Skip to main content

Not for Twitter: Migration as a Silenced Topic in the 2015 Spanish General Election

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse

Part of the book series: Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse ((PSDS))

Abstract

The general election of 20 December 2015, in Spain was marked by the emergence of new parties claiming new ways of understanding politics. For these parties, the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) is a key element in democratic regeneration (Mancera & Pano, El discurso político en Twitter. Anthropos: Barcelona, 2013; Fuchs, OccupyMedia!, Zero Books, 2014), and Twitter has been used as a major tool for political communication. This chapter discusses work that is part of an investigation into the discourse strategies used in Twitter during this electoral campaign. Considering silence as a discourse strategy, this chapter discusses research on how some relevant topics in relation to human rights were silenced in digital discussion. This chapter focuses on silences related to migration to Spain.

The project’s main hypothesis is that the extension restrictions imposed by Twitter should affect the discursive strategies (Squires, The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Devon: Routledge, 2016), letting the relations between concepts be more clearly established. The approach is based on the comparison of the presence of the topic of immigration in 16,305 tweets from the Twitter accounts of the main political parties and candidates during the 2015 campaign with its presence in the political manifestos and in a large corpus of a million-and-a-half-words from the four main Spanish newspapers. Data show that the topic was so relevant in the latter that it should also have been expected in the tweets, where its presence is marginal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcántara-Plá, M. (2014). El concepto de oración para el español oral. Oralia, 17, 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. Proceedings of LREC 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S., Loper, E., & Klein, E. (2009). Natural language processing with python. O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. V. (2014, July 17). Instagram’s ‘mommy wars’: The right to bare chest. SFGate. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Instagram-s-mommy-wars-the-right-to-bare-chest-5626780.php#photo-6604616

  • Brummett, B. (1980). Towards a theory of silence as a political strategy. The Quaterly Journal of Speech, 66, 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2015). Working the story. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (p. 384). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2013). The Internet and the opening up of political space. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (p. 384). Somerset: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EGM: Encuesta General de Medios. (2015). Official report. Retrieved from http://www.aimc.es/-Datos-EGM-Resumen-General-.html

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routdledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. Vol. 2. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. J. (1982). “Frame semantics”. Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2014). OccupyMedia! Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, B. (2016). Pseudopolítica: el discurso político en las redes sociales. Universidad de Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, C. (2004). Unspoken: A rhetoric of silence. Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2005). Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In Co-edited book with J. Torfing, Discourse theory and European politics: Identities, policy and governance. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A radical view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancera, A., & Pano, A. (2013). El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padró, L., & Stanilovsky, E. (2012). FreeLing 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture, 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, L. (2016). Twitter: Design, discourse, and the implications of public text. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Devon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2014). Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(3), 368–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiesmeyer, L. (Ed.). (2003). Discourse and silencing: Representation and the language of displacement (Vol. 5). John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editors for the insightful comments on earlier versions of this chapter. Corpus linguistics approaches always call for many helping hands, and we are grateful to the members of our research group “Wor(l)ds Lab” at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. The study reported in this chapter is part of the project “Estrategias de encuadre y articulación del discurso politico en 140 caracteres”, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs (FFI-2014-53958-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alcántara-Plá, M., Ruiz-Sánchez, A. (2018). Not for Twitter: Migration as a Silenced Topic in the 2015 Spanish General Election. In: Schröter, M., Taylor, C. (eds) Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64579-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64580-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics