Skip to main content

Future Evidence in Forensic Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
P5 Medicine and Justice

Abstract

The idea that the traditional autopsy can no longer be considered the “gold standard” and should be combined with or replaced, if necessary, by the radiological study (post-mortem cross sectional imaging—PMCSI) is slowly gaining ground, despite the presence of opposing currents thought. To encourage the application of PMCSI it is necessary to concentrate resources in three key areas: (1) Research, to improve its incisiveness, reducing its costs and keeping in mind possible applications in clinical settings; (2) formation of a “necroradiologist”, with guaranteed specialist skills in the interpretation of radiological images of cadavers; (3) achievement of the standard, to ensure the quality of the results and give credibility to a still vulnerable field exposed to possible errors with catastrophic repercussions on its development and on the judiciary system. In the near future PMCSI will become the praxis in the study of the cadaver; however, for this purpose, it is necessary to promote research and a hyper-specialized training, to ensure the quality of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kranz P, Holtas S (1983) Post-mortem computed tomography in a diving fatality. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:132–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffery A, Morgan B, Raj V, West K, Rutty GN (2011) The criminal justice system’s considerations of so-called near-virtual autopsies: the East Midlands experience. J Clin Path 64:711–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutty J, Morgan B, Rutty GN (2015) Managing transformational change: Implementing cross-sectional imaging into death investigation services in the United Kingdom. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 1(3):57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutty GN, Rutty JE (2011) Perceptions of near virtual autopsies. J Forensic Leg Med 18:306–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutty GN (2007) Are autopsies necessary? The role of computed tomography as a possible alternative to invasive autopsies. Rechtsmedizin 17(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutty GN, Duerden RM, Carter N, Clark JC (2001) Are coroner’s autopsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a ‘view and grant’ system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales. J Clin Path 54:279–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Biggs MJ, Brown LJ, Rutty GN (2008) Can cause of death be predicted from the pre-necropsy information provided in coroners’ cases? J Clin Path 61:124–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutty GN, Morgan B, O’Donnell C, Leth PM, Thali M (2008) Forensic institutes across the world place CT or MRI scanners or both into their mortuaries. J Trauma 65:493–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan B, Sakamoto N, Shiotani S, Grabherr S (2014) Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scanning with angiography (PMCTA): A description of three distinct methods. In: Rutty GN (ed) Essential of autopsy practice: Advances, Updates and Emerging Technologies, 1st edn. Springer, London, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutty GN, Morgan B, Germerott T, Thali M, Athurs O (2016) Ventilated post-mortem computed tomography—A historical review. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging 4:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Donchin Y, Rivkind AI, Bar-Ziv J, Hiss J, Almog J, Drescher M (1994) Utility of postmortem computed tomography in trauma victims. J Trauma 37(4):552–555, discussion 555–556

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rutty GN, Brogdon G, Dedouit F, Grabherr S, Hatch GM, Jackowski C, Leth P, Persson A, Ruder TD, Shiotani S, Takahashi N, Thali MJ, Woźniak K, Yen K, Morgan B (2013) Terminology used in publications for post-mortem cross-sectional imaging. Int J Legal Med 127:465–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruder TD, Thali YA, Rashid SNA, Mund MT, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, Christensen AM, Somaini S, Ampanozi G (2016) Validation of post mortem dental CT for disaster victim identification. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 5:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brough AL, Morgan B, Robinson C, Black S, Cunningham C, Adams C, Rutty GN (2014) A minimum data set approach to post-mortem computed tomography reporting for anthropological biological profiling. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:504–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutty GN, Morgan B (2015) Cross sectional imaging and the post-mortem interval. In: Madea B (ed) Estimation of the Time Since Death, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 269–275

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan B, Rutty GN (2016) How does post-mortem imaging compare to autopsy, is this a relevant question? J Forensic Radiol Imaging 4:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol 50:513–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasahara S, Makino Y, Hayakawa M, Yajima D, Ito H, Iwase H (2012) Diagnosable and non-diagnosable causes of death by postmortem computed tomography: a review of 339 forensic cases. Leg Med (Tokyo) 14:239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bedford PJ (2012) Routine CT scan combined with preliminary examination as a new method in determining the need for autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8:390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bisset RA, Thomas NB, Turnbull IW, Lee S (2002) Postmortem examinations using magnetic resonance imaging: Four year review of a working service. BMJ 324(7351):1423–1424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wichmann D, Obbelode F, Vogel H, Hoepker WW, Nierhaus A, Braune S, Sauter G, Pueschel K, Kluge S (2012) Virtual autopsy as an alternative to traditional medical autopsy in the intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 156:123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: A validation study. Lancet 379(9811):136–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, Wade A, Skordis-Worrall J, Bennett-Britton I, Cohen M, Withby E, Sebire NJ, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 75:e142–e148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Robinson CE, Rutty GN (2011) Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: Proof of concept. Int J Legal Med 125(4):609–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross SG, Thali MJ, Bolliger S, Germerott T, Ruder TD, Flach PM (2012) Sudden death after chest pain: Feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT angiography and biopsy. Radiology 264(1):250–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Adnan A, Robinson C, Biggs M, Joseph S, Morgan B, Rutty GN, Adlam D (2016) Optical coherence tomography of re-pressurised porcine coronary arteries: A systematic study. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 4:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson C, Adnan A, Adlam D, Biggs M, Rutty G, Morgan B (2016) Measuring pressure during coronary artery angiography in ex-vivo hearts. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 4:58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rutty GN, Swift B (2004) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology 44:187–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. http://www.virtopsy.com/wordpress/cas. Accessed Apr 2016

  30. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/emfpu/courses. Accessed Apr 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy N. Rutty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rutty, G.N., Morgan, B. (2017). Future Evidence in Forensic Imaging. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics