Skip to main content

Visual Anthropology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2380 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to explain what visual anthropology is and to demonstrate her and her sister’s, visual sociology’s, uses in understanding the increasingly sophisticated competition for our (un)divided attention. This fierce, mostly visual and iconic, competition underpins systematically mobilized and individualized interactions and communications. These intense, passionate, individualized, mobile communications happen under our very eyes—otherwise known as processes, ebbs and flows of social life, they accelerate with the mobile multimedia connectivity. Navigating our increasingly complex social worlds (real, fictitious and virtual), comprehending these increasingly sophisticated cultural realities (real, virtual and interactive), requires skills, access to sociocultural capital and empowerment to employ the above-mentioned resources. Hence the growth of interest in visual communications, which facilitate learning outside of the range of control status gatekeepers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank Ms Ewa Mikina for pointing out this particular artistic project to me.

References

  • Alexander, V. D. (2003). Sociology of the Arts. Exploring Fine and Popular Forms. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankere, S., & Nelkin, D. (2003). The Molecular Gaze. Art in the Genetic Age. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making Our Way Through the World. Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1980). La chambre claire. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, H. (2003). Art History After Modernism. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2001). The Enchantment of Modern Life. Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. (2008). Storytelling Organizations. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. (2009). The Radicant. Berlin/New York: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London/New York: Routledge. (The First edition – 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The Network Society (First Part of the Trilogy: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture). Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy. In Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, D., & Willsdon, D. (Eds.). (2008). The Life and Death of Images. Ethics & Aesthetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimp, D. (1997). On the Museum’s Ruins. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikovitskaya, M. (2005). Visual Culture. The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorment, R. (2009, October 22). What Is an Andy Warhol? New York Review of Books, 56(16), pp. 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdowski, R., & Krajewski, M. (2010). For Photography (Za fotografię, in Polish). Warsaw: Korporacja Ha!art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duve, T. (1998). Kant After Duchamp. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, J. (Ed.). (2007). Photography Theory. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewen, S. (1988). All Consuming Images. The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. (2004). Prosthetic Gods. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, G. (1998). Oekonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Vienna: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, G. (2005). Mentaler Kapitalismus. Eine politische Oekonomie des Geistes. Vienna: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1988). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper Collins. (The First edition – 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvani, R. (2010). Philosophy of Love, Sex and Marriage. An Introduction. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariman, R. H., & Lucaites, J.-L. (2007). No Caption Needed. Iconic Photographs, Public Culture and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D. (2009). The Invisible Dragon. Essays on Beauty. Chicago/London: The Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindletter, B., Kaizen, W., Maimon, V., Mansoor, J., & McCormick, S. (Eds.). (2009). Communities of Sense. Rethinking Aesthetics and Politics. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvin, S. (2009). The Ontological Diversity of Visual Artworks. In K. Stock & K. Thomson-Jones (Eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books. (The First edition – 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecki, K. (2005). Ludzie i ich zwierzęta. Interakcjoinistyczno-symboliczna analiza świata społecznego zwierząt domowych [People and Their Animals. Interactionist-Symbolic Analysis of Social Life of Domestic Pets]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SCHOLAR (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. M. (Ed.). (1993). Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magala, S. (1978). Photography as an Element of the Theatralization of Social Life (Fotografia jako element teatralizacji życia społecznego). Fotografia 4, 6–7 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magala, S. (2009). The Management of Meaning in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke/New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of the New Media. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (2007). Theology Goes to the Movies. An Introduction to Critical Christian Thinking. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olechnicki, K. (Ed.). (2003a). Obrazy w działaniu. Studia z socjologii i antropologii obrazu [Images in Action. Studies in Sociology and Anthropology of Images]. Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Publishing House. (in Polish, with English abstracts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olechnicki, K. (2003b). Antropologia obrazu. Fotografia jako metoda, przedmiot i medium nauk społecznych [Anthropology of Images. Photography as a Method, Object and Medium of Social Sciences]. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olechnicki, K. (2009). Fotoblogi.Pamiętniki z opcją przekazu. Fotografia i fotoblogerzy w kulturze konsumpcyjnej [Photoblogs. Diaries with Communicating Option. Photography and Photobloggers in the Culture of Consumption]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, E. (1982). Meaning in the Visual Arts. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. (The First edition – 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2006). Visual Cultures of Science: Visual Representations and Expression in Scientific Knowledge Building and Science Communication. Hannover: Dartmouth College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, L. (2009). Visual Literacy, Visual Culture and Visual Scholarship: Adjusting a Distorted Picture. In Proceedings of IVLA, pp. 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. London/New York: Verso. (The First French edition – 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikora, S. (2004). Fotografia między dokumentem a symbolem [Photography Between a Document and a Symbol]. Warszawa/Izabelin: Świat Literacki/Instytut Sztuki PAN (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1977). On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2001). Where the Stress Falls. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia wizualna. Fotografia jako metoda badawcza [Visual Sociology. Photography as a Research Method]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, S. (2008). Seven Days in the Art World. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B. (2009). And Then There Is This. How Stories Live and Die in Viral Culture. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. (Ed.). (1997). Photography. A Critical Introduction. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, S. (1981). Studying Visual Communication. (Ed. Larry Gross). Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Magala, S. (2018). Visual Anthropology. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics