Skip to main content

Abstract

Although rupture is one of the main causes of implant removal, its real rate is difficult to quantify, especially in breast reconstruction. Most of the ruptures have no obvious traumatic origin and are silent or intracapsular, thus asymptomatic, and with a difficult diagnosis with conventional exams (mammogram and ultrasound). Magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate method for implant failure diagnosis, but long-term cohort studies are necessary to evaluate integrity rates of these devices to better support their indications, follow-up, and limits in breast reconstruction. The aim of this chapter was to address the incidence, evaluation, and management of implant rupture in breast reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shestak KC (ed) (2006) Reoperative plastic surgery of the breast. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lotan AM, Retchkiman M, Tuchman I et al (2016) Analysis of 109 consecutive explanted breast implants: correlation between suspected implant rupture and surgical findings. Aesthet Plast Surg 40:739–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Handel N, Garcia ME, Wixtrom R (2013) Breast implant rupture: causes, incidence, clinical impact, and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1128–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rella L, Telegrafo M, Nardone A et al (2015) MRI evaluation of post-mastectomy irradiated breast implants: prevalence and analysis of complications. Clin Radiol 70:948–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hölmich LR, Vejborg IM, Conrad C et al (2004) Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Juanpere S, Perez E, Huc O et al (2011) Imaging breast implants—a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2(6):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernandes MJG, Milena GL, Carazo ER (2016) Subacute silicone pneumonitis after silent rupture of breast implant. Arch Bronconeumol 52(7):397–398

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oh JH, Song SY, Lew DH et al (2016) Distant migration of multiple siliconomas in lower extremities following breast implant rupture: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee BT, Duggan MM, Keenan MT et al (2011) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Registration in medicine expert panel on immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer: executive summary, June 2011. J Am Coll Surg 213(6):800–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:768–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heneghan C (2012) The saga of Poly Implant Prosthèse breast implants. BMJ 344:e306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nathan B, Meleagros L, Mashhadi S et al (2015) The breast implant rupture warranty: what is it really worth? Aesthet Plast Surg 39:826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedén P, Nava MB, van Tetering JPB et al (2006) Prevalence of rupture in Inamed silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haws MJ, Alizadeh K, Kaufaman DL (2015) Sientra primary and revision augmentation rupture trending and analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. Aesthet Surg J 35(S1):S33–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hölmich LR, Friis S, Fryzek JP et al (2003) Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture. Arch Surg 138:801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Murphy DK, Walker PS (2007) The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 59:569–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Puskas JE, Luebbers MT (2012) Breast implants: the good, the bad and the ugly. Can nanotechnology improve implants? WIREs Nanomed Natobiotechnol 4:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marotta JS, Goldberg EP, Habal MB et al (2002) Silicone gel breast implant failure: evaluation of properties of shells and gels for explanted prostheses and meta-analyses of literature rupture data. Ann Plast Surg 49:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slavin SA, Goldwyn RM (1995) Silicone gel implant explantation: reasons, results and admonitions. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henriksen TF, Frysek JP, Hölmich LB et al (2005) Reconstructive breast implantation after mastectomy for breast cancer. Arch Surg 140:1152–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rochira D, Cavalcanti P, Ottaviani A et al (2016) Longitudinal ultrasound study of breast implant rupture over a six-year interval. Ann Plast Surg 76(2):150–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, Venta ER, Izquierdo R, Angelats J (1996) Sonographic signs of breast implant rupture. Am J Roentgeno 166:1413–1419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT, Bostwick III, Mukudan S, Hester TR (1994) MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence. AJR 163:51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gorczyca DP, Gorczyca SM, Gorczyca KL (2007) The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:49S–61S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seiler SJ, Sharma PB, Hayes JC et al (2017) Multimodality imagingbased evaluation of singlelumen silicone breast implants for rupture. Radiographics 37(2):366–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rietjens M, Villa G, Toesca A et al (2014) Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:13e–20e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nahabedian MY (2014) Discussion: appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:21e–23e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Glazebrook KN, Leng S, Jacobson SR et al (2016) Dual-energy CT for evaluation of intra- and extracapsular silicone implant rupture. Case Rep Radiol 2016:6323709 4 pages

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Urban, C., Resende, M., Mansani, F.P., Rietjens, M. (2019). Implant Rupture. In: Urban, C., Rietjens, M., El-Tamer, M., Sacchini, V.S. (eds) Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62927-8_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62925-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62927-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics