Abstract
The concept of quality of life has changed in both significance and signifiers in recent years. Global, national, or regional problems have time and time again influenced the quality of life and well-being (Veleardi 2007). A greater knowledge of environmental issues and/or a greater sensitivity regarding certain social issues has led to the consideration of additional elements that can contribute to increasing the quality of life. Following the realization that economic growth is unsustainable (Meadows et al. 1972; IUSN, UNWP, WWF 1980), the concept of quality of life has become strongly linked to that of sustainable growth. In the long term, current needs cannot ignore the effect that satisfaction of them can have on future generations (WCED 1987: Brundtland Report).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AmbienteItalia (2003) European common indicators. Towards a local sustainability profile. Final report for the European Commission. Available at http://www.gdrc.org/uem/footprints/eci_final_report.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2017
Battaglia M, Meloni E, Cautillo A (2014) Technical assessment and public perception of environmental issues: the case of the municipality of Pisa. Local Environ 19(7):786–802
Brusa G (2008) La percezione del valore. Maggioli, Milan
Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL (1976) The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Easterlin RA (1974) Does economic growth improve human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David PA, Melvin WR (eds) Nation and households in economic growth: essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. Academic, New York, pp 89–125
European Commission (2015) Indicators for sustainable cities. doi: https://doi.org/10.2779/61700
EUROSTAT (2010) Crime and criminal justice, Statistics in Focus, 58/2010
Glatzer W (1984) In: Zapf W (ed) Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik: objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjektives, Wohlbefinden edn. Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt
IUSN, UNWP, WWF (1980) World conservation strategy. Available at https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2017
Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business, Boston
Martincigh L (2003) Qualità urbana e Mobilità sostenibile. In: Urbanistica tre. Edicola del Dipartimento di Studi Urbani, Università degli Studi Roma Tre
McLoughlin JP (1969) Urban & regional planning: a systems approach. Faber & Faber, London
Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows D, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York
Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox, Brooking Panel on Economic Activity, Spring 2008
Strümpel B, Scitovsky T (1976) The joyless economy: an inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 147–149
Velardi (2007) Rapporto Economico e Sociale, AUR, 2007
WCED (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Available at http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2017
Zajczyk F (1997) Il mondo degli indicatori sociali: una guida alla ricerca sulla qualità della vita, vol 318. Carocci, Rome
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Battaglia, M., Annesi, N. (2018). Efficient and Nice – Urban Sustainability and Quality of Life: The Socioeconomic Perspective. In: Quality of Life in Urban Landscapes. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65581-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65581-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65580-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65581-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)