Skip to main content

A Liaison of Poetry and Tattoos: The Multivoicedness in Edgar Allan Poe’s Poem “The Raven”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poetry And Imagined Worlds

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

First published in 1845, Edgar Allan Poe’s poem “The Raven” has inspired many. For Poe himself, the raven—relentlessly repeating the word “Nevermore”—symbolizes a tragic and everlasting remembrance. Today, the poem has been translated into many languages, and has been interpreted in manifold ways. It has also been illustrated by numerous artists, and has been an inspiration for individuals looking for tattoo images. The key question in this chapter is why individuals chose a tattoo depicting an image from “The Raven.” Which aspect of the poem appealed to them the most, and why? The transformation of life events into words by the poet, then back into symbols representing other individuals’ life events and meanings, will be discussed in the light of dialogicality and multivoicedness.

And the Raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting,

On the pallid bust of Pallas just above my chamber door;

And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon’s that is dreaming,

And the lamplight o’er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;

And my soul from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor

Shall be lifted—nevermore!

Edgar Allan Poe, last verse of “The Raven,” 1845

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Poe admired and was influenced by the works of John Keats . In Keats’ “Ode On Melancholy” (1819), the last and final stanza starts with: “She dwells with Beauty—Beauty that must die,” the theme Poe choses for his own poem as well. How important Keats’ work was for Poe is shown in a 1844 letter, in which Poe writes: “I am profoundly excited by music , and by some poems —those of Tennyson especially—whom, with Keats, Shelley, Coleridge (occasionally), and a few others of like thought and expression, I regard as the sole poets” (Poe Museum, 2014, 2nd paragraph).

  2. 2.

    Holland (2009) points out, however, that “the brain processes fresh, poetic metaphors differently from dead metaphors like ‘grasping’ an idea” (p. 98). Neurological processes have thus to be considered as well.

  3. 3.

    Holland (2009) points out that the act of creation, which in Poe’s case is writing, has a compulsory aspect, and may be linked to psychopathologies (e.g., addiction or being suicidal). He gives diverse examples including Poe, but also points out that such compulsions cannot indicate a mandatory condition, because counterexamples do exist. Divergent thinking , neurotransmitters, and other brain functions are also discussed in this reference.

  4. 4.

    Tattoo artists are not mentioned in this chapter, but are an important part of the dialogical nature of the tattoo narrative. They lay the grounds for a story to be told later.

  5. 5.

    For Poe, we have to consider the phenomenon of intertextuality (cp. Brockmeier & Carbough, 2001), since every text (poem) derives from and refers to other texts. It is indeed known that Poe was inspired by other writers (Stedman, 1884) in addition to personal experience.

  6. 6.

    In an interview, Frost is asked to explain what he meant by saying that poems may clear up confusion in your own mind. He says: “[…] I can see in nearly every poem some answer to some doubt or some question, you know, that’s come up in my mind—even in argument with people or something—a difficulty in a situation, you know, that needs a phrase to finish it off. The same as in diplomacy they find a phrase. It’s just like diplomacy—you find a phrase.” Not only tattoos, but also poems can thus fulfill the same purpose: providing security (whole interview from 1958 can be found here: http://www.frostfriends.org/FFL/Periodicals/Interview-lewis.html).

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, J., & Carbough, D. (Eds.). (2001). Narrative and identity. Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. (1993). Body work: Objects of desire in modern narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deter-Wolf, A., Robitaille, B., Krutak, L., & Galliot, S. (2016). The world’s oldest tattoos. Journal of Archaeological Science, 5, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, S. G., & Bower, G. H. (1984). Cognitive consequences of emotional arousal. In C. L. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp. 547–588). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halász, L. (1983). Dem Leser auf der Spur. Literarisches Lesen als Forschen und Entdecken. Zur Sozialpsychologie des literarischen Verstehens. Braunschweig: Vieweg & Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (Eds.). (2010). Dialogical self theory. Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. N. (2009). Literature and the brain. Gainesville, FL: The PsyArt Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldgaard, D., & Bengtsson, A. (2015). Consuming the fashion tattoo. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, R. (Ed.). (1959). Marcel Duchamp. New York: Paragraphic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, J. M. (1972). Die Struktur literarischer Texte. München: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, L., & Watzlawik, M. (2016). Debates about the scientific status of psychology: Looking at the bright side. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9352-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, A., & Turtiainen, J. (2005). A life told in ink: Tattoo narratives and the problem of the self in late modern society. AutoBiography, 13, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poe, E. A. (1845). The Raven. New York: Evening Mirror.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, E. A. (1846). The philosophy of composition. Graham’s Magazine, XXVIII(4), 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe Museum. (Ed.). (2014). Museum collection: Flower from the tomb of Keats [online document]. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from https://www.poemuseum.org/collection-details.php?id=201

  • Roberts, D. J. (2012). Secret ink: Tattoo’s place in contemporary American culture. Journal of American Culture, 35(2), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, D., Hodgetts, D., & McLeay, C. (2011). Identity, community and embodiment: Chopper’s tattoo tour. The Australian Community Psychologist, 23(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, E. C. (1884/2014). Comment on the poem. In E. A. Poe (Ed.), The Raven. Minneapolis, MN: First Avenue Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman, P. (1999). Only skin deep? Tattooing, piercing and the transgressive body. In M. Aaron (Ed.), The body’s perilous pleasure. Dangerous desires and contemporary culture (pp. 165–187). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitoriano, H. B. S., & Gomes, A. L. (2015). The Raven and the intermediality. Polifonia, Cuiabá-MT, 22(32), 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawik, M., Silva Guimaraes, D., Han, M., & Jung, A. (2016). First names as signs of personal identity: An intercultural comparison. Psychology & Society, 8(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. T. (2008). Proper names and persons: Peirce’s semiotic consideration of proper names. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44(2), 346–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V., & Smolka, A. L. B. (1994). Continuing the dialogue: Vygotsky, Bakhtin, and Lotman. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Charting the agenda. Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. 69–90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T. (2006). Dynamics and inferiority: Ruptures and transitions in self development. In L. Mathias Simão & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question: Labyrinths of the self (pp. 187–214). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watzlawik, M. (2017). A Liaison of Poetry and Tattoos: The Multivoicedness in Edgar Allan Poe’s Poem “The Raven”. In: Lehmann, O., Chaudhary, N., Bastos, A., Abbey, E. (eds) Poetry And Imagined Worlds. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64858-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics