Skip to main content

The Digital Arena

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 554 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture ((PSCMC))

Abstract

This chapter examines how fight pages have generated participatory modes of spectating bare-knuckle violence, and in doing so, have brokered agonistic publics where street justice and ​bare-knuckle brawling are valorized. Drawing on a content analysis of close to 6000 user comments posted on Crazy Street Fights, The Craziest Fights Ever, Just Fights Videos, Real Crazy Fights and Only Street Fighting, I examine why individuals commented on these pages, what they said when they did so, and how Facebook’s architecture might generate new criminologically significant socialities where criminal acts are legitimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given their heterogeneity, Robards and Bennett (2011) argue that it is more productive to conceptualize the emergence of such online collectives not through the lens of subcultural theory, but through post-subcultural theory, or as what Maffesoli (1996) terms neo-tribes.

  2. 2.

    One such practice of audience management is through carefully crafting a homepage persona. As Cheung (2004) notes, homepages provide individuals with a means of suppressing stigmatized or controversial facets of their identity through modifying their written self-narrative (see also Cover 2012). With its potential for offering a controlled narrative of the user, the homepage—represented by the personal account Timeline on Facebook—indicates that certain beliefs, preferences and attitudes are central to an individual’s identity. In this way, commenting represents a technique of writing the self, or ‘self-writing’ (Sauter 2014)—a technique that extends to commenting on other posts.

  3. 3.

    Indeed, Bourdieu (1990, 80) himself fleetingly mentions ‘the exchange of blows’ as an example of exchange in his own work, albeit without connecting it to his expanded understanding of capital .

Bibliography

  • Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29(1): 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L. (1977). Deviant behaviour: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2004). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asuncion, J. (2010). Reaction images. Know Your Meme. Retrieved October 15, 2016, from http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/reaction-images

  • Baym, N. K., & boyd, d. (2012). Socially mediated publicness: An introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3): 320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C. (2006/1819). On crimes and punishments. In A. Thomas (Ed.), On crimes and punishments and other writings. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2006a). Introduction: Cyberidentities. In D. Bell (Ed.), The cybercultures reader: Second edition. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2006b). Webs as pegs. In S. Herbrechter & M. Higgins (Eds.), Returning (to communities). New York, NY: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, S. (2014). Subcultural theory: An historical and contemporary assessment of the concept for understanding deviance. Deviant Behavior, 35(6): 496–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, B. (2012). The psychology of sharing: Why do people share online? The New York Times Customer Insight Group. Retrieved October 16, 2016, from http://nytmarketing.whsites.net/mediakit/pos/

  • Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (1999). Neighborhoods & crime. New York, NY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2008/1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. (2004). Identity construction and self-presentation on personal homepages: Emancipatory potentials and reality constraints. In D. Gauntlett & R. Horsley (Eds.), Web studies. London, UK: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbina, J. E., Like-Haislip, T. Z., & Miller, J. (2010). Gang fights versus cat fights: Urban young men’s gendered narratives of violence. Deviant Behaviour, 31(7): 596–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cover, R. (2012). Performing and undoing identity online: Social networking, identity theories and the incompatibility of online profiles and friendship regimes. Convergence, 18(2): 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (2010/1983). The society of the spectacle. Detroit, MI: Black & Red.

    Google Scholar 

  • Décary-Hétu, D., & Morselli, C. (2011). Gang presence in social network sites. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 5(2): 876–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Given time: I counterfeit money. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fileborn, B. (2014). Online activism and street harassment: Digital justice of shouting into the ether. Griffith Journal of Law and Human Dignity, 2(1): 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26: 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media Society, 15(8): 1348–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1956). Criminality theories and behavioural images. American Journal of Sociology, 61(5): 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. J. (2010). Policing’s new visibility. British Journal of Criminology, 50(5): 914–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. J., & Brewer, R. (2015). Digital drift and the criminal interaction order. Theoretical Criminology, 19(1): 112–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C. (2004). Crime, media and community: Grief and Virtual engagement in late modernity. In J. Ferrell, K. Hayward, W. Morrison, & M. Presdee (Eds.), Cultural criminology unleashed. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6): 633–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1): 109–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6): 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2): 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39: 1123–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, P. G. (2008). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online is inhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2): 434–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). Flaming in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, L. (1988). Sports crowds and the collective behaviour perspective. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints. London, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2010). I Tweet honestly, I Tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1): 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. London, UK: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2): 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosker, A. (2014). Trolling as provocation: YouTube’s agonistic publics. Convergence, 20(2): 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, M. J. (1993). Searching for sociability in the stands: A theory of sports spectating. Journal of Sport Management, 7(1): 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milivojevic, S., & McGovern, A. (2014). The death of Jill Meagher: Crime and punishment on social media. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(3): 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. I. (2005). Eye for an eye. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C., & Décary-Hétu, D. (2013). Crime facilitation purposes of social networking sites: A review and analysis of the ‘cyberbanging’ phenomenon. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 24(1): 152–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009a). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1): 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2009b). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media & Society, 11(1–2): 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2005). ‘Dude, You’re a Fag’: Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities, 8(3): 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. (2015). Seeking rape justice: Formal and informal responses to sexual violence through technosocial counter-publics. Theoretical Criminology, 19(4): 571–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrooz, D. C., Decker, S. H., & Moule, R. K. (2015). Criminal and routine activities in online settings: Gangs, offenders, and the Internet. Justice Quarterly, 32(3): 471–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riches, R. (1986). The phenomenon of violence. In D. Riches (Ed.), The anthropology of violence. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards, B., & Bennett, A. (2011). MyTribe: Post-subcultural manifestations of belonging on social network sites. Sociology, 45(2): 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, K. (1999). Against virtual community: For a politics of distance. Angelaki, 4(2): 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The ‘false consensus effect’: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3): 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. (2011). Teen in court over series of random attacks in CBD. Herald Sun, February 28. Retrieved October 16, 2016, from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/teen-in-court-over-series-of-random-violent-attacks-in-cbd/story-e6frf7kx-1226013597129

  • Rowe, C. (2009). E-mail play and accelerated change. In C. Rowe & E. L. Wyss (Eds.), Language and new media: Linguistic, cultural, and technological evolutions. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2013). Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime Media Culture, 9(3): 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2016). ‘Real men don’t hit women’: Constructing masculinity in the prevention of violence against women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(4): 463–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, S. (2008). Street capital: Ethnicity and violence on the streets of Oslo. Theoretical Criminology, 12(2): 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, T. (2014). ‘What’s on your mind?’ Writing on Facebook as a tool for self-formation. New Media & Society, 16(5): 823–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandorf, M. (2012). Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence, 19(3): 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, K. (2010). Crime, culture and violence: Understanding how masculinity and identity shapes offending. Bowen Hills, Australia: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the ‘social’ in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer mediated communication. London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, J. (2005). Media reception studies. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3): 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trahan, A. (2011). Qualitative research and intersectionality. Critical Criminology, 19(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, J. (2012). Facebook and the engineering of connectivity: A multi-layered approach to social media platforms. Convergence, 19(2): 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. J. D. (1995). Pugs at work: Bodily capital and bodily labour among professional boxers. Body and Society, 1(1): 65–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K. (2013). Participatory promises: Living through resistance at the theater. Theater, 43(3): 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P. O. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. Lahey, T. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), The causes of conduct disorder and serious juvenile delinquency. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2006). Virtually criminal: Crime, deviance and regulation online. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. (1997). Community in the abstract: A political and ethical dilemma. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. A. (2016). ‘I just wanna see someone get knocked the fuck out’: Spectating affray on Facebook fight pages. Crime Media Culture. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016667437

  • Wood, M. A. (2017). Antisocial media and algorithmic deviancy amplification: Analysing the id of Facebook’s technological unconscious. Theoretical Criminology, 21(2): 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, G. M., & Messner, S. F. (2011). Neighborhood context and nonlinear peer effects on adolescent violent crime. Criminology, 49(3): 873–903.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wood, M.A. (2018). The Digital Arena. In: Antisocial Media. Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63985-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63985-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63984-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63985-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics