Skip to main content

Double Boundary and Cosmopolitan Experience in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization, Supranational Dynamics and Local Experiences

Part of the book series: Europe in a Global Context ((EGC))

  • 484 Accesses

Abstract

This contribution aims to open up the debate about national, European and cosmopolitan identity through an interpretation of Simmel’s double boundary dialectic: human beings are boundaries and only those who stand outside their boundaries can see them as such. One difficulty with defining oneself as European stems from what could be called the “double Other” (intra- and extra-European) diachronic recognition process. Exploring the possible/impossible cosmopolitan meta-synthesis can identify certain traits of the cosmopolitan experience in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (2004). The cosmopolitan canopy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, J. (1994). Geertz, Kuhn and the idea of a cultural paradigm. British Journal of Sociology, 597–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Europe of strangers. Working Paper No. 3, ESRC Transnational Communities Programme, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birindelli, P. (2014). The passage from youth to adulthood: Narrative and cultural thresholds. Lenham: University Press of America (Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birindelli, P. (2017). The cultural experience of international students: Narratives from North and South Europe. Retrieved from http://culturalexperienceabroad.blogspot.com

  • Calhoun, C. (2003). The class consciousness of frequent travellers: Towards a critique of actually existing cosmopolitanism. In D. Archibugi (Ed.), Debating cosmopolitics (pp. 86–116). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchelli, V. (2012). L’esprit cosmopolite: Voyages de formation des jeunes en Europe. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchelli, V., Octobre, S. (2015) Sur le Cosmopolitisme Esthetique des Jeunes. Le Débat 183: 101–10109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchelli, V., Octobre, S., & Riegel, V. (2016). After the omnivore, the cosmopolitan amateur: Reflections about aesthetic cosmopolitanism. Global Studies Journal, 9(1), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L.A. (1972) The alien as a servant of power: Court Jews and Christian renegades. American Sociological Review (37): 574–5581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2009). The European heritage: History, memory, and time. In C. Rumford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of European studies (pp. 36–51). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delueze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1987). Review essay. Symbolic Interaction, 10(2), 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1959). Values, psychology and human existence. In A. H. Maslow (Ed.), New knowledge in human values. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemann Molz, J. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and consumption. In M. Rovisco & M. Nowicka (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to cosmopolitanism (pp. 33–52). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. (2005). Two faces of cosmopolitanism: Culture and politics. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 107(3), 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. (2005). Introduction to Georg Simmel’s essay ‘Europe and America in world history. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(1), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, D. (2014). Cosmopolitans and cosmopolitanism: Between and beyond sociology and political philosophy. Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, A. (2016). Mobile elites: Understanding the ambiguous lifeworlds of sojourners, dwellers and homecomers. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(5), 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory Culture & Society, 19(4), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self: Psychic survival in troubled times. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 450–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leed, E. J. (1991). The mind of the traveler: From Gilgamesh to global tourism. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. N. (1989). Simmel as a resource for sociological metatheory. Sociological Theory, 7(2), 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta, V. P. (2010). The cosmopolitan stranger. In S. Van Hooft & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), Questioning cosmopolitanism (pp. 105–120). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). For love of country: Debating the limits of patriotism. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossewaarde, M. (2007). Cosmopolitanism and the society of strangers. Current Sociology, 55(3), 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2004). The European dream: How Europe’s vision of the future is quietly eclipsing the American dream. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, B. (1992). Comparative cosmopolitanism. Social Text, 31(2), 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, M. (2012). Festivals, museums, exhibitions. Aesthetic cosmopolitanism in the cultural public sphere. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Routledge handbook of cosmopolitan studies (pp. 232–244). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1944). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. In A. Schutz (Ed.), Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca. (1987). De Otio (A. Padgen, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1902/1964). The metropolis and mental life. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409–424). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1907/1986). Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908/1950). The stranger. In K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–408). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1908/1971). The stranger. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), George Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 143–149). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1910/1959). In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), Georg Simmel, 1858–1918: A collection of essays, with translations and a bibliography. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1918/1971). The transcendent character of life. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 353–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrbis, Z., Woodward I. (2007) The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness. Sociological Review 55(4): 730–7747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotkin, R. (1986). Myth and the production of history. In S. Bercovitch & J. Myry (Eds.), Ideology and classic American literature (pp. 70–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotkin, R. (2000). Regeneration through violence: The mythology of the American frontier, 1600–1860. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (1999). Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szerszynski, B., & Urry, J. (2006). Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: Inhabiting the world from afar. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (2002). Cosmopolitan virtue, globalization and patriotism. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(1–2), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D., & Weinstein, M. A. (1989). Simmel and the dialectic of the double boundary. Sociological Inquiry, 59(1), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Birindelli, P. (2018). Double Boundary and Cosmopolitan Experience in Europe. In: Caselli, M., Gilardoni, G. (eds) Globalization, Supranational Dynamics and Local Experiences . Europe in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64075-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64075-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64074-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64075-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics