Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trans- and Extraperitoneal Approach for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Robotic Urology

  • 1217 Accesses

Abstract

The number of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies has increased tremendously in recent years. In many institutions robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has become the standard of care. In the United States more than 85% of radical prostatectomies are performed by a robotic system (Leow et al., Eur Urol 70:837–845, 2016]. Advances of the console, the surgical arm cart as have made robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy have a standardized procedure all over the world (Su, Curr Opin Urol 20:130–135, 2010). Its advantages over conventional laparoscopy, such as seven degrees of freedom, dexterity enhancement, stereovision and tremor filtering result in a steeper learning curve for surgeons in comparison to conventional laparoscopy and for open surgeons allows easier adoption of minimal invasive techniques (Khatlani et al., Minerva Urol Nefrol 62:193–201, 2010)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gettman MT, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Katz R, Borkowski T, Antiphon P, Lobontiu A, Abbou CC. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):416–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. John H, Schmid DM, Fehr JL. Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy Da Vinci. Actas Urol Esp. 2007;31(6):580–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol. 2006;175(3 Pt 1):945–50; discussion 951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akand M, Erdogru T, Avci E, Ates M. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol. 2015;22(10):916–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, Srivastav SK, Thomas R, Davis R. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology. 2006;68(5):1077–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Atug F, Thomas R. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which one? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2007;59(2):143–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Capello SA, Boczko J, Patel HR, Joseph JV. Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(10):1199–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung JS, Kim WT, Ham WS, Yu HS, Chae Y, Chung SH, Choi YD. Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):787–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horstmann M, Vollmer C, Schwab C, Kurz M, Padevit C, Horton K, John H. Single-centre evaluation of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approach in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46(2):117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JY, Diaz RR, Cho KS, Choi YD. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(11):919–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madi R, Daignault S, Wood DP. Extraperitoneal v intraperitoneal robotic prostatectomy: analysis of operative outcomes. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1553–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cestari A, Ferrari M, Zanoni M, Sangalli M, Ghezzi M, Fabbri F, Sozzi F, Rigatti P. Side docking of the da Vinci robotic system for radical prostatectomy: advantages over traditional docking. J Robot Surg. 2015;9(3):243–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, Dietel A, Hafner T, Dimitriou D, Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos EN. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1467–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eden CG, King D, Kooiman GG, Adams TH, Sullivan ME, Vass JA. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter? J Urol. 2004;172(6 Pt 1):2218–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, Gettman MT, Katz R, Salomon L, Zaki S, de la Taille A, Abbou CC. Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;61(3):617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horstmann M. Editorial Comment to Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study. Int J Urol. 2015;22(10):922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(1):117–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Tarabuzzi R, Billia M, Grande S, Musso F, Burruni R, Renard J, Scarpa RM. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology. 2006;68(2):376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann O, Rassweiler J. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol. 2004;46(3):312–9; discussion 320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown JA, Rodin D, Lee B, Dahl DM. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases. Urology. 2005;65(2):320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, Fong YK, Lodde M, Kiss B, Marberger M. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2005;48(1):83–9; discussion 89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dal Moro F, Crestani A, Valotto C, Guttilla A, Soncin R, Mangano A, Zattoni F. Anesthesiologic effects of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(3):466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, Crouzet S, Ouzzane A, Flamand V, Villers A. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol. 2014;66(6):1033–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaouk JH, Akca O, Zargar H, Caputo P, Ramirez D, Andrade H, Albayrak S, Laydner H, Angermeier K. Descriptive technique and initial results for robotic radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology. 2016;94:129–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad MA, Sood A, Abdollah F, Diaz M, Karabon P, Sammon J, Jamil M, Baize B et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the Retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017. pii: S0302-2838(17)30339-1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, Wang Y, Hanske J, Sammon JD, Cole AP, Preston MA, Dasgupta P, Menon M, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol. 2016;70(5):837–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Su LM. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: advances since. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;20(2):130–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khatlani K, Sharma S, Mendoza PJ, Lee DI. The current state of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2010;62(2):193–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Malteser Hospital St. Josefshospital, 47803, Krefeld, Uerdingen, Germany

    Marcus Horstmann & Stephanos Papadoukakis

  2. Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Hubert John

Authors
  1. Marcus Horstmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanos Papadoukakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hubert John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hubert John .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Hubert John

  2. Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Peter Wiklund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Horstmann, M., Papadoukakis, S., John, H. (2018). Trans- and Extraperitoneal Approach for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65863-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65864-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation