Abstract
Introduction: The umbilicus has an important role in the natural and aesthetic appearance of the abdomen as it is the only “natural scar” present after birth and it creates perfect harmony within the body. The appearance of the umbilicus changes through aging and is affected by some pathology. In surgery, it is the target for many considerations of abdominoplasty techniques.
Pre-operative: Anesthesiologist evaluation and lab tests according to the AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines are performed. Markings are crucial to achieve optimal results as several locations have been described, but only some of them are acceptable. We describe our experience and best approach using the “Ideal Umbilicus Zone” as the area delimited over the midline (from the xyphoid process to the pubis), between the midpoint and the joint of the two upper thirds with the lower third.
Surgical technique: Umbilicoplasty follows after the lipoabdominoplasty procedure, usually by 2 weeks. Delaying the procedure has allowed us to diminish flap suffering and avoid some other complications. A cross-shaped incision is made after marking the ideal umbilicus location and flaps are sutured to the abdominal wall.
Post-operative: The wound is covered with gauze embedded with topical antibiotic (nitrofurazone) for 1 week and then replaced by a spherical splint or marble for 2 weeks. Loose garments and a foam vest are used from 4 to 6 weeks after the lipoabdominoplasty. After the umbilicoplasty, the garment is used for an extra 2–4 weeks.
Conclusion: Many techniques have been described for umbilicoplasty. However, most publications are not conclusive. X-shaped umbilicoplasty describes a new way to remake the belly button after full lipoabdominoplasty, but also after tumor resections, hernia reconstructions, or any other procedure involving umbilical deformities. Delaying the procedure results in fewer complications and better outcomes but it has to be carefully explained to the patient before the procedure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sven EB, Berend V, Tik LT, Roland WL, Hieronymus P. “Scarless” umbilicoplasty: a new umbilicoplasty technique and a review of the English language literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:15–20.
Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett L. In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:389.
Kurul S, Uzunismail A. A simple technique to determine the future location of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(753)
Lee MJ, Mustoe TA. Simplified technique for creating a youthful umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2136.
Pfulg M, Van de Sijpe K, Blondeel PH. A simple new technique for neo-umbilicoplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:688.
Castillo PF, Sepúlveda CA, Prado AC, et al. Umbilical reinsertion in abdominoplasty: technique using deepithelialized skin flaps. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007;31:519–20.
Rozen SM, Redett R. The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:2255–62.
Rogliani M, Silvi E, Arpino A, et al. The Maltese cross technique: umbilical reconstruction after dermolipectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:1036–8.
Uraloglu M, Tekin F, Orbay H, et al. Simultaneous abdominoplasty and umbilical reconstruction using a modified C-V flap technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2525–6.
Masuda R, Takeda A, Sugimoto T, et al. Reconstruction of the umbilicus using a reverse fanshaped flap. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2003;27:349–53.
Santanelli F, Mazzocchi M, Renzi L, et al. Reconstruction of a natural-looking umbilicus. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002;36:183–5.
Shinohara H, Matsuo K, Kikuchi N. Umbilical reconstruction with an inverted C-V flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:703–5.
Itoh Y, Arai K. Umbilical reconstruction using a cone-shaped flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;28:335–8.
Jamra FA. Reconstruction of the umbilicus by a double V–Y procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:106–7.
Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1153.
Akbas H, Güneren E, Eroğlu L. Natural-looking umbilicus as an important part of abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2003;27:139.
Massiha H, Montegut W, Phillips R. A method of reconstructing a naturallooking umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:228–31.
Malic CC, Spyrou GE, Hough M, et al. Patient satisfaction with two different methods of umbilicoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:357–61.
Southwell-Keely JP, Berry MG. Umbilical reconstruction: a review of techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:803–8.
Mazzocchi M, Trignano E, Armenti AF, Luca AF, Dessy A. Long-term results of a versatile technique for umbilicoplasty in abdominoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2011;35:456–62.
Matarasso A. Classification and patient selection in abdominoplasty. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;3(1):7–14.
Muallem MM, Rubeiz NG. Physiological and biological skin changes in pregnancy. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24:80–3.
Nussbaum R, Benedetto AV. Cosmetic aspects of pregnancy. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24:133–41.
Fleisher et al. ACC/AHA 2007 perioperative guidelines. JACC. 2007;50(17):e159–241.
Rodriguez-Feliz JR, Makhijani S, Przybyla A, Hill D, Chao J. Intraoperative assessment of the umbilicopubic distance: a reliable anatomic landmark for transposition of the umbilicus. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2011;36(1):8–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoyos, A. (2018). Omphaloplasty: X-Shaped Flap Technique. In: Murillo, W. (eds) Omphaloplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64313-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64313-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64312-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64313-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)