Skip to main content

18 Suprasellar Craniopharyngiomas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 736 Accesses

Abstract

Craniopharyngioma tumors are histologically benign, but their management remains challenging because of their intimate relationship to vital neurovascular structures such as the optic apparatus, pituitary stalk, hypothalamus, and vessels of the circle of Willis. Surgery remains the mainstay of suprasellar craniopharyngioma management. Although total resection should be the goal, a subtotal resection with postoperative radiation is a reasonable option if the lesion is adherent to the hypothalamus or other eloquent midline structures. Open transcranial approaches are the standard of care for surgical intervention, which have stood the test of time. More recently, minimally invasive transcranial keyhole approaches and endoscopic endonasal approaches have been added to the armamentarium of skull base neurosurgeons. In 18.2, we discuss the options available for open transcranial approaches to craniopharyngioma tumors and consider their relative merits and limitations, patient selection criteria, perioperative care, complication avoidance, management principles, and surgical outcomes. No single operative technique can be considered as the “best approach” for all patients. Each patient is best served by the formulation of an individualized, tailored surgical plan that aims to realistically and safely achieve the expected management goals. The supraorbital “eyebrow” craniotomy is an ideal approach for those tumors that are anterior or superior to the optic apparatus, and we discuss this in 18.3. Meticulous attention to detail during the approach and tumor dissection as well as the closure will help achieve good tumor resection, minimize morbidity, and maintain cosmesis. The use of surgical tools such as the micro-Doppler probe and neuroendoscopy are helpful to visualize and preserve critical neurovascular structures. Attentive postoperative management is necessary for good long-term outcomes with close monitoring and treatment of endocrinopathies. The use of stereotactic radiation therapy and targeted molecular therapy should be utilized as necessary.

Recently, there has been increased application of the endoscopic endonasal approach for these tumors. In appropriately selected cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach offers excellent direct visualization of the undersurface of the optic chiasm and its vascular perforators, hypothalamus, and third ventricle, which contributes to safer microdissection and a more complete removal while minimizing potential complications. In 18.4, we review the technical nuances and surgical pearls for resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas using the endoscopic endonasal approach. We also discuss factors involved in approach selection and complication avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References (Key References Bolded)

  1. Hoffman HJ. Surgical management of craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1994;21(Suppl 1):44–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunin GR, et al. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus. 1997;3(6):e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan J, et al. Growth patterns of craniopharyngiomas: clinical analysis of 226 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):418–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alli S, Isik S, Rutka JT. Microsurgical removal of craniopharyngioma: endoscopic and transcranial techniques for complication avoidance. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016 Nov;130(2):299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Komotar RJ, Roguski M, Bruce JN. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurooncol. 2009 May;92(3):283–96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zada G, Laws ER. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in the pediatric population. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;74(1):62–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jung TY, Jung S, Choi JE, et al. Adult craniopharyngiomas: surgical results with a special focus on endocrinological outcomes and recurrence according to pituitary stalk preservation. J Neurosurg. 2009 Sep;111(3):572–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Elliott RE, Jane JA, Jr., Wisoff JH. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children: meta-analysis and comparison of transcranial and transsphenoidal approaches. Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):630–43. Discussion 43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McLaughlin N, Ditzel Filho L, Shahlaie K, Solari D, Kassam A, Kelly D. The supraorbital approach for recurrent or residual suprasellar tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54(04):155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kassam A, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Carrau R, Mintz A, Prevedello D. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(4):715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barkhoudarian G, Cutler AR, Yost S, Lobo B, Eisenberg A, Kelly DF. Impact of selective pituitary gland incision or resection on hormonal function after adenoma or cyst resection. Pituitary. 2015;18(6):868–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koutourousiou M, Gardner P, Fernandez-Miranda J, Tyler-Kabara E, Wang E, Snyderman C. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: surgical outcome in 64 patients. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(5):1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dlouhy B, Madhavan K, Clinger J, et al. Elevated body mass index and risk of postoperative CSF leak following transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(6):1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ivan M, Iorgulescu J, El-Sayed I, et al. Risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis after expanded endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(1):48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LeVay A, Kveton J. Relationship between obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(2):275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dare A, Landi M, Lopes D, Grand W. Eyebrow incision for combined orbital osteotomy and supraorbital minicraniotomy: application to aneurysms of the anterior circulation. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(4):714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Figueiredo E, Deshmukh V, Nakaji P, et al. An anatomical evaluation of the mini-supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(4 Suppl 2):ONS212.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi T, Kida Y, Mori Y, Hasegawa T. Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for the treatment of craniopharyngioma in 98 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(6):482–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stripp D, Maity A, Janss A, et al. Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(3):714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Komotar R, Starke R, Raper D, Anand V, Schwartz T. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2012;77(2):329.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sheehan J, Niranjan A, Sheehan J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: an intermediate review of its safety, efficacy, and role in the neurosurgical treatment armamentarium. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(4):678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gopalan R, Dassoulas K, Rainey J, Sherman J, Sheehan J. Evaluation of the role of Gamma Knife surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(5):E5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reisch R, Marcus H, Hugelshofer M, Koechlin N, Stadie A, Kockro R. Patients’ cosmetic satisfaction, pain, and functional outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4 Suppl):242.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Park J, Jung T, Kang D, Lee S. Preoperative percutaneous mapping of the frontal branch of the facial nerve to assess the risk of frontalis muscle palsy after a supraorbital keyhole approach. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(5):1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dusick J, Esposito F, Malkasian D, Kelly D. Avoidance of carotid artery injuries in transsphenoidal surgery with the Doppler probe and micro-hook blades. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4 Suppl 2):322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oskouian R, Kelly D, Laws E Jr. Vascular injury and transsphenoidal surgery. Front Horm Res. 2006;34:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yaşargil M, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy P, Roth P. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg. 1990;73(1):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vinchon M, Weill J, Delestret I, Dhellemmes P. Craniopharyngioma and hypothalamic obesity in children. Child Nerv Syst. 2009;25(3):347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson D, Duong H, Teo C, Kelly D. The supraorbital endoscopic approach for tumors. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6 Suppl):S72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ditzel FL, McLaughlin N, Bresson D, Solari D, Kassam A, Kelly D. Supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy for removal of intraaxial frontal brain tumors: a technical note. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(2):348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Paladino J, Mrak G, Miklić P, Jednacak H, Mihaljević D. The keyhole concept in aneurysm surgery – a comparative study: keyhole versus standard craniotomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;48(5):251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen A, Perneczky A, Rodziewicz G, Gingold S. Endoscope-assisted craniotomy: approach to the rostral brain stem. Neurosurgery. 1995;36(6):1128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fatemi N, Dusick J, de Paiva NM, Malkasian D, Kelly D. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5 Suppl 2):269.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu JK, Sevak IA, Carmel PW, Eloy JA. Microscopic versus endoscopic approaches for craniopharyngiomas: choosing the optimal surgical corridor for maximizing extent of resection and complication avoidance using a personalized, tailored approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Dec;41(6):E5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baldauf J, Hosemann W, Schroeder HW. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26:363–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu JK, Christiano LD, Patel SK, Eloy JA. Surgical nuances for removal of retrochiasmatic craniopharyngioma via the endoscopic endonasal extended transsphenoidal transplanum transtuberculum approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E14.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Oldfield EH. Transnasal endoscopic surgery for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Apr;28(4):E8a. Discussion E8b.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dhandapani S, et al. Endonasal endoscopic reoperation for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:418–430.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2012;77:329–41.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liu JK, Schmidt RF, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Eloy JA. Surgical nuances for nasoseptal flap reconstruction of cranial base defects with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks after endoscopic skull base surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32:E7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zacharia BE, Amine M, Anand V, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal management of craniopharyngioma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016;49:201–12.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cavallo LM, et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:100–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William T. Couldwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Couldwell, W.T., Kelly, D.F., Liu, J.K. (2019). 18 Suprasellar Craniopharyngiomas. In: Evans, J., Kenning, T., Farrell, C., Kshettry, V. (eds) Endoscopic and Keyhole Cranial Base Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64379-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64379-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64378-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64379-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics