Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisions After Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery

  • 1399 Accesses

Abstract

Breast reconstruction (BR) is currently considered an integral part of breast cancer treatment. Various oncologic factors, such as tumor size and lymph node status as well as the type of sequelae in already operated patients, determine the approach that should be taken and the technique to be used after preparing a detailed report of the procedure and considering the patient’s preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spear S (2016) Underpromise. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1961–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A et al (1998) Cosmetic sequalae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 41:471–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM et al (2014) A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg 72(2):145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, Couturaud B et al (2010) Management of the post breast conservation therapy defect: extended follow-up and reclassification. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:783–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spear SL, Shuck J, Hannan L et al (2014) Evaluating longterm outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction in the irradiated breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:605e–614e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL (2009) Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:395–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barry M, Kell MR (2011) Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:15–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spear SL, Seruya M, Rao SS et al (2012) Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rancati A, Pestalardo C, González E., Vidal L. Fat transfer in the delayed breast reconstruction after radiated mastectomy. IPRAS Journal. April 2012, P. 30. www.ipras.org

  13. González E (2012) Utilidad de la lipotransferencia autóloga para corregir los defectos de la cirugía oncológica y oncoplástica mamaria y radioterapia. Rev Venez Oncol 24(3):256–269

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amir A, Silfen R, Hauben DJ (2000) “Apron” flap and re-creation of the inframammary fold following TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1024–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroll S (2000) Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. Art and artistry. Chapter 20. Breast mound revision surgery. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 293–311

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mastology Department, Instituto de Oncología Angel H. Roffo, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Eduardo Gonzalez & Gastón Berman

Authors
  1. Eduardo Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gastón Berman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Our Lady of Grace Hospital, Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil

    Cicero Urban

  2. Plastic and Reconstructive Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Mario Rietjens

  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA

    Mahmoud El-Tamer

  4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA

    Virgilio S. Sacchini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gonzalez, E., Berman, G. (2019). Revisions After Breast Reconstruction. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M., El-Tamer, M., Sacchini, V.S. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62927-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation