Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below pp 129–152Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Demand for Healthcare Reform by Public Opinion and Medical Professionals: A Comparative Survey Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

To cope with rising healthcare costs, healthcare systems in advanced welfare states are undergoing quite significant changes including privatization and the introduction of private co-payments. This chapter argues that public opinion and doctors’ preferences are key to understand the reform potential of healthcare systems. It provides an empirical study of public and doctors’ satisfaction with the existing healthcare system in 11 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the Unites States). The study shows that doctors are less status quo oriented than the public. It seems that not medical professionals but rather the public is a potential veto player blocking reforms. The Netherlands and Britain are the countries with the lowest level of reform demand, possibly because they have experienced a long period of large-scale health reforms. The USA represents the other extreme with widespread reform demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bleich, S.N., E. Özaltin, and C.J.L. Murray. 2009. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87 (4): 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M., and J. Quadagno. 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies. A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blendon, R.J., C. Schoen, C. DesRoches, R. Osborn, and K. Zapert. 2003. Common concerns amid diverse systems. Health care experiences in five countries. Health Affairs 22 (3): 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calnan, M.W., and E. Sanford. 2004. Public trust in health care. The system or the doctor? Quality and Safety in Health Care 13 (2): 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. 1996. Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. Social Science & Medicine 42 (7): 1085–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Observatory. 2017. The health systems and policy monitor. Accessed 28 March 2017. http://hspm.org/

  • Footman, K., B. Roberts, A. Mills, E. Richardson, and M. McKee. 2013. Public satisfaction as a measure of health system performance. A study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union. Health Policy 112 (1): 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., and M. Moran. 2000. Reforming health care in Europe. West European Politics 23 (2): 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geissler, A., W. Quentin, D. Scheller-Kreinsen, and R. Busse. 2011. Introduction to DRGs in Europe. Common objectives across different hospital systems. In Diagnosis-related groups in Europe. Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals, ed. R. Busse, A. Geissler, W. Quentin, and M. Wiley. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, J., J. Gelissen, W. Arts, and R. Muffels. 2000. Public health care in the balance. Exploring popular support for health care systems in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare 9 (4): 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaimo, S., and P. Manow. 1999. Adapting the welfare state. The case of health care reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Comparative Political Studies 32 (8): 967–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A., and M.C. Dornan. 1990. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care. A meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine 30 (7): 811–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A., D.L. Roter, and N.R. Katz. 1988. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Medical Care 26 (7): 657–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E.M. 1990. Institutions, veto points, and policy results. A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy 10 (4): 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M.K., R.J. Blendon, and J.M. Benson. 2013. What is driving people’s dissatisfaction with their own health care in 17 Latin American countries? Health Expectations 16 (2): 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, J., and C. Wendt. 2004. Satisfaction with health care systems. In Challenges for quality of life in the contemporary world. Advances in quality-of-life studies, theory and research, ed. W. Glatzer, S. Below, and M. Stoffregen. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J.D. 1999. Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe. Politics & Society 27 (2): 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malat, J. 2001. Social distance and patients’ rating of healthcare providers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42 (4): 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. 2001. Comparative institutional advantages of welfare state regimes and new coalitions in welfare state reforms. In the new politics of the welfare state, ed. P. Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missinne, S., B. Meuleman, and P. Bracke. 2013. The popular legitimacy of European healthcare systems. A multilevel analysis of 24 countries. Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossialos, E. 1997. Citizens’ views on health care systems in the 15 member states of the European Union. Health Economics 6 (2): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, N., and J. Duckett. 2015. Explaining public satisfaction with health-care systems. Findings from a nationwide survey in China. Health Expectations 19 (3): 654–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. OECD health statistics. Accessed 28 March 2017. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_REAC

  • Papadakis, E., and C. Bean. 1993. Popular support for the welfare state. A comparison between institutional regimes. Journal of Public Policy 13 (3): 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolas, I., J. Cylus, and P.C. Smith. 2013a. An analysis of survey data from eleven countries finds that ‘satisfaction’ with health system performance means many things. Health Affairs 32 (4): 734–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolas, I., D. Kringos, N.S. Klazinga, and P.C. Smith. 2013b. Health system performance comparison. New directions in research and policy. Health Policy 112 (1): 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., ed. 2001. The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, J. 2006. One nation, uninsured. Why the US has no national health insurance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reibling, N. 2010. Healthcare systems in Europe. Towards an incorporation of patient access. Journal of European Social Policy 20 (1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothgang, H., M. Cacace, L. Frisina, S. Grimmeisen, A. Schmid, and C. Wendt, eds. 2010. The state and healthcare. Comparing OECD countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. 2001. The universal welfare state as a social dilemma. Rationality and Society 13 (2): 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, C., R. Osborn, D. Squires, M. Doty, P. Rasmussen, R. Pierson, and S. Applebaum. 2012. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Affairs 31 (12): 2805–2816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S., and J. Watts. 1995. ‘It’s the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive national health insurance always fails in America. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 20 (2): 329–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, C., and J. Kohl. 2010. Translating monetary inputs into health care provision. A comparative analysis of the impact of different modes of public policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 12 (1–2): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, C., J. Kohl, M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2010. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, C., M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer. 2011. Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seminar für Sozialwissenschaften, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Claus Wendt

  2. SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Elias Naumann

Authors
  1. Claus Wendt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elias Naumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Bernhard Ebbinghaus

  2. SFB 884 “Political Economy of Reforms”, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Elias Naumann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wendt, C., Naumann, E. (2018). Demand for Healthcare Reform by Public Opinion and Medical Professionals: A Comparative Survey Analysis. In: Ebbinghaus, B., Naumann, E. (eds) Welfare State Reforms Seen from Below. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63652-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63651-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63652-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation