of high youth unemployment and dismal labour market outcomes are imminent concerns for most European economies. The relationship between demographic ageing and employment outcomes is even more worrying once the relationship is scrutinized at the regional level. We focus on modelling regional heterogeneity. We argue that an average impact across regions is often not very useful, and that—conditional on the region’s characteristics—impacts may differ significantly. We advocate the use of modelling varying level and slope effects, and specifically to cluster them by the use of latent class or finite mixture models (FMMs). Moreover, in order to fully exploit the output from the FMM, we adopt self-organizing maps to understand the composition of the resulting segmentation and as a way to depict the underlying regional similarities that would otherwise be missed if a standard approach was adopted. We apply our proposed method to a case-study of Germany where we show that the regional impact of young age cohorts on the labor market is indeed very heterogeneous across regions and our results are robust against potential endogeneity bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1036, Accessed on September 23rd, 2016.

  2. 2.

    One can apply second-stage models, where the first stage estimates the fixed effects and the second stage analyses the determinants of those fixed effects. However, note again, that this is only an analysis on the levels and not on the slopes.

  3. 3.

    Interestingly, the underlying algorithm and implementation where only the constants α c are allowed to vary over groups is heavily applied in labour economics by, e.g., Lancaster (1992), Munch et al. (2006), and De Graaff and Van Leuvensteijn (2013), usually in a multivariate setting where the constants α c are then argued to remove unobserved heterogeneity.

  4. 4.

    For a detailed explanation of the underlying learning mechanism and its implementation, please refer to Kohonen (2001) The analysis in this paper was carried out using the kohonen library in the statistical software platform R (Wehrens et al. 2007).

  5. 5.

    Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics.

  6. 6.

    The particular measure we employ reads as:

    $$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \hat{L}_{rt}=\sum_k \left[\frac{E_{k,t}}{E_{k,t-1}} E_{rk,t-1}\right], \end{aligned} $$
    (11.10)

    where \(\hat {L}\) is the weighted sum of employment across all sectors k in region r in and year t − 1, with the weights being given by the rate of sector-specific employment in year t and year t − 1 at the national level. As such, this variable represents the level of employment in region r that is predicted for the case in which employment in each sector grows at the same rate as the corresponding sector at the national level indicated by E. This variable is used as an exogenous measure for demand changes for labour.

  7. 7.

    Because of strong temporal autocorrelation in both the employment rates and the youth shares, we estimate model (11.2) by applying first differencing. Thus, we estimate: \(\ln (E_{r,t})- \ln (E_{r,t-1}) = \beta _1 (\ln (YS_{r,t})-\ln (YS_{r,t-1})) + (\epsilon _{r,t}-\epsilon _{r,t-1})\). Although less efficient than the usual within estimator, first differencing requires less strong identification assumptions. For the linear model, this should only affect the standard errors and indeed, both fixed effects estimation strategies lead to similar results. It matters however for the clustering analysis.

  8. 8.

    Sander (2014) points out that the internal migration patterns in Germany have been predominantly within East Germany, while significant trends to urban cores from nearby suburban areas as well as metropolitan hinterlands during our study period. At the same time young adults with families out-migrated to urban agglomerations in many non-metropolitan cities. We expect that using labour market areas which includes daily commuting patterns and FMM for our analysis to some extent should tackle with potential bias internal migration patterns might cause.

References

  • Alfo M, Trovato G, Waldmann RJ (2008) Testing for country heterogeneity in growth models using a finite mixture approach. J Appl Econ 23(4):487–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono P, Jones JB (2003) Finite mixture distributions, sequential likelihood and the em algorithm. Econometrica 71(3):933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagi F, Lucifora C (2008) Demographic and education effects on unemployment in europe. Labour Econ 15(5):1076–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom DE, Freeman RB, Korenman SD (1988) The labour-market consequences of generational crowding. Eur J Popul 3(2):131–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Graaff T, Van Leuvensteijn M (2013) A european cross-country comparison of the impact of homeownership and transaction costs on job tenure. Reg Stud 47(9):1443–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb P, Trivedi PK et al (1997) Demand for medical care by the elderly: a finite mixture approach. J Appl Econ 12(3):313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 39:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote CL (2007) Space and time in macroeconomic panel data: young workers and state-level unemployment revisited

    Google Scholar 

  • Garloff A, Pohl C, Schanne N (2013) Do small labor market entry cohorts reduce unemployment? Demogr Res 29:379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp Res B Methodol 37(8):681–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer series in information sciences, vol 30. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenman S, Neumark D (2000) Cohort crowding and youth labor markets: a cross-national analysis, number January, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosfeld R, Werner D-ÖA (2012), Deutsche arbeitsmarktregionen–neuabgrenzung nach den kreisgebietsreformen 2007–2011. Raumforsch Raumordn 70(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster T (1992) The econometric analysis of transition data, vol 17. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat J, Roth D (2013) The cohort size-wage relationship in europe, technical report. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung)

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch JR, Rosholm M, Svarer M (2006) Are homeowners really more unemployed? Econ J 116(514):991–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander N (2014) Internal migration in germany, 1995–2010: new insights into east-west migration and re-urbanisation. Comp Popul Stud 39(2):217–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimer R (2001) The impact of young workers on the aggregate labor market. Q J Econ 116:969–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skans ON (2005) Age effects in Swedish local labor markets. Econ Lett 86:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman S, Folch DC (2015) Chapter 9. Social area analysis and self-organizing maps. In: Brunsdon C, Singleton A (eds) Geocomputation: a practical primer. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 152–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2003) Introduction to econometrics, vol 104. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel M, Kamakura WA (2012) Market segmentation: conceptual and methodological foundations, vol 8. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrens R, Buydens LM et al (2007) Self-and super-organizing maps in r: the kohonen package. J Stat Softw 21(5):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Thill J-C (2009) Visual data mining in spatial interaction analysis with self-organizing maps. Environ Plann B Plann Des 36(3):466–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Daniel Arribas-Bel and Ceren Ozgen gratefully acknowledge research funding by “Population Ageing and Regional Labour Market Development” project. An edited version of the paper will appear in Modelling Aging and Migration Effects on Spatial Labor Markets book by Springer-Verlag.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas de Graaff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Graaff, T.d., Arribas-Bel, D., Ozgen, C. (2018). Demographic Aging and Employment Dynamics in German Regions: Modeling Regional Heterogeneity. In: R. Stough, R., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Blien, U. (eds) Modelling Aging and Migration Effects on Spatial Labor Markets. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68563-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics