Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revision THA Post Resurfacing Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Adult Hip - Master Case Series and Techniques

  • 1012 Accesses

Abstract

Femoral neck fracture and aseptic loosening of either acetabular or femoral component are the most frequent indications of revision of HRA. Among other infections and metallosis, with or without adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs), are other revision reasons [1]. Several risk factors have been implicated; however, their role is not fully understood. Female sex is considered as a risk factor for HRA revision mainly due to the smaller implant size that is used for them [1]. Older people especially over the age of 55 years old have worse bone quality that further increase the risk for revision [2, 3]. Implant factors, including decreased component size and malpositioning, have been also recognized as risk factors [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carrothers AD, et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92(10):1344–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prosser GH, et al. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):66–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross TP, Liu F. Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Langton DJ, et al. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(9):1143–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes JA, Stambough JB, Barrack RL, Nam D. Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9:103–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Arican P, et al. The role of bone SPECT/CT in the evaluation of painful joint prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36(9):931–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walter LR, et al. Distribution of chromium and cobalt ions in various blood fractions after resurfacing hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(6):814–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wyles CC, et al. Utility of synovial fluid aspirations in failed metal on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(5):818–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon YM, et al. Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(4):444–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nam D, Barrack RL, Potter HG. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3665–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma AK, et al. Two-stage exchange for infected resurfacing arthroplasty: use of a novel cement spacer technique. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6):976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):735–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Su EP, Su SL. Surface replacement conversion: results depend upon reason for revision. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(11 Suppl A):88–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandiford NA, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Skinner JA. Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post-operative period. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Whiteside LA. Surgical technique: gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata transfer for primary deficiency of the abductors of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pritchett JW. One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris. J Arthroplast. 2014;29:219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Prosser GH, Graves SE, Davidson DC, Stanford TE. Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty 397 cases from the Australian joint replacement registry. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):72–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(8):1019–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidutz F, Wanke-Jellinek L, Jansson V, Fottner A, Mazoochian F. Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a bone-conserving short-stem implant: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong JM, et al. What is the rerevision rate after revising a hip resurfacing arthroplasty? Analysis from the AOANJRR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3458–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eswaramoorthy VK, Biant LC, Field RE. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(11):1454–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, et al. Revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42:259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, De Smet KA. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1158–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garrett SJ, Bolland BJ, Yates PJ, Gardner EM, Latham JM. Femoral revision in hip resurfacing compared with large-bearing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2011;26:1214–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandiford NA, Muirhead A, Skinner J. Revision of the well-fixed Birmingham Hip Resurfacing acetabular component–results using a novel device. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:49–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Günther KP, Stiehler M. Revision in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: current knowledge. In: Bentley G, editor. European Instructional lectures, vol. Vol. 15. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 143–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Orthopaedic Unit, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Eustathios Kenanidis M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc.

  2. Academic Orthopaedic Unit, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Eleftherios Tsiridis M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S., F.R.C.S.

  3. University Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medicine at Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    Klaus-Peter Günther M.D.

Authors
  1. Eustathios Kenanidis M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eleftherios Tsiridis M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S., F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Klaus-Peter Günther M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eleftherios Tsiridis M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.S., F.R.C.S. or Klaus-Peter Günther .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Eleftherios Tsiridis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kenanidis, E., Tsiridis, E., Günther, KP. (2018). Revision THA Post Resurfacing Arthroplasty. In: Tsiridis, E. (eds) The Adult Hip - Master Case Series and Techniques. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64177-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64177-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64175-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64177-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation