Skip to main content

Extracranial Cerebral Arteries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasonography in Vascular Diagnosis
  • 1596 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in Western industrialized countries. The most serious cerebrovascular manifestation is stroke with its complications, which is fatal in one third of cases. Patients who survive cerebral infarction often suffer from irreversible damage and paralysis and require permanent care. With atherosclerosis of the carotid artery circulation becoming more common with age, cerebral infarction gains relevance as the population ages (Fabres et al. 1994; Mannami et al. 2000; Roederer et al. 1984). Over 60–70% of all ischemic cerebral infarctions are caused by arterial embolism, typically arising from the carotid artery (Bock et al. 1993; Evans 1999; Roederer et al. 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abou-Zamzam AM Jr, Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Porter JM (2000) Is a single preoperative duplex scan sufficient for planning bilateral carotid endarterectomy? J Vasc Surg 31:282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Richmond BK, Robinson PA et al (1995) Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: comparative study of various duplex parameters. J Vasc Surg 22:751–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Kyer PD, Robinson PA, Hannay RS (1998a) The correlation of ultrasonic carotid plaque morphology and carotid plaque hemorrhage: clinical implications. Surgery 124:721–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Stickler DL et al (1998b) Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg 12:349–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Burns W, Mullins DA (1999a) Carotid artery dissection: a challenging diagnosis. W V Med J 95:17–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Covelli MA, Robinson PA, Holt SM (1999b) The role of carotid duplex ultrasound in evaluating plaque morphology: potential use in selecting patients for carotid stenting. J Endovasc Surg 6:59–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Wulu JT Jr, Crotty B (2002) Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke 33:1772–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • AbuRahma AF, Abu-Halimah S, Bensenhaver J et al (2008) Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis. J Vasc Surg 48:589–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ACAS (1995) Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. JAMA 273:1459–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov AV, Bladin CF, Maggisano R, Norris JW (1993) Measuring carotid stenosis. Time for reappraisal. Stroke 24(9):1291–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aly S, Bishop CC (2000) An objective characterization of atherosclerotic lesion: an alternative method to identify unstable plaque. Stroke 31:1921–1924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arning C (2004) Die Karotidynie im Ultraschallbild: Mythos, Syndrom oder Krankheitsbild? Nervenarzt 75:1200–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arning C (2005) Ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosing a dissection of the internal carotid artery. Ultraschall Med 26:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arning C, Hammer E, Kortmann H, Hahm H, Muller-Jensen A, Lachenmayer L (2003) Quantifizierung von A. carotis interna-Stenosen: Welche Ultraschallkriterien sind geeignet? Ultraschall Med 24:233–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arning C, von Reutern GM, Stiegler H, Gortler M (2010) Ultraschallkriterien zur Graduierung von Stenosen der A. carotis interna – Revision der DEGUM-Kriterien und Transfer in NASCET Stenosierungsgrade [Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement]. Ultraschall Med 31:251–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aschwanden M, Daikeler T, Kersten F, Baldi T, Benz D, Tyndall A (2013) Temporal artery compression sign - a novel ultrasound finding for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Ultraschall Med 34:47–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre D, Amato M, Bondioli A, Sirtori CR, Tremoli E (2000) Carotid artery intima-media thickness measured by ultrasonography in normal clinical practice correlates well with atherosclerosis risk factors. Stroke 31:2426–2430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikucki SA et al (1977) Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 26:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli A, Tremoli E, Colombo A et al (1988) Ultrasonographic measurement of the common carotid arterial wall thickness in hypercholesterolemic patients. Atherosclerosis 70:253–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R et al (2006) Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke 37:2696–2701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pross C, Shortsleeve CM, Baker JD et al (2001) Carotid endarterectomy with normal findings from a completion study: is there need for early duplex scan? J Vasc Surg 33:963–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beach KW (1992) 1975–2000: a quarter century of ultrasound technology. Ultrasound Med Biol 18:377–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K (1992) Duplex scanning of the peripheral arteries: correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol 18:433–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranke C, Creutzig A, Becker H, Trappe HJ (1999) Standardization of carotid ultrasound: a hemodynamic method to normalize for interindividual and interequipment variability. Stroke 30:402–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratiff DA, Gallagher PJ, Hames TK et al (1985) Characterization of carotid artery disease: comparison of duplex scanning with histology. Ultrasound Med Biol 11:835–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid JA, Wolsley C, Lau LL et al (2005) The effect of pravastatin on intima media thickness of the carotid artery in patients with nomal cholesterol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30:464–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth SM, Back MR, Bandyk DF et al (1999) A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 31:838–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM, Warlow CP (1999) Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 353:2105–2110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J et al (1994) Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. Stroke 25:2435–2439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP (2000a) Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Stroke 31:615–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell PM, Warlow CP, on behalf of the European Carotid surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2000b) Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? Stroke 31:622–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R (2007) CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1061–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K, Nagai Y et al (2003) Equivalence of plaque score and intima-media thickness of carotid ultrasonography for predicting severe coronary artery lesion. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:367–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandok BA (1983) Fibromuscular dysplasia of the internal carotid artery. Neurol Clin 1:17–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäberle W (2011) Ultrasonography in Vascular Diagnosis. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk EA, Bond MG, Aretz TH et al (1988) Multicenter validation study of real-time ultrasonography, arteriography, and pathology: pathologic evaluation of carotid endarterectomy specimens. Stroke 19:289–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WA (2006) Takayasu and temporal arteritis. Front Neurol Neurosci 21:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WA, Blockmans D (2005) Use of ultrasonography and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and assessment of large-vessel vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 17:9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WA, Gromnica-Ihle E (2002) Incidence of temporal arteritis in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective study using color Doppler ultrasonography of the temporal arteries. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41:46–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JA, Bierbrauer A, Wichert P (1993) Vaskulitiden großer Arterien. Internist 34:615–621

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WA, Kraft HE, Vorpahl K, Völker L, Gromnica-Ihle EJ (1997) Color duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. N Engl J Med 337:1336–1342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W, Seifert A, Gromnica-Ihle E, Krause A, Natusch A (2008) Ultrasound of proximal upper extremity arteries to increase the diagnostic yield in large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology 47:96–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke U, Motsch L, Hilker L, Kessler C (2000) Three-dimensional ultrasound observation of carotid artery plaque ulceration. Stroke 31:1651–1655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benninger DH, Georgiadis D, Gandjour J et al (2006) Accuracy of color duplex ultrasound diagnosis of spontaneous carotid dissection causing ischemia. Stroke 37:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Droste DW, Haas N et al (2000) Preoperative B-mode ultrasound plaque appearance compared with carotid endarterectomy specimen histology. Acta Neurol Scand 101:188–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med 12:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzer M, Fürst G, Fischer H, Siebler M et al (1993) Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke 24:1513–1518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzer M, Muller W, Siebler M, Hort W et al (1995) Plaque ulceration and lumen thrombus are the main sources of cerebral microemboli in high-grade internal carotid stenosis. Stroke 26:1231–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzer M, Wolfram M, Jörg R et al (1996) Color flow Doppler-assisted duplex imaging fails to detect ulceration in high-grade internal carotid artery Stenosis. J Vasc Surg 24:461–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JC, Watkins GE, Smith D et al (2012) Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model. Ann Vasc Surg 26:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soulez G, Therasse E, Robillard P et al (1999) The value of internal carotid systolic velocity ratio for assessing carotid artery Stenosis with Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 172:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stammler F, Ysermann M, Mohr W, Kuhn C, Goethe S (2000) Value of color-coded duplex ultrasound in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica without signs of temporal arteritis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125:1250–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, Boules TN, Selzer F, Makaroun MS (2005) Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria. J Endovasc Ther 12:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub D (2015) Atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization and inflammation – is there a link? Vasa 44:163–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub D, Schinkel AF, Coll B (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the vasa vasorum: from early atherosclerosis to the identification of unstable plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3:761–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub D, Partovi S, Schinkel AFL et al (2011) Correlation of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion echogenicity and severity at standard US with intraplaque neovascularization detected at contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 258:618–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub D, Partovi S, Imfeld S et al (2013) Novel applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. Vasa 42:17–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke W, Els T, Hennerici M (1992a) Comparison of flow disturbances in small carotid atheroma using a multi-gate pulsed Doppler system and Doppler color flow imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 18:11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke W, Hennerici M, Rautenberg W, Mohr JP (1992b) Symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenoses in Doppler color-flow imaging. Neurology 42:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterpetti AV, Hunter WJ, Schultz RD (1991) Importance of ulceration of carotid plaque in determining symptoms of cerebral ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg 32:154–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Cheng-Huai L, Chien-Jung L et al (2002) Carotid atherosclerosis, intima media thickness and risk factors – an analysis of 1781 asymptomatic subjects in Taiwan. Atherosclerosis 164:89–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Tyrrell K, Wolfson SK, Thompson T, Kelsoey SF (1992) Measurement variability in duplex scan assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 23:215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sztajzel R (2005) Ultrasonographic assessment of the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque. Swiss Med Wkly 135:635–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sztajzel R, Momjian-Mayor I, Comelli M et al (2006) Correlation of cerebrovascular symptoms and microembolic signals with the stratified gray-scale median analysis and color mapping of the carotid plaque. Stroke 37:824–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biasi GM, Sampaolo A, Mingazzini P et al (1999) Computer analysis of ultrasonic plaque echolucency in identifying high risk carotid bifurcation lesions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17:476–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi N, Itoh K, Honda M et al (1997) Comparative ultrasonographic and angiographic study of carotid arterial lesions in Takayasu’s arteritis. Angiology 48:9–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biasi GM, Froio A, Diethrich EB et al (2004) Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation 110:756–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tegos TJ, Sabetai MM, Nicolaides AN, Pare G, Elatrozy TS, Dhanjil S (2000a) Comparability of the ultrasonic tissue characteristics of carotid plaques. J Ultrasound Med 14:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegos TJ, Sohail M, Sabetai MM et al (2000b) Echomorphologic and histopathologic characteristics of unstable carotid plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1937–1944

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Kate GL, Sijbrands EJ et al (2010) Noninvasive imaging of the Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque. Curr Probl Cardiol 25:556–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodotou BC, Whaley R, Mahaley MS (1987) Complications following transfemoral cerebral angiography for cerebral ischemia: report of 159 angiograms and correlation with surgical risk. Surg Neurol 28:90–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian J, Hu S, Sun Y et al (2013) Vasa vasorum and plaque progression, and responses to atorvastatin in a rabbit model of artheriosclerosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and intravascular ultrasound study. Tian. Heart 99:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tratting S, Hübsch P, Frühwald F (1992a) Farbkodierte Dopplersonographie der Vertebralarterien. In: Frühwald F, Blackwell DE (Hrsg) Atlas der farbkodierten Doppersonographie. Gefäße und Weichteile des Halses und der oberen Extremität. Springer, Wien/New York, p 138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tratting S, Plötzleitner D, Hübsch P, Kaha K, Matula CH, Magometschnigg H (1992b) Nicht-invasive Verlaufskontrolle mittels farbkodierter Doppler-Sonographie nach operativen Eingriffen an den extrakraniellen hirnversorgenden Arterien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 156:224–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uthoff H, Staub D, Meyerhans A et al (2008) Intima media thickness and carotid resistive index: progression over 6 years and predictive value for cardiovascular events. Ultraschall Med 29:604–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine RJ (2003) Asymptomatic internal carotid artery aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 37:210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme H, Demoulin JC, Zicot M, Creemers E, Trotteur G, Limet R (1992) Pathological aspects of carotid plaques. J Cardiovasc Surg 33:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasovic L, Milenkovic Z, Jovanovic I et al (2008) Hypoglossal artery: A review of normal and pathological features. Neurosurg Rev 31:385–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vavuranakis M, Sigala F, Vrachatis DA et al (2013) Quantitativ analysis of carotid plaque vasa vasorum by CEUS and correlation with histology after endarterectomy. Vasa 42:184–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bluth EL, Kay D, Merritt CRB et al (1986) Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage. AJR 146:1061–1065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJK, Wartolowska K, Berry E, on behalf of the NHS Research and Development Health Technology Assessment Carotid Stenosis Imaging Group (2006) Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 367:1503–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh J, Sacharias N (1992) Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 182:243–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bock RW, Gray-Weale AC, Mock PA et al (1993) The natural history of asymptomatic carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg 17:160–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, Görtler M (2004) Doppler- und Duplexsonographie der hinversorgenden Arterien. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, von Reutern GM, Neuerburg-Heusler D (1986) Morphologische und dopplersonographische Kriterien zur Bestimmung von Stenosierungsgraden an der A. carotis interna. Ultraschall Med 7:70–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, Arnolds B, Drews S (1990a) Terminologie der Ultraschallgefäßdiagnostik. Ultraschall Med 11:214–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, Berger G, Hackspacher J et al (1990b) Reproduzierbarkeit sonographischer Kriterien zur Charakterisierung von Karotisstenosen. Ultraschall Med 11:56–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, Paulat K, Hackspacher J et al (1990c) Morphological characterization of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasound duplex scanning. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:349–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder B, Kleiser B, Hackspacher J, Reuchlin G, Dürr A (1992) Sonomorphological prediction of progressive carotid artery stenoses. In: Oka M et al (eds) Recent advances in neurosonology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 425–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijeyaratne SM, Jarvis S, Stead LA et al (2003) A new method for characterizing carotid plaque: multiple cross-sectional view echomorphology. J Vasc Surg 37:778–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock JP, Fitzgerald DE, Labs KH et al (1992) Consensus on problem areas in diagnostic vascular ultrasound. In: Labs KH et al (eds) Diagnostic vascular ultrasound. Arnold, London, pp 321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Deng YB, Zhu Y (2009) Correlation of carotid plaue neovascularization detected by using contrast-enhanced US with clinical symptoms. Radiology 251:583–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz E, Ilgit E, Taner D (1995) Primitive persistent carotid-basilar and carotid vertebral anastomosis. A report of seven cases and a review of the literature. Cin Anat 8:36–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuasa H, Mitake S, Oguri T et al (2005) A case of transient blindness due to severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery with persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA). Rinsho Shinkeigaku 45:579–582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Berg M, Ikonen A (2005) Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements. Eur Radiol 15:2359–2365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Felkai DD, Evans M et al (2008) Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 47:74–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond MG, Wilmoth SK, Enevold GL et al (1989) Detection and monitoring of asymptomatic atherosclerosis in clinical trials. Am J Med 86:33–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browman MW, Cooperberg PL, Harrison PB et al (1995) Duplex ultrasonography criteria for internal carotid stenosis of more than 70% diameter: angiographic correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J 46:291–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JM, Hammers LW, Barton JW et al (1995) Quantitative Doppler assessment of acute scrotal inflammation. Radiology 197:427–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton BS, Syms MJ, Petermann GW et al (2000) MR imaging of patients with carotidynia. Am J Neuroradiol 21:766–769

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Busuttil SJ, Franklin DP, Youkey JR et al (1996) Carotid duplex overestimation of stenosis due to severe contralateral disease. Am J Surg 172:144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT (1995) Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 22:697–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT (1996) Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 27:695–699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chahwan S, Miller MT, Pigott JP, Whalen RC, Jones L, Comerota AJ (2007) Carotid artery velocity characteristics after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 45:523–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chi YW, White CJ, Woods TC et al (2007) Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla MM, Paliotti R, Ferrero S, Vandone P, Magrini F, Zanchetti A (2002) Assessment of carotid plaque composition in hypertensive patients by ultrasonic tissue characterization: a validation study. J Hypertens 20:1589–1596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H (2006) High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Eur J Radiol 60:379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coli S, Magnoni M, Sangiorgi G et al (2008) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comerota AJ, Katz ML, Greenwald LL, Leefmans E, Czeredarczuk M, White JV (1990) Venous duplex imaging: should it replace hemodynamic tests for deep venous thrombosis? J Vasc Surg 11:53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KN, Humphrey PR (1993) Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56:967–972

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Bray JM, Baud JM, Dauzat M on behalf of the Consensus Conference (1997) Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc Dis 7:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzel C, Balzer K, Muller KM, Fellner F, Fellner C, Lang W (2003a) Relative value of normalized sonographic in vitro analysis of arteriosclerotic plaques of internal carotid artery. Stroke 34:1901–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denzel C, Fellner F, Wutke R, Bazler K, Muller KM, Lang W (2003b) Ultrasonographic analysis of arteriosclerotic plaques in the internal carotid artery. Eur J Ultrasound 16:161–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denzel C, Balzer K, Merhof D, Lang W et al (2009) 3D cross sectional view to investigate the morphology of internal carotid artery plaques. Is 3D ultrasound superior to 2D ultrasound? Ultraschall Med 29:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, Barnett HJM, Blom RJ (1987) Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 18:997–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Droste DW, Karl M, Bohle RM, Kaps M (1997) Comparison of ultrasonic and histopathological features of carotid artery stenosis. Neurol Res 19:380–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim S, Papacosta O, Whincup P et al (1999) Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke 30:841–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein HH, Winter R, Eichbaum M et al (2001) Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: validation of Doppler/duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen. Eur Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:301–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Barghouty N, Geroulkas G, Nicolaides A, Androulakis A, Bahal V (1995) Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterization. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 9:389–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Barghouty N, Nicolaides A, Bahal V, Geroulakos G, Androulakis A (1996b) The identification of the high risk carotid plaque. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11:470–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Barghouty NM, Levine T, Ladva S, Flanagan A, Nicolaides A (1996a) Histological verification of computerised carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11:414–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma OE, van Leersum M, Buijs PC et al (1998) Changes over time in optimal duplex threshold for the identification of patients eligible for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 29:2352–2356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elhammady MS, Baskaya MK, Sonmez OF et al (2007) Persistent primitive hypoglossal artery with retrograde flow from the vertebrobasilar system: a case report. Neurosurg Rev 30:345–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasziw M, Rankin RN, Fox AJ, Hynes RB, Barnett HJ (1995) Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 26:1747–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Carotid Plaque Study Group (1995) Carotid artery plaque composition - relationship to clinical presentation and ultrasound B-mode imaging. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10:23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyding J, Geier B, Staub D (2011) Current strategies and possible perspectives of ultrasonic risk stratification of ischemic stroke in internal carotid artery disease. Ultraschall Med 32:267–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faggioli GL, Pini R, Mauro R et al (2011) Identification of carotid ‘vulnerable plaque’ by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: correlation with plaque histology, symptoms and cerebral computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:238–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faught WE, Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS et al (1994) Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg 19:818–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillinger MF, Baker RJ Jr, Zwolak RM et al (1996) Carotid duplex criteria for 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. J Vasc Surg 24:856–864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkenzeller T, Tacke J, Clevert DA et al (2008) Quantification of extracranial ICA stenoses with vessel ultrasound by CCDS and B-flow in comparison to 64-slice multidector CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA. Ultraschall Med 29:294–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukudome Y, Abe I, Onaka U et al (1998) Regression of carotid wall thickening after corticosteroid therapy in Takayasu’s arteritis evaluated by B-mode ultrasonography: report of 2 cases. J Rheumatol 25:2029–2032

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geroulakos G, Domjan J, Nicolaides A, Stevens J et al (1994) Ultrasonic carotid artery plaque structure and risk of cerebral infarction on computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 20:263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves I, Lindholm MW, Pedro LM et al (2004) Elastin and calcium rather than collagen or lipid content are associated with echogenicity of human carotid plaques. Stroke 35:2795–2800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Görtler M, Niethammer R, Widder B (1994) Differentiating subtotal carotid artery stenoses from occlusions by colour-coded duplex sonography. J Neurol 241:301–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant EG, Duerinckx AJ, El Saden SM et al (2000) Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid stenoses: fact or fiction? Radiology 214:247–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL et al (2003) Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 229:340–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR et al (1988a) Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen. J Cardiovasc Surg 29:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR et al (1988b) Comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg 29:676–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gronholdt ML, Wiebe BM, Laursen H (1997) Lipid-rich carotid artery plaques appear echolucent on ultrasound B-mode images and may be associated with intraplaque haemorrhage. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 14:439–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grønholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Wiebe BM, Wilhjelm JE, Sillesen H (1998) Echo-lucency of computerized ultrasound images of carotid atherosclerotic plaques are associated with increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as well as increased plaque lipid content. Circulation 97:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grønholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Schroeder TV, Vorstrup S, Sillesen H (2001) Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes. Circulation 104:68–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Bentzon J (2002) Macrophages are associated with lipid-rich carotid artery plaques, echolucency on B-mode imaging, and elevates plasma lipid levels. J Vasc Surg 35:137–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E (2010) 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 376:1074–1084

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, Hougaku H, Kamada T (1995) Ischemic stroke events and carotid atherosclerosis. Results of the Osaka Follow-up Study for Ultrasonograhic Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerois (the OSACA Study). Stroke 26:1781–1786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ (1990) Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 21:209–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrer JU, Sasse A, Klötzsch C (2006) Intimal flap in a conmon carotid artery in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome. Ultraschall Med 27:487–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heberer G, Van Dongen RJAM (eds) (1993) Gefäßchirurgie. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo. Kirschnersche allgemeine und spezielle Operationslehre, Bd 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedblad B, Wikstrand J, Janzon L et al (2001) Low-dose metroprolol CR/XL and fluvastatin slow progression of carotid intima-media thickness: main results from the Beta-Blocker Cholesterol-Lowering Asymptomatic Plaque Study (BCAPS). Circulation 103:1721–1726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellings WE, Peeters W, Moll FL et al (2010) Composition of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated with cardiovascular outcome: a prognostic study. Circulation 121:1941–1950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RD, Steinman DA, Eliasziw M, Barnett HJ (2000) Effect of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on carotid ultrasound velocity measurements. Stroke 31:2636–2640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermus L, Tielliu IF, Wallis de Vries BM, van den Dungen JJ, Zeebregts CJ (2010a) Imaging the vulnerable carotid artery plaque. Acta Chir Belg 110:159–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermus L, van Dam GM, Zeebregts CJ (2010b) Advanced carotid plaques imaging. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:125–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill SL, Donato AT (1994) Ability of the carotid duplex scan to predict stenosis, symptoms and plaque structure. Surgery 116:914–920

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Homma S, Ishii T, Tsugane S, Hirose N (1997) Different effects of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia on the natural history of aortic atherosclerosis by the stage of intimal lesion. Atherosclerosis 125:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homma S, Hirose N, Inagaki T, Suzuki M, Wakida Y (1999) Lifestyle, familial history and social background of Japanese centenarians. In: Tauchi H, Sato T, Watanabe T (eds) Japanese centenarians – medical research for the final stages of human aging. Editorial and Publishing Office of Japanese Centenarians, Aichi, pp 20–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Homma S, Hirose N, Ishida H, Ishii T, Araki G (2001) Carotid plaque and intima-media thickness assessed by B-mode sonography in subjects ranging from young adults to centenarians. Stroke 32:830–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honda O, Sugiyama S, Kugiyama K et al (2004) Echolucent carotid plaques predict future coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1177–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hood DB, Mattos MA, Mansour A et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery Stenosis. J Vasc Surg 23:254–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogi A, Adam D, Hoffman A (2011) Carotid plaque vulnerability: quantification of neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 96:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrow MM, Stassi J, Shurman A, Brody JD, Kirby CL, Rosenberg HK (2000) The limitations of carotid sonography: interpretive and technology-related errors. Am J Roentgenol 174:189–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunink MG, Polak JF, Barlan MM, O’Leary DH (1993) Detection an quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:619–625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huston J, James E, Brown RD Jr et al (2000) Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 75:1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janzarik WG, Ringleb PA, Reinhard M et al (2007) Recurrent carotid artery vasospasms. Report of 2 cases. Stroke 37:2170–2173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagawa R, Moritake K, Shima T, Okada Y (1996) Validity of B-mode ultrasonographic findings in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in comparison with angiographic and clinicopatholgic features. Stroke 27:700–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kakkos SK, Stevens JM, Nicolaides AN et al (2007) Texture analysis of ultrasonic images of symptomatic carotid plaques can identify those plaques associated with ipsilateral embolic brain infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:422–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kallmayer M, Tsantilas P, Zieger C, Ahmed A, Söllner H, Zimmermann A, Eckstein H (2014) Ultrasound surveillance after CAS and CEA: What’s the evidence? J Cardiovasc Surg 55:33–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa R, Ishihara S, Okawara M et al (2008) A successful treatment with carotid artery stenting for a symptomatic internal carotid artery severe stenosis with ipsilateral persistent primitive hypoglossal artery: case report and review of the literature. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kardoulas DG, Kastamouris AN, Gallis PT (1996) Ultrasonographic and histologic characteristics of symptom-free and symptomatic carotid plaque. Cardiovasc Surg 4:580–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller F, Loewe HJ, Bauknecht KJ, Schwarz A, Offermann G (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. Dtsch Med Wschr 113:332–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler C, von Maravic M, Bruckmann H, Kompf D (1995) Ultrasound for the assessment of the embolic risk of carotid plaques. Acta Neurol Scand 92:231–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khaw KT (1997) Does carotid duplex imaging render angiography redundant before carotid endarterectomy? Br J Radiol 70:235–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch JD, Wagner LR, James EM et al (1994) Carotid artery occlusion: positive predictive value of duplex sonography compared with angiography. J Vasc Surg 19:642–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura A, Iso H, Imano H et al (2004) Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque characteristics as a risk factor for stroke in Japanese elderly men. Stroke 35:2788–2794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kono Y, Pinell SP, Sirlin CB (2004) Carotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography – preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 230:561–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon BJ, Jung C, Sheen SH et al (2007) CT angiography of stented carotid arteries: comparison with Doppler ultrasonography. J Endovasc Ther 14:489–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labropoulos N, Leon LR Jr, Gonzalez-Fajardo JA et al (2007) Nonatherosclerotic pathology of the neck vessels: prevalence and flow patterns. Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal BK, Hobson RW, Goldstein J, Chakhtoura EY, Duran WN (2004) Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria? J Vasc Surg 39:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lal BK, Hobson RW, Tofighi B, Kapadia I, Cuadra S, Jamil Z (2008) Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 47:63–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langsfeld M, Gray-Weale AC, Lusby RJ (1989) The role of plaque morphology and diameter reduction in the development of new symptoms in asymptomatic carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg 9:548–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SC, Wardlaw JM (2002) Which Doppler velocity is best for assessing suitability for carotid endarterectomy? Eur J Ultrasound 15:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Cai J, Tegeler C et al (1996) Reproducibility of extracranial carotid atherosclerotic lesions assessed by B-mode ultrasound: the ARIC Study. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:791–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liapis CD, Gugulakis A, Misiakos E, Verkokos C, Dousaitou B, Sechas M (1994) Surgical treatment of extracranial carotid aneurysms. Int Angiol 13:290–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libby P (2002) The fire within. Sci Am 286:46–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Hands LJ, Walton J, Rothwell PM (2004) Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 110:2190–2197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lusby RJ (1993) Plaque characterisation: does it identify high risk groups? In: Bernstein EF, Callow AD, Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG (eds) Cerebral revascularisation. Med-Orion, London/Los Angeles/Nicosia, pp 93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannami T, Baba S, Ogata J (2000) Potential of carotid enlargement as a useful indicator affected by high blood pressure in a large general population of a Japanese city: the Suita study. Stroke 31:2958–2965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O (2001) Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the Tromso Study. Circulation 103:2171–2175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Barkmeier ID et al (1993) Routine surveillance after carotid endarterectomy: does it affect clinical management? J Vasc Surg 17:819–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meairs S, Hennerici M (1999) Four-dimensional ultrasonographic characterization of plaque surface motion in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 30:1807–1813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P, Strobel M (2008) Intima-Media Dicke-Messung. Medizinische Verlagsgesellschaft, Berlin, pp 9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW et al (1993a) Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET): Angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 17:152–157. discussion 157–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta GL, Lee RW, Yeager RA et al (1993b) Mesenteric duplex scanning: a blinded prospective study. J Vasc Surg 17:79–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Lee RW, Porter JM (1993c) Noninvasive localisation of arterial occlusive disease: a comparison of segmental Doppler pressures and arterial duplex mapping. J Vasc Surg 17:578–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G et al (1995) Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 21:989–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore WS (2003) For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation is unnecessary. Stroke 34:1816–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau P, Albat B, Thévenet A (1994) Surgical treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 8:409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosso M, Jung HH, Baumgartner RW (2007) Recurrent spontaneous vasospasm of cervical carotid ophthalmic and retinal arteries causing repeated retinal infarcts: a case report. Cerebrovasc Dis 24:381–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neale ML, Chambers JL, Kelly AT et al (1994) Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. J Vasc Surg 20:642–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuerburg-Heusler D (1984) Dopplersonographische Diagnostik der extrakraniellen Verschlußkrankheit. Vasa 12(Suppl):59–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides AN (1995) Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke: identification of a high risk group (ACSRS): a natural history study. Int Angiol 14:21–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell TF Jr, Erdoes L, Mackey WC et al (1985) Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with the pathologic findings of carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 120:443–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary D, Glagov S, Zarins C, Giddens D (1991) Carotid artery disease. In: Rifkin MD, Charboneau JW, Laing FC (eds) Ultrasound 1991: Special Course Syllabus, 77th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. RSNA, Oak Park, pp 189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter TA, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, O’Hara PJ (1985) Extracranial carotid aneurysms: report of six cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 2:312–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM et al (1995) Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 21:82–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park AE, McCarthy WJ, Pearce WH, Matsumura JS, Yao JST (1998) Carotid plaque morphology correlates with presenting symptomatology. J Vasc Surg 27:872–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Chung JW, Lee JW, Han MH, Park JH (2001) Carotid artery involvement in Takayasu’s ateritis: evaluation of the activity by ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 20:371–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufsa RA (1995) Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 26:1753–1758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel SG, Colli DA, Wardlaw JM (2002) Outcome, observer reliability and patient preferences if CTA, MRA or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:21–28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavela J, Ahanchi S, Steerman SN, Higgins JA, Panneton JM (2014) Grayscale median analysis of primary stenosis and restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 59:978–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro LM, Pedro MM, Gonçalves I et al (2000) Computer-assisted carotid plaque analysis: characteristics of plaques associated with cerebrovascular symptoms and cerebral infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:118–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro LM, Fernandes e Fernandes J, Pedro MM (2002) Ultrasonographic risk score of carotid plaques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24:492–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson BG, Longo GM, Kibbe MR et al (2005) Duplex ultrasound remains a reliable test even after carotid stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 19:793–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schäberle, W. (2018). Extracranial Cerebral Arteries. In: Ultrasonography in Vascular Diagnosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64997-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64997-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64996-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64997-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics