Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Syphilis and Subjectivity
  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction to Syphilis and Subjectivity frames the chapters that follow, both in terms of the longer history of the disease and current scholarship in which this volume intervenes. This collection aims to broaden the interdisciplinary scholarship on syphilis and the cultures of medicine by investigating how syphilis in particular has had a role in shaping modern subjectivity, exploring texts and contexts beginning in the late nineteenth century and continuing in the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “Jewish” nominative for syphilis was of course not confined to the early modern period but remerged as a central point of the medicalized racial propaganda of the Nazi regime.

  2. 2.

    The first effective treatment against syphilis was the organoarsenical Arsphetamine (“Compound 606”) developed by Paul Ehrlich in 1909. This was followed by the advent of sulfa drugs such as Protonsil (sulfonamidochrysoidine) in 1932, which were effective on a broader range of gram-positive bacteria. On the history of antibiotics such as penicillin , see Podolsky (2015) and Bud (2007). On prior chemotherapeutic agents, such as Salvarsan and sulfas, see Lesch (2007).

  3. 3.

    On modern syphilis, see most recently, Losse (2016), McGough (2010). See also Healy (2001), Arrizabalaga et al. (1997), and Merians (1997). For feminist readings of British and French histories of the disease in the eighteenth century, see Spongberg (1997). Broader histories include the work of Allen (2000) and Quétel (1992). In her recent Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture (2017), Monika Pietrzak-Franger broadens the scope of the discussion by addressing the unexplored tensions between the visibility and invisibility of the disease and thus addresses a variety of cultural and media practices that accompanied the evocation of syphilis in the Victorian era.

  4. 4.

    We do not mean to suggest that antibiotic pharmacology was not also concerned with battlefield medicine and non-venereal disease acquired from combat and travel. Here, we are focusing on the hygienic and infectious disease aspects of military medicine.

  5. 5.

    In Western culture, as early as the English Civil War, the prophylactic was used as a preventative tool in military medicine to mitigate the devastating effects of venereal disease of soldiers. Fahd Khan et al. (2013)

References

  • Allen, Peter Lewis. 2000. The Wages of Sin: Sex and Disease, Past and Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrizabalaga, Jon, John Henderson, and Roger French. 1997. The Great Pox: The French Disease in Renaissance Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Kimeya. 2012. The Contagious Diseases Acts and the Prostitute: How Disease and the Law Controlled the Female Body. CL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1 (1): 88–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud, Robert. 2007. Penicillin: Triumph and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, R.D. 2013. Neurosyphilis. In Contemporary Neurology, 375–389. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaul, J.S., K. Grossschmidt, C. Gusenbauer, and F. Kanz. 2015. A Probable Case of Congenital Syphilis from Pre-Columbian Austria. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 72 (4): 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, V.N. 1997. Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care. American Journal of Public Health 87 (11): 1773–1778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, Sander L. 2010. Diseases & Diagnoses: The Second Age of Biology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Margaret. 2001. Fictions of Disease in Early Modern England: Bodies, Plagues and Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, James Howard. [1981] 1993. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Jonathan. 2014. Race in a Bottle: The Story of BiDil and Racialized Medicine in a Post-Genomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Fahd, Saheel Mukhtar, Ian K. Dickinson, and Seshardi Sriprasad. 2013. The Story of the Condom. Indian Journal of Urology 29 (1): 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesch, John E. 2007. The First Miracle Drugs: How the Sulfa Drugs Transformed Medicine. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losse, Deborah N. 2016. Syphilis: Medicine, Metaphor, and Religious Conflict in Early Modern France. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos, Timothy Carlos. 2008. Choleric Fictions: Epidemiology, Medical Authority and an Enemy of the People. Modern Drama 51 (3): 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGough, Laura. 2010. Gender, Sexuality, and Syphilis in Early Modern Venice: The Disease that Came to Stay. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merians, Linda E. 1997. The Secret Malady: Venereal Disease in Eighteenth Century Britain and France. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolsky, Scott H. 2015. The Antibiotic Era: Reform, Resistance, and the Pursuit of a Rational Therapeutics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Anne. 2012. Medicating Race: Heart Disease and Durable Preoccupations with Difference. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quétel, Claude. 1992. History of Syphilis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Dorothy. 2011. Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-Create Race in the Twenty-First Century. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Is Race-Based Medicine Good for Us?: African American Approaches to Race, Biomedicine, and Equality. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics 36 (3): 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, Tabitha. 2010. The Doctor in the Victorian Novel: Family Practices. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spongberg, Mary. 1997. Feminizing Venereal Disease: The Body of the Prostitute in Nineteenth-Century Medical Discourse. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan. 1979. Illness as Metaphor. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, Priscilla. 2008. Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowitz, Judith R. 1980. Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Harriet A. 2006. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nixon, K., Servitje, L. (2018). Introduction. In: Nixon, K., Servitje, L. (eds) Syphilis and Subjectivity . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66367-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66367-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66366-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66367-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics