Skip to main content

Social and Environmental Responsibility in the Banking Industry: A Focus on Commercial Business

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing a Sustainable Financial System

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to measure social and environmental responsibility in the commercial activities of banks (external CSR performance)—in contrast to other models based on internal stakeholders—and define to what extent it is influenced by a bank’s size, banking model or business specialization. The banking sector is composed of diverse entities, which is not usually considered when social and environmental responsibility is defined and measured. Business risks and impacts of small- and medium-sized entities oriented to the commercial retail market are different from those of universal banks—which are highly diversified—both in financial and sustainable terms. Thus, the way CSR is being addressed by the banking industry should be reviewed to determine if there are diverse intra-sectorial approaches. An empirical analysis of European banks suggests that the current homogenization of the banking industry is unfavorable in terms of sustainability and responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This study is partially based on EIRIS data. A detailed description of this rating agency and the information provided can be found in Sect. 3.3.

  2. 2.

    Internal or structural CSR refers to aspects not exclusive to banking business such as corporate governance , human resources, internal environmental management , community involvement and sponsorship, and so on.

  3. 3.

    http://www.vigeo-eiris.com

  4. 4.

    http://im.thomsonreuters.com/solutions/content/asset4-esg/

  5. 5.

    www.bankscope.com/

  6. 6.

    Cluster 1 is composed by Banco Santander, Barclays PLC, BNP Paribas SA, Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, EFG International AG, HSBC Holdings PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, Societe Generale SA, UBS AG, UniCredit SpA.

    Cluster 2 is composed by Allied Irish Banks plc, Alpha Bank S.A., Banca Carige SpA, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, Banca Popolare di Milano, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A., Banco BPI S.A., Banco Comercial Portugues S.A., Banco de Valencia S.A., Banco Espanol de Credito S.A., Banco Espirito Santo S.A., Banco Popolare Societa Cooperativa, Banco Popular Espanol S.A., Bank of Ireland, Bankinter S.A., Commerzbank AG, Credit Agricole S.A., Danske Bank, Deutsche Postbank AG, Dexia S.A., DNB ASA, EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A., Erste Group Bank AG, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, KBC Groep NV, Lloyds Banking Group PLC, Mediobanca Group, National Bank of Greece, Natixis S.A., Nordea Bank AB, Provident Financial plc, Raiffeisen Bank International AG, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB, Standard Chartered PLC, Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Swedbank AB, UBI Banca Scpa.

  7. 7.

    The Equator Principles , promoted by the International Finance Corporation, is ‘a risk management framework, adopted by financial institutions, for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risk in projects. It is primarily intended to provide a minimum standard for due diligence to support responsible risk decision-making’ (www.equator-principles.com ).

  8. 8.

    In the case of year 2014, there are fewer data available for several indicators and companies.

Abbreviations

A4::

ASSET4 ESG database

ANOVA::

Analysis of variance

CSR::

Corporate social responsibility

ESG::

Environment, social and governance

EU::

European Union

ROE::

Return on equity

SME::

Small and medium enterprises

UK::

United Kingdom

References

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Universal banking and the future of small business lending. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1298316

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper: University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, A., Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., & Williams, K. (2014). The end of the experiment? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks. The British Accounting Review, 40(2), 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbó, S., & Rodríguez, F. (2014). El Sector Bancario Español: Una Comparación Con Sus Homólogos Europeos. Cuadernos De Información Económica, 238, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta-González, M., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A. (2006). Analysis of social performance in the Spanish financial industry through public data. A proposal. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A., Doris, J., & Johnson, B. (2004). Corporate social reporting in Irish financial institutions. The TQM Magazine, 16(6), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://ec.Europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-Social-responsibility/index_en.Htm

  • Fernández-Olit, B., & Cuesta-González, M. (2014). Assessment of social and environmental impacts originated in Europe during the period 2006–2010 by banking activities. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 32, 567–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, I. (2006). The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(2), 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., & Schmukler, S. L. (2006). Internationalization and stock market liquidity. Review of Finance, 10(1), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Minns, R. (1995). Undermining the financial basis of regions: The spatial structure and implications of the UK pension fund system. Regional Studies, 29(2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., Schneeweis, T., & Branch, B. (1990). Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management, 16(1), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H. (1998). The present and future roles of banks in small business finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6), 1109–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Gruber, V. (2011). “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnotta, E., & Philippon, T. (2011). Competing on speed. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17652

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R. (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 11, 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2008). The case against corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1213129

  • Schmid-Schönbein, O., Braunschweig, A., & Oetterli, G. (2002). SPI-finance 2002. Social performance indicators for the financial industry. Retrieved from http://www3.uji.es/~munoz/SPI_Finance_2002.pdf

  • Scholtens, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007a). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007b). Banking on the equator. Are banks that adopted the equator principles different from non-adopters? World Development, 35(8), 1307–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, P. E., & Weston, J. P. (1998). Small business lending and the changing structure of the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6), 821–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2010). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5(3), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., Diaz, M., & Schwegler, R. (2014). Corporate social responsibility of the financial sector – Strengths, weaknesses and the impact on sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 22(5), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., & Shen, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529–3547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández-Olit, B., de la Cuesta-González, M., Holgado, F.P. (2018). Social and Environmental Responsibility in the Banking Industry: A Focus on Commercial Business. In: Walker, T., Kibsey, S.D., Crichton, R. (eds) Designing a Sustainable Financial System. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66387-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics