Skip to main content

The Impetus for Peace Studies to Make a Collaborative Turn: Towards Community Collaborative Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

This chapter focuses upon the value of a collaborative community research approach within peace research and in particular upon the work that the authors are undertaking with activists and community organizers from Indigenous communities in North America and in East Africa. Using original case studies that focus upon moving the rights of Indigenous peoples forward in each country, this chapter outlines a praxis that is akin to “action research” in anthropology, where the researcher not only documents and examines what is taking place but uses that knowledge to advocate on behalf of the community with the community’s goals in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We recognize that the concept of community is complex and highly contested within the field of ethnography . In this case we adhere to the ideas put forward by Anthony Cohen who considered what it meant to be Saami in the Nuortabealli ssi’da as ‘to say almost everything of social significance about yourself, for it encompasses your kinship, your friendship, your domicile, your modes of life, love and death; it is the whole person…[P]eople assert community, whether in the form of ethnicity or locality, when they recognize in it the most adequate medium for the expression of their whole selves (Cohen 1985: 107).

  2. 2.

    In solidarity with Indigenous academics and advocates, the authors choose to capitalize ‘Indigenous peoples’ as a way to show respect and underline their distinctness as a category of peoples with its own regime of rights, as set out by the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous peoples. This capitalization also helps differentiate from the use of ‘indigenous’ as a synonym of autochthonous, aboriginal, or other words that have connotations of nativism. There is no internationally accepted definition of an ‘Indigenous People’. One of the most cited definitions is from Jose R. Martinez Cobo, the former Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, who in his study on the Problem of Discrimination against Indigenous Populations stated “Indigenous communities , peoples and nations are those which, having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of the societies now prevailing on those territories, or parts of them. They form at present non-dominant sectors of society and are determined to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity , as the basis of their continued existence as peoples, in accordance with their own cultural patterns, social institutions and legal system.” To review this study, see UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7

  3. 3.

    http://criticallegalthinking.com/2012/05/02/delinking-decoloniality-dewesternization-interview-with-walter-mignolo-part-ii/

  4. 4.

    In Kinyarwanda, the prefixes mu- and ba- are used to indicate singular and plural, respectively (Mutwa/Mututsi/Muhutu, singular; Twa/Batutsi/Buhutu, plural).

  5. 5.

    In the case of Maine, the Penobscot Nation had their own Institutional Review Boards that recognized the potentially damaging nature of Western academic research.

References

  • Aggestam, Karin. 2013. Recognitional Just Peace. In Rethinking Peacebuilding: The Quest for Just Peace in the Middle East and the Western Balkans, ed. Karin Aggestam and Annika Björkdahl. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIMPO. 2017. Resources. Accessed April 13, 2013. http://www.aimpo.org/resources

  • Bellamy, Alex. 2009. Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl, Annika, and Kristine Höglund. 2013. Precarious Peacebuilding: Friction in Global Local Encounters. Peacebuilding 1 (3): 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David. 2012. Resilience and Human Security: The Post-Interventionist Paradigm. Security Dialogue 43 (3): 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Anthony. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, John, and Jean Comaroff. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crazy Bull, Cheryl. 1997. A Native Conversation about Research and Scholarship. Tribal College 9 (1): 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cultural Survival. 2003. Rwanda: Batwa Appeal to Government for Affirmative Action. http://reliefweb.int/report/rwanda/rwanda-batwa-appeal-government-affirmative-action

  • Denzin, Norman K., Yvonne S. Lincoln, and Linda Tuhiwai Smith. 2008. Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donais, Timothy. 2012. Peacebuilding and Local Ownership: Post-Conflict Consensus Building. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2011. Total War as Environmental Terror: Linking Liberalism, Resilience and the Bunker. South Atlantic Quarterly 110 (3): 770–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herising, Fairn. 2005. Interrupting Positions: Critical Thresholds and Queer Pro/Positions. In Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous and Anti-Oppressive Approaches, ed. Leslie Allison Brown and Susan Strega, 127–151. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlatshwayo, Mondi. 2015. White Power and Privilege in Academic and Intellectual Spaces of South Africa: The Need for Sober Reflection. Politikon 42 (1): 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Mark. 2009. What is Left of the Liberal Peace? LSE Connect 21 (2): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmayer, Laurence, Stéphane Dandeneau, Elizabeth Marshall, Morgan Kahentonni Phillips, and Karla Jessen Williamson. 2011. Rethinking Resilience from Indigenous Perspectives. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 56 (2): 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, Luke Eric. 2005. Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology. Current Anthropology 46 (1): 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, Jean Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerche, Charles. 2001. Peace Building through Reconciliation. International Journal of Peace Studies 5 (2): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Jerome, and Judy Knight. 1995. The Twa of Rwanda. Assessment of the Situation of the Twa and Promotion of Twa Rights in Post-War Rwanda. World Rainforest Movement and International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger. 2008. Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace. Cooperation and Conflict 43 (2): 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver Richmond. 2013. The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Danny, and Kate Driscoll Derickson. 2012. From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, Gearoid. 2012. ‘Our Brothers who went to the Bush’: Post-Identity Conflict and Reconciliation in Sierra Leone. Journal of Peace Research 49 (5): 717–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah, Suthaharan, and David Rampton. 2015. The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace. Review of International Studies 41 (1): 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Examines Report of Rwanda. http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=19908&LangID=E

  • Peacock, James L. 1997. The Future of Anthropology. American Anthropologist 99 (1): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology. Current Anthropology 46 (1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelias, Robert. 2004. A Methodology of the Heart: Evoking Academic and Daily Life. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, Karen, and Leslie Brown. 2005. Becoming an Anti-Oppressive Researcher. In Research as Resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & Anti-Oppressive Approaches, ed. Leslie Brown and Susan Strega, 255–286. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury. 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Oliver P. 2011. A Post-Liberal Peace. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. A Pedagogy of Peacebuilding: Infrapolitics, Resistance, and Liberation. International Political Sociology 6 (2): 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. 1996. Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20071115053257/http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ch/rcap/sg/sgmm_e.html

  • Sabaratnam, Meera. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace. Security Dialogue 44 (3): 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2007. Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice. Global Society 21 (4): 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, Darby C. 2012. Introduction. In Action Anthropology and Sol Tax in 2012: The Final Word? ed. Darby C. Stapp, 1–12. Richland, WA: Northwest Anthropology LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teariki, Christine, Paul Spoonley, and Ngahiwi Tomoana. 1992. The Politics and Process of Research for Maori. Palmerston North: Department of Sociology, Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Collins, B., Watson, A. (2018). The Impetus for Peace Studies to Make a Collaborative Turn: Towards Community Collaborative Research. In: Millar, G. (eds) Ethnographic Peace Research. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65563-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics