Skip to main content

Assessing the Absorptive Capacity of Regional Innovation Systems: A Case Study of Lithuanian Regions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Absorptive capacity is considered a main precondition for regional innovativeness. However, each region is unique, and analyzing its innovativeness requires an appropriate methodology. Within scientific discussion on the concept of the “region”, most of the scientific research analyzing absorptive capacity tends to be conducted for large or highly developed regions. Small countries (such as Lithuania) are considered indivisible regional units; therefore, there is still a lack of research to provide specific tools that could be adapted to assess regional absorptive capacity in a small country. Taking this into consideration, this chapter’s objective is to present a methodology for assessing RIS absorptive capacity that has been adapted to the context of regions in a small country (Lithuania). Its goals are as follows: (1) to explain the concept of absorptive capacity in the context of a RIS; (2) to provide the theoretical background for assessing absorptive capacity; (3) to present a methodology for assessing absorptive capacity in a small country (Lithuania); and (4) to explain the main results of the research, which was conducted for RIS in Lithuania using the methodology presented here. The scientific research methods used were an analysis of scientific literature, statistical analysis, and the SAW multiple criteria method. The research revealed that regions in a small country differ in their various indicators of absorptive capacity. Using the appropriate tool for assessment can also be a tool for identifying a region’s strong and weak points as well as for promoting or interfering with the absorption of external knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    NUTS are a common classification of territorial units for EU regional statistics. Lithuania is classified as a NUTSII region. All information concerned with innovations is collected at the country level without distinguishing regional indicators.

  2. 2.

    Regions classified as NUTSIII have a population of 150,000–800,000 inhabitants, and their area must range within 10–83.5 thousand km2. All ten of Lithuania’s counties are classified as NUTSIII regions (Commission Regulation… 2014).

  3. 3.

    The method of criteria selection is used to verify and identify the sample in the population by selecting units according to a set of criteria that has been determined by the authors. This method is useful when the population is quite big and researchers wish to compare results.

  4. 4.

    There were assumptions concerning the regional dimension that were made in order to formulate certain indicators (to calculate their numerical estimates). However, it is possible to discard these assumptions and to calculate more accurately in the case of access to more detailed information sources that can provide detailed statistics for the small country’s regions.

  5. 5.

    All statistical data for the paper was acquired from two institutions—Statistics Lithuania (a government institution that collects, analyzes, and publishes statistical data and reports on the country’s industrial, commercial, financial, social, etc. activities and the environment) and the State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania (a government institution that implements the legalization and state protection of industrial property (inventions, designs, brands, typography, etc.) and the functions of the central industrial property office within the EU and the European Patent Organization). For the first source, databases and direct communication with the institution’s staff were used to get the necessary statistics. For the second, official monthly bulletins were analyzed.

  6. 6.

    A polynomial trend function is a suitable tool for calculating missing estimates when numerical data with some fluctuations has been provided. Missing estimates are calculated (predicted) according to the value of the statistical data series’ coefficient of determination (R2). The prediction is more targeted when R2 is closer the value of 1 (R2 > 0.65 for this calculation and predicting the missing estimates in this paper).

References

  • Abreu M, Grinevich V, Kitson M, Savona M (2009) Absorptive capacity and regional patterns of innovation. Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Autant-Bernard C, Fadairo M, Massard N (2013) Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Res Policy 42(1):196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman E, Usai S (2009) Knowledge diffusion in European regions. IAREG Deliv 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitinas B (2006) Edukologinių tyrimų metodologiniai vingiai (Methodological turns of educational research). Pedagogika = Pedagogy 83:9–15 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (2016) Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Ind Innov 23(2):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneckienė J, Kilijonienė A (2011) Lietuvos regionų konkurencingumo klasterinė analizė (Cluster analysis of regional competitiveness in Lithuania). Manag Theory Stud Rural Bus Infrastruct Dev 1(25):60–69 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneckienė J, Krušinskas R (2011) ES struktūrinės paramos įtakos Lietuvos regionų plėtrai ir išsivystymo netolygumams mažinti vertinimas (Evaluation of EU structural support for enhancement the development and diminishing the disparities of Lithuania’s regions). Ekonomika ir vadyba = Econ and Manag 16:127–136 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucar B (1995) International cooperation of European subnational regions. In: Paper prepared for the ECSA annual conference, May 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo LL, Salem DS, Guasch JL (2012) Innovative and absorptive capacity of international knowledge: an empirical analysis of productivity sources in Latin American countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade C (2011) Are knowledge bases enough? a comparative study of the geography of knowledge sources in China (great Beijing) and India (Pune). Eur Plan Stud 19(7):1357–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Regulation (EU) No 868/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (2014) Off J Eur Union, 13.08.2014, L241/1–L241/54

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugirdas V, Mačiulytė J (2006) Decentralizacija ir teritorinė savivalda Lietuvoje (Decentralisation and autonomy for local government authorities in Lithuania). Politologija = Polit Sci 3(43):91–110 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring T, Schnellenbach J (2004) What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Res Notes Work Pap Ser 14:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois A, Hedin S, Schmitt P, Sterling J (2009) EU macro-regions and macro-regional strategies

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H (2007) University-industry-government: the Triple Helix model of innovation. In: Proceedings of 51-st EOQ congress. European Organization of Quality, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Tripple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy 29(2):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (2002) Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – complementarity and economic growth. Res Policy 2(31):191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu X (2008) Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: evidence from China. VII OECD Global Forum on International Investment

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginevičius R, Podvezko V (2008a) Daugiakriterinio vertinimo būdų suderinamumas (The problem of compatibility of various multiple criteria evaluation methods). Verslas: teorija ir praktika = Bus Theory Pract 9(1):73–80 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginevičius R, Podvezko V (2008b) Daugiakriterinio vertinimo taikymo galimybės kiekybiniam socialinių reiškinių vertinimui (A feasibility study of multicriteria methods’ application to quantitative evaluation of social phenomena). Verslas: teorija ir praktika = Bus Theory Pract 9(2):81–87 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Pernía JL, Peña-Legazkue I, Vendrell-Herrero F (2012) Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level. Small Bus Econ 39(3):561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkier H, Dahlström M, James L, Manniche J, Olsen LS (2010) Knowledge dynamics, regional development and public policy. Aalborg University, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders H, Tarantela St (2011) Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010 – methodology report

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders H, Derbyshire J, Lewney R, Tijssen R, Tarantela St, Leon LR (2012) Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012. Methodology report

    Google Scholar 

  • Horibe F (2016) Creating the innovation culture: leveraging visionaries, dissenters, and other useful troublemakers in your organization. VisionArts Inc, Marshalltown

    Google Scholar 

  • Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013 (2013) European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Iszák K, Griniene E (2012) Innovation policy in 2012 – challenges, trends and responses. Produced under the specific contract for the integration of the INNO Policy TrendChart with ERAWATCH (2011-2012). European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Iszák K, Markianidou P, Radošević S (2013) Lessons from a decade of innovation policy. What can be learnt from the INNO Policy TrendChart and The Innovation Union Scoreboard. Final report, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucevičius R, Sutkus A, Šajeva S, Kleinauskė K (2011) Inovacijų sistemos žinių absorbcinis gebėjimas: sektorinė ir institucinė perspektyva (ISAG) (Knowledge absorptive capacity in an innovation system: the sector and institutional perspective). Final report, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucevičius R, Juknevičienė V, Mikolaitytė J, Šaparnienė D (2017) Assessing the regional innovation system’s absorptive capacity: the approach of a smart region in a small country. Systems 5(27):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Juknevičienė V (2015) Regioninės inovacijų sistemos absorbcinio gebėjimo vystymas (Development of regional innovation system’s absorptive capacity). Doctoral Dissertation, Kaunas University of Technology (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Juozaitienė V, Juozaitis A, Kerzienė S (2011) Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija, statistinės analizės metodai ir priemonės (Research methodology, statistical analysis and measures). Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio A, Karmaakorpi V, Pihkala T (2010) Absorptive capacity and social capital in regional innovation systems: the case of the Lahti region in Finland. Urban Stud 47(2):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareivaitė R (2012) Daugiakriterių metodų panaudojimas vertinant darnų vystymąsi (The use of multi-criteria methods to evaluate sustainable development). J Manag 1(20):121–127 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirstukas J, Rakštys R, Serva E, Vaznonis B (2013) Inovacijų ir techninių pokyčių ekonomika (Economy of innovation and technical change). Akademija, Kaunas (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriaučionienė M (2008) INNO-Policy TrendChart – policy trends and appraisal reports. European Commission, Lithuania

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2002) A thematic analysis and critical assessment of absorptive capacity research. Acad Manag Proc M1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff L (2012) The Triple Helix of university-industry-government

    Google Scholar 

  • Lithuania’s Progress Strategy “Lithuania 2030” (2012) State Progress Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum S, Alsaleh Y (2012) Measuring innovation efficacy: an operational framework for mapping and measuring innovation capacity and performance of countries. Faculty & Research Working Paper, INSEAD, Abu Dhabi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum S, Poirson B (2008) UK global opportunities, local challenges. Absorbing innovation from above and below. Working Paper, NESTA, 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahroum S, Huggins R, Clayton N, Pain K, Taylor P (2008) Innovation by adoption. Measuring and mapping absorptive capacity in UK nations and regions

    Google Scholar 

  • Main Science and Technology Indicators (2014) OECD statistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Matatkova K, Stejskal J (2013) Descriptive analysis of the regional innovation system – novel method for public administration authorities. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 39:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineikaitė E (2013) Innovative activity opportunities for the development of Lithuania’s regions: methodological approach. Reg Formation Dev Stud 10(2):147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho RFF (2016) Absorptive capacity and business model innovation as rapid development strategies for regional growth. Investig Econ LXXV(295):157–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula R (2004) Understanding absorptive capacity in an ‘innovation system’ context: consequences for economic and employment growth. DRUID Working Paper No 04-02, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyeiwu St (2011) Does lack of innovation and absorptive capacity retard economic growth in Africa? Working Paper No. 2011/19, Word Institute of Development Economics Research, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Podvezko V (2011) The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inžinerinė ekonomika = Eng Econ 22(2):134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Puidokas M, Daukaitė I (2013) Lietuvos regioninės politikos tobulinimo kryptys Europos Sąjungos regioninės politikos kontekste (Influence of European Union in solving Lithuanian regional policy problems). Viešoji politika ir administravimas = Public Policy Adm 1(12):65–79 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen L, Boiardi P (2014) Creativity and regional innovation: evidence from EU regions. Res Policy 43:1508–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strube D (2011) Threshold effects from absorptive capacity and the efectiveness of innovation policy. Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  • The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth (2013) In: Dutta S (ed). INSEAD, WIPO, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulin P (2009) Labor mobility, knowledge diffusion, and regional growth. In: Paper for CESIS and the Division of Economics at KTH. The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS), Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Uotila T, Harmaakorpi V, Melkas H (2006) A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system. Fennia 1(184):49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hemert P, Iske PL (2015) Framing knowledge-based urban development and absorptive capacity of urban regions: a case-study of Limburg, The Netherlands. J Knowl Based Dev 6(4):314–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Outlook April 2015. Uneven Growth. Short- and Long-Term Factors (2015) International Monetary Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang E, Chen G, Feng G (2011) A network model of knowledge accumulation through diffusion and upgrade. Phys A 390:2582–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žvirblis A, Zinkevičiūtė V (2008) Įmonės aplinkos komponentų daugiakriterinio kiekybinio vertinimo principai ir modeliai (The principles and basic models for multi-criteria quantitative evaluation of business company’s environmental components). Verslo ir teisės aktualijos = Curr Issues Bus Law 1:183–191 (in Lithuanian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Juknevičienė, V., Mikolaitytė, J., Šaparnienė, D. (2018). Assessing the Absorptive Capacity of Regional Innovation Systems: A Case Study of Lithuanian Regions. In: Stejskal, J., Hajek, P., Hudec, O. (eds) Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67029-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics