Abstract
Understanding and preventing wildlife crime is challenging because of the complex interdependencies between animals, poachers, and rangers. To tackle this complexity, this study introduces a simple, general agent-based model of wildlife crime. The model is abstract and can be used to derive general conclusions about the emergence and prevention of wildlife crime. It can also be tailored to create scenarios which allows researchers and practitioners to better understand the dynamics in specific cases. This was illustrated by applying the model to the context of rhino poaching in South Africa. A virtual park populated by rhinos, poachers and rangers was created to study how an increase in patrol effort for two different anti-poaching strategies affect the number of poached rhinos. The results show that fence patrols are more effective in preventing wildlife crime than standard patrols. Strikingly, even increasing the number of ranger teams does not increase the effectiveness of standard patrols compared to fence patrols.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Banks, D., Davies, C., Gosling, J., Newman, J., Rice, M., Wadley, J., Walravens, F.: Environmental crime: a threat to our future, p. 25 (2008)
Clarke, R.V.: “Situational” crime prevention: theory and practice. Br. J. Criminol. 20, 136–147 (1980)
Maingi, J.K., Mukeka, J.M., Kyale, D.M., Muasya, R.M.: Spatiotemporal patterns of elephant poaching in South-Eastern Kenya. Wildl. Res. 39, 234 (2012). doi:10.1071/WR11017
Critchlow, R., Plumptre, A.J., Driciru, M., Rwetsiba, A., Stokes, E.J., Tumwesigye, C., Wanyama, F., Beale, C.M.: Spatiotemporal trends of illegal activities from ranger-collected data in a Ugandan National Park: trends in illegal activities. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1458–1470 (2015). doi:10.1111/cobi.12538
Gavin, M.C., Solomon, J.N., Blank, S.G.: Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conserv. Biol. 24, 89–100 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01387.x
Biderman, A.D., Reiss, A.J.: On exploring the “dark figure” of crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 374, 1–15 (1967). doi:10.1177/000271626737400102
Epstein, J.M., Axtell, R.: Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press, MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Birks, D.J., Donkin, S., Wellsmith, M.: Synthesis over analysis: towards an ontology for volume crime simulation. In: Artificial Crime Analysis Systems: Using Computer Simulations and Geographic Information Systems, pp. 160–192. IGI Global (2008)
Lemieux, A.M.: Introduction. In: Situational Prevention of Poaching (2014)
Milliken, T., Shaw, J.: The South Africa-Vietnam Rhino Horn Trade Nexus: A Deadly Combination of Institutional Lapses, Corrupt Wildlife Industry Professionals and Asian Crime Syndicates. TRAFFIC, Johannesburg (2012)
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
McKight, P.E., Najab, J.: Kruskal-Wallis Test. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (2010). doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0491
Moreto, W.: To conserve and protect: examining law enforcement ranger culture and operations in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Thesis, Rutgers University (2013)
Bell, R.H.V., Clarke, J.E.: Funding and financial control. In: Conservation and Wildlife Management in Africa, pp. 543–546. US Peace Corps, Washington, DC (1986)
Nyirenda, V.R., Chomba, C.: Field foot patrol effectiveness in the giant Kafue National Park. Zambia. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 4, 163–172 (2012). doi:10.5897/JENE12.010
Eck, J.E., Weisburd, D.L.: Crime places in crime theory. Crime Place Crime Prev. Stud. 4, 1–33 (2015)
Eloff, C., Lemieux, A.M.: Rhino poaching in Kruger National Park, South Africa. In: Situational Prevention of Poaching (2014)
ten Broeke, G., van Voorn, G., Ligtenberg, A.: Which sensitivity analysis method should I use for my agent-based model? J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. (2016). doi:10.18564/jasss.285
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Jacob van der Ploeg and Michael Mäs (University of Groningen, the Netherlands) for their help in developing and creating the model. Furthermore, AM Lemieux (Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement) and Craig Spencer (Balule Nature Reserve, South Africa) for their helpful comments and suggestions on the model.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Doormaal, N. (2017). Exploring Anti-poaching Strategies for Wildlife Crime with a Simple and General Agent-Based Model. In: Oliveira, E., Gama, J., Vale, Z., Lopes Cardoso, H. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65340-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65340-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65339-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65340-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)