Skip to main content

Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Procedure Planning and Guidance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Treatments for Aortic Valve and Root Diseases

Abstract

The role of non-invasive imaging for trans-catheter implant (TAVI) has increasingly been in procedure planning rather than peri-procedural imaging. With maturation of TAVI, there is movement to avoid general anaesthesia during the procedure, and rely mostly on fluoroscopy or a combination of trans-thoracic Echocardiography (TTE) and fluoroscopy. Accordingly, the emphasis is on optimal procedural planning to prevent peri-valvular leak (PVL) and complications such as annular rupture, and to establish the options for procedural access by evaluation of the vasculature. Thus, the following section will describe the role of imaging for TAVI planning followed by key steps for intra-procedural imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N, et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garbi M, Chambers J, Vannan MA, Lancellotti P. Valve stress echocardiography: a practical guide for referral, procedure, reporting, and clinical implementation of results from the HAVEC Group. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:724–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le VF, et al. Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dulgheru R, Pibarot P, Sengupta PP, et al. Multimodality imaging strategies for the assessment of aortic stenosis: viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) Group. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e004352. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2079–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn RT. Transcathether valve replacement and valve repair: review of procedures and intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging. Circ Res. 2016;119:341–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Calleja A, Thavendiranathan P, Ionasec RI, et al. Automated quantitative 3-dimensional modeling of the aortic valve and root by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in normals, aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis: comparison to computed tomography in normals and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasel AM, Cassese S, Bleiziffer S, et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:249–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansson NC, Norgaard BL, Barbanti M, et al. The impact of calcium volume and distribution in aortic root injury related to balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:382–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian Z, Lancellotti P, Vannan MA. Aortic root calcium burden and post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation paravalvular leak: Can’t Live Without It, Can’t Live With It. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:654–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood D, et al. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:247–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C, Chan KL, Goncalves A, Hahn RT, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zamorano J, Gonçalves A, Lancellotti P, et al. The use of imaging in new transcatheter interventions: an EACVI review paper. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(8):835–835af. pii: jew043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, Kapadia S, Leipsic J, Lerakis S, et al. A practicalguide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:441–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn RT, Little S, Monaghan MJ, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:261–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sengupta P, Wiley B, Basnet S, et al. Transthoracicechocardiography guidance for TAVR under monitored anesthesia care. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:379–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartel T, Edris A, Velik-Salchner C, Müller S. Intracardiac echocardiography for guidance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation under monitored sedation: a solution to a dilemma? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng AC, Delgado V, van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometriesbefore and after transcatheter aortic valveimplantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislicecomputed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagur R, Rodés-Cabau J, Doyle D, et al. Usefulness of TEE as the primary imaging technique to guide transcatheter transapical aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn RT, Gillam LD, Little SH, et al. Echocardiographic imaging of procedural complications during self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:319–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Détaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aorticvalve implantation: impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:821–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eggebrecht H, Doss M, Schmermund A, Nowak B, Krissel J, Voigtlander T. Interventional options for severe aortic regurgitation aftertranscatheter aortic valve implantation: balloons, snares, valve-in-valve. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101:503–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1438–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitationfollowing TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:340–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sinning JM, et al. Aortic regurgitation index defines severity of peri-prostheticregurgitation and predicts outcomein patients after transcatheter aorticvalve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S, Drews T, Hetzer R. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Genereux P, Reiss GR, Kodali SK, et al. Periaortic hematoma after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: description of a newcomplication. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:766–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Brochet M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brochet, E., Meduri, C., Rajagopal, V., Rinehart, S. (2018). Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Procedure Planning and Guidance. In: Fattouch, K., Lancellotti, P., Vannan, M., Speziale, G. (eds) Advances in Treatments for Aortic Valve and Root Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66483-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66483-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66482-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66483-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics