Skip to main content

Living in the “Past”: The Effects of a Growing Preservation Discourse in Contemporary Urban China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter problematizes a growing preservation discourse in China by discussing its impacts upon urban renewal and the residents living in an old, dilapidated inner city neighbourhood in Qingdao. While a group of history and heritage enthusiasts call for “authentic” preservation of the area’s architecture, the city government wants to turn it into a place for cultural consumption and tourism. The individual memories of residents living in the inner city, however, neither fit the official narratives nor those of the authenticity-seeking heritage enthusiasts. This chapter critically engages the existing preservation discourse and argues that the exclusive focus on preserving architectural remains actually stands in the way of a more inclusive and appropriate way of dealing with inner city problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    It was the name of a fishing village located in the area before the Germans occupied it.

  2. 2.

    Screen walls were erected at entrances inside courtyards to shelter the interior from the prying eyes of outsiders.

  3. 3.

    Based on data provided by informants.

  4. 4.

    China’s hukou system came into being in its current form in the 1950s (Fan 2008). It divides the entire country into two groups: those holding a rural and those holding with an urban household registration. The goal was to prevent the rural population from flooding into cities. An urban hukou offers significant advantages in terms of welfare , benefits, and subsidies. Since membership in either group is assigned at birth and inherited from the mother, Potter and Potter (1990: 296) refer to this birth-ascribed stratification as displaying “caste-like features”.

  5. 5.

    Chronic illnesses have been identified as one major cause of impoverishment in China, especially among retirees (Wu et al. 2010: 105).

  6. 6.

    As of December 2016, 1 yuan equalled 0.14 Euro.

References

  • Abramson, D. B. (2007). The Dialectics of Urban Planning in China. In F. Wu (Ed.), China’s Emerging Cities: The Making of New Urbanism (pp. 66–87). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J. (2011). Preservation, Conservation and Heritage: Approaches to the Past in the Present Through the Built Environment. Asian Anthropology, 10, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. S. (2013). The Politics of Preservation: Privileging One Heritage over Another. International Journal of Cultural Property, 20(4), 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (2009). UNESCO’s 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Implications of Community Involvement in ‘Safeguarding’. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible Heritage. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Heritage Quarterly. (2005). China’s New Commitment to Heritage. Published Online March 2005. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/editorial.php?issue=001

  • De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. (2014). Neglect of a Neighbourhood: Oral Accounts of Life in ‘Old Beijing’ Since the Eve of the People’s Republic. Urban History, 41(4), 686–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C. (2008). China on the Move: Migration, the State, and the Household. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. S. G. (2014). Class in Contemporary China. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, M. P. (2005). Heritage, Local Communities and Economic Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 735–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical Approaches. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, S. J. (2007). State-Sponsored Gentrification Under Market Transition the Case of Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review, 43(2), 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (2011). Urban Modeling and Contemporary Technologies of City-Building in China: The Production of Regimes of Green Urbanisms. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global (pp. 55–76). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hsing, Y. T. (2010). The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS (International Council of Monuments and Sites). (1994). La Charte de Venise (The Venice Charter): 1964–1994. Paris: International Council of Monuments and Sites.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, R. G. (1990). The Chinese House: Craft, Symbol, and the Folk Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. K. (2007). Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space (Donald Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. B. (2005). For Space. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, A. (2009). Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. The China Quarterly, 200, 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, T. (2005). Historical Memory, Community-Building and Place-Making in Neighbourhood Shanghai. In F. L. Wu & L. J. C. Ma (Eds.), Restructuring the Chinese City: Changing Society, Economy and Space. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, T. (2011). Place Attachment, Communal Memory, and the Moral Underpinnings of Gentrification in Postreform Shanghai. In A. Kleinman (Ed.), Deep China: The Moral Life of the Person: What Anthropology and Psychiatry Tell Us About China Today (pp. 152–176). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Daily. (2002). Full Text of Jiang Zemin’s Report at 16th Party Congress. Published Online December 10, 2002. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from http://english.people.com.cn/200211/18/eng20021118_106985.shtml

  • People’s Daily. (2010). Li Qun Kaocha Laochengqu Baohu ji Chengshi Guihua [Li Qun Inspects the Preservation of the Old Town and City Planning]. Published Online August 3, 2010. Retrieved July 3, 2015, from http://qd.people.com.cn/GB/190560/135228 67.html

  • Potter, S. H., & Potter, J. (1990). China’s Peasants: The Anthropology of a Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qingdao Urban Planning Bureau. (2015). Xi Jinping Zongshuji Guanxin Lishi Wenwu Baohu Gongzuo Jishi [President Xi Jinping Shows His Concern for the State of Historical and Cultural Protection Work]. Published Online February 1, 2015. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://upb.qingdao.gov.cn/qdupb/news/69d42dc7-5d07-4f08-a83e-a2726e797350.shtml

  • Ren, X. F. (2008). Forward to the Past: Historical Preservation in Globalizing Shanghai. City & Community, 7(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Q. (2013). Shanghai Gone: Domicide and Defiance in a Chinese Megacity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, D. J. (2002). Labour Market Reform and the Plight of the Laid-Off Proletariat. The China Quarterly, 170, 304–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (1993). Conservation Policy Delivery. In M. G. H. Mac Lean (Ed.), Cultural Heritage in Asia and the Pacific, Conservation and Policy: Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Honolulu, Hawaii, September 8–13, 1991. Marina Del Rey, CA: The Getty Conservation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomba, L., & Cartier, C. (2012). Symbolic Cities and the ‘Cake Debate’. In G. R. Barmé (Ed.), China Story Yearbook 2012: Red Rising, Red Eclipse (pp. 30–55). Canberra: ANU College of Asia & the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wai, A. W. T. (2006). Place Promotion and Iconography in Shanghai’s Xintiandi. Habitat International, 30(2), 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P. (2004). Urban Poverty, Housing and Social Change in China. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. S. (Ed.). (1994). Memory, History, and Opposition Under State Socialism. Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. L. (Ed.). (2007). China’s Emerging Cities: The Making of New Urbanism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. L., Webster, C. J., He, S. J., & Liu, Y. T. (Eds.). (2010). Urban Poverty in China. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2006). Contesting Spatial Modernity in Late-Socialist China. Current Anthropology, 47(3), 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2010). In Search of Paradise: Middle-Class Living in a Chinese Metropolis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Rasiah, R. (2013). Qingdao. Cities, 31, 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Fang, K. (2004). Is History Repeating Itself? From Urban Renewal in the United States to Inner-City Redevelopment in China. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q. (2007). On Conservation: Historic District Conservation in China: Assessment and Prospects. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review XIX, 1, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. (2015). Cultural Effects of Authenticity: Contested Heritage Practices in China. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(6), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am deeply indebted to Prof. Dolores Koenig of the American University in Washington DC for the time and effort spent editing and commenting on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Demgenski, P. (2018). Living in the “Past”: The Effects of a Growing Preservation Discourse in Contemporary Urban China. In: Ding, Y., Marinelli, M., Zhang, X. (eds) China: A Historical Geography of the Urban. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64042-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64042-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64041-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64042-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics