Abstract
The general election of 20 December 2015, in Spain was marked by the emergence of new parties claiming new ways of understanding politics. For these parties, the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) is a key element in democratic regeneration (Mancera & Pano, El discurso político en Twitter. Anthropos: Barcelona, 2013; Fuchs, OccupyMedia!, Zero Books, 2014), and Twitter has been used as a major tool for political communication. This chapter discusses work that is part of an investigation into the discourse strategies used in Twitter during this electoral campaign. Considering silence as a discourse strategy, this chapter discusses research on how some relevant topics in relation to human rights were silenced in digital discussion. This chapter focuses on silences related to migration to Spain.
The project’s main hypothesis is that the extension restrictions imposed by Twitter should affect the discursive strategies (Squires, The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Devon: Routledge, 2016), letting the relations between concepts be more clearly established. The approach is based on the comparison of the presence of the topic of immigration in 16,305 tweets from the Twitter accounts of the main political parties and candidates during the 2015 campaign with its presence in the political manifestos and in a large corpus of a million-and-a-half-words from the four main Spanish newspapers. Data show that the topic was so relevant in the latter that it should also have been expected in the tweets, where its presence is marginal.
References
Alcántara-Plá, M. (2014). El concepto de oración para el español oral. Oralia, 17, 63–84.
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–305.
Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. Proceedings of LREC 2004.
Bird, S., Loper, E., & Klein, E. (2009). Natural language processing with python. O’Reilly Media.
Brown, K. V. (2014, July 17). Instagram’s ‘mommy wars’: The right to bare chest. SFGate. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Instagram-s-mommy-wars-the-right-to-bare-chest-5626780.php#photo-6604616
Brummett, B. (1980). Towards a theory of silence as a political strategy. The Quaterly Journal of Speech, 66, 289–303.
Bruns, A. (2015). Working the story. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (p. 384). New York: Routledge.
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Madrid: Alianza.
Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.
Coleman, S. (2013). The Internet and the opening up of political space. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (p. 384). Somerset: Wiley Blackwell.
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 363–380.
EGM: Encuesta General de Medios. (2015). Official report. Retrieved from http://www.aimc.es/-Datos-EGM-Resumen-General-.html
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routdledge.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. Vol. 2. Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). “Frame semantics”. Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
Fuchs, C. (2008). Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2014). OccupyMedia! Zero Books.
Gallardo, B. (2016). Pseudopolítica: el discurso político en las redes sociales. Universidad de Valencia.
Glenn, C. (2004). Unspoken: A rhetoric of silence. Southern Illinois University Press.
Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Howarth, D. (2005). Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In Co-edited book with J. Torfing, Discourse theory and European politics: Identities, policy and governance. Palgrave.
Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Sage.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A radical view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mancera, A., & Pano, A. (2013). El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Padró, L., & Stanilovsky, E. (2012). FreeLing 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC).
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture, 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Squires, L. (2016). Twitter: Design, discourse, and the implications of public text. In A. Georgakopoulou & T. Spilioti (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Devon: Routledge.
Taylor, C. (2014). Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(3), 368–400.
Thiesmeyer, L. (Ed.). (2003). Discourse and silencing: Representation and the language of displacement (Vol. 5). John Benjamins Publishing.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52.
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.
Acknowledgements
We thank the editors for the insightful comments on earlier versions of this chapter. Corpus linguistics approaches always call for many helping hands, and we are grateful to the members of our research group “Wor(l)ds Lab” at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. The study reported in this chapter is part of the project “Estrategias de encuadre y articulación del discurso politico en 140 caracteres”, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs (FFI-2014-53958-P).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alcántara-Plá, M., Ruiz-Sánchez, A. (2018). Not for Twitter: Migration as a Silenced Topic in the 2015 Spanish General Election. In: Schröter, M., Taylor, C. (eds) Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64579-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64580-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)