Skip to main content

Observation Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Observation may be seen as the very foundation of everyday social interaction: as people participate in social life, they are diligent observers and commentators of others’ behavior. Observation is also one of the most important research methods in social sciences and at the same time one of the most complex. It may be the main method in the project or one of several complementary qualitative methods. As a scientific method it is has to be carried out systematically, with a focus on specific research questions. Therefore, we start with practical guide on clarifying research objectives, accessing the research field, selecting subjects, observer’s roles, and tips on documenting the data collected. The observation comprises several techniques and approaches that can be combined in a variety of ways. Observation can be either participant or not, direct or indirect. Further in this chapter, the main characteristics of three types of observations are outlined (the fourth type—direct non-participant—is discussed in the chapter on shadowing). While participant observation follows the ideal of a long-time immersion in a specific culture as a marginal member, researcher conducting non-participant observation takes position of an outsider and tries to distance him/herself from the taken-for-granted categorizations and evaluations. In the case of indirect observation, the researcher relies on observations of others (e.g. other researchers), various types of documentation, or self-observation. The chapter discusses the differences between those types of observation, shows inspirational examples from previous studies, and summarizes the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adjam, M. (2017). Minnesspår. Hågkomstens rum och rörelse i skuggan av flykt. Höör: Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvastson, G., & Ehn, B. (2009). Etnografiska observationer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, A., & Ciesielska, M. (2016). Ecomuseums as Cross-Sector Partnerships: Similarities and Dissimilarities in their Governance, Strategy and Leadership. Public Money and Management, 36(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielska, M. (2010). Hybrid Organisations. A Case of the Open Source-Business Setting. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielska, M., & Westenholz, A. (2016). Dilemmas Within Commercial Involvement in Open Source Software. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(3), 344–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielska, M., Wolanik Boström, K., & Öhlander, M. (2012). Obserwacja. In D. Jemielniak (Ed.), Badania Jakościowe. Podręcznik akademicki. Tom I: Podejścia, teorie, problemy (pp. 41–67). Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Eredita, M. A., & Barreto, C. (2006). How Does Tacit Knowledge Proliferate? An Episode-Based Perspective Organization Studies, 27(12), 1821–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D. H., & Harvey, J. (2014). Performing the Role of Ethnographer. Processing and Managing the Emotional Dimensions of Prison Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(5), 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant Observation and Fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson (Ed.), Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fangen, K. (2001). Pride and Power. A Sociological Study of the Norwegian Radical Nationalist Underground Movement. Oslo: Akademika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography. Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jauregui, B. (2013). Dirty Anthropology. Epistemologies of Violence and Ethical Entanglements in Police Ethnography. In W. Garriot (Ed.), Policing and Contemporary Governance. The Anthropology of Police in Practice. London: Palgrave and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klintberg, B. (1986). Råttan i pizzan. Stockholm: Norstedts Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostera, M. (2007). Organizational Ethnography: Methods and Inspirations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinetz, R. V. (2015). Netnography. Redefined. Thousand oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakumara, K. (2013). Making Sense of Sensory Ethnography. The Sensual and the Multisensory. American Anthropologist, 115(1), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2015). Doing Sensory Ethnography (2nd ed.). Los Angeles/London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pripps, O., & Öhlander, M. (2011). Observation. In L. Kaijser & M. Öhlander (Eds.), Etnologiskt fältarbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, W. (2001). Integrated Archaeology. A Garbage Paradigm. In V. Buchli & G. Lucas (Eds.), Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, W., & Murphy, C. (1992). Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silow Kallenberg, K. (2015). Smutsig etnografi. En metoddiskussion. Kulturella perspektiv, 24(2), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silow Kallenberg, K. (2016). Gränsland. Svensk ungdomsvård mellan vård och straff. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirin, P. (1999). Bringing the Outside in. Ethnography in/beyond the Classroom. Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolanik Boström, K., & Öhlander, M. (2015). Mobile Physicians Making Sense of Culture(s). On Mobile Everyday Ethnography. Ethnologia Europaea, 45(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ciesielska, M., Boström, K.W., Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation Methods. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics