Skip to main content

Towards Inclusive Social Identities in the Republic of Macedonia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping Social Identities After Violent Conflict

Abstract

Given the history of inter-ethnic tensions in Macedonia, this chapter is focused on the salience of ethnic, religious, and national identities among the youth. Both young Albanians and Macedonians perceive a clear distinction between Us (Albanians/Muslim or Macedonian/Orthodox) and Them, along both ethnic and religious lines. The youth who have local minority status (Albanians from Skopje and Macedonians from Tetovo) have a greater opportunity to meet local majority group members, especially in formal settings. However, results indicate an evident separation of these groups in everyday life in both cities. In both groups, the strength of ethnic identification is negatively related to the quality of contacts with members of the ethnic outgroup. The findings are discussed through their importance for social identity inclusiveness and complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Macedonians, these identities are Macedonian (ethnicity), Orthodox (religion), and Macedonian (nationality), while for the Albanians, they are Albanian (ethnicity), Muslim (religion), and Macedonian (nationality).

  2. 2.

    Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is a provisional reference to Macedonia, a result of an interim accord between Greece and Macedonia in a dispute over the country’s name. Ethnic Macedonians often use it unofficially as a derogative term (Markowska & Wisiniewski, 2009).

  3. 3.

    “Besa” is a norm in ethnic Albanian communities, usually translated as “faith” or “word of honor,” meaning that the a person is obliged to keep their promises.

References

  • Anastasovski, I., Aleksovska Velichkovska, L., Zivkovic, V., & Ajdini, N. (2013). Impact of ethnicity of the citizens of the Republic of Macedonia for organization and function of sport and organization. International Journal of Scientific Issues in Physical Education, Sport and Health, 2, 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasovski, I., & Stojanoska, T. (2010). Violence, aggression and sport. Skopje: Faculty of Physical Culture. Kumanovo: Fleksograf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Петроска-Бешка, В., & Кениг, Н. (2002). Сликата за сопствениот и за другиот етникум кај македонските и албанските студенти на Педагошкиот факултет во Скопје. Зборник на Филозофскиот факултет-Скопје [The image for the own and the other ethnicity among the Macedonian and Albanian students of Pedagogical Faculty in Skopje]. Proceedings of the Faculty of Philosophy, (55), 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. (2009). Motivations underlying ingroup identification: Optimal distinctiveness and beyond. In S. Otten & T. Kessler (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 3–22). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., Gonsalkorale, K., & van Dommelen, A. (2013). Social identity complexity: Comparing majority and minority ethnic group members in a multicultural society. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of population, households and dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia. (2002). Book X. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gov.mk/publikacii/knigax.pdf

  • Fritzhand, A., & Blazevska-Stoilkovska, B. (2016). Social dominance and trust in institutions among Macedonian and Albanian young adults. Security Dialogues, 7(1), 7–23. Skopje: Faculty of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, F. A., & Bachman, M. C. (1993). The common in-group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common group identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hristova, L., & Cekik, A. (2013). Between the ethnic and the civic identity—On the perceptions of the student population in the Republic of Macedonia. New Balkan Politics, 13, 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jashari, H. (2005). The other in media. Skopje: Open Institute Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, K. J. (2009). Interventions enhancing intergroup tolerance. In S. Otten & T. Kessler (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 284–303). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenig, N. (2003). Етничкиот идентитет и персоналната ориентација: поврзаност меѓу димензијата колективизам-индивидуализам, вреднувањето на етничките симболи и емпатската идентификација [Ethnic identity and personal orientation: Collectivism-individualism, evaluation of ethnic symbols and empathetic identification]. Annual Scientific Papers’ Archive of the Faculty of Philosophy, 56, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesnikovski, L. (2011). Macedonians ontological insecurity and the challenges of stabilizing inter-ethnic relations. Eurasia Border Review, 2, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowska, J., & Wisniewski, J. (2009). Republic of Macedonia and the European integration process—Possibilities and realities. In M. Sobczyński (Ed.), Historical regions divided by the borders (No. 9, vol. 1, p. 127). Łódź: University of Łódź, Department of Political Geography and Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajaziti, A., Sela, Y., & Trajkovska, J. (2015). Multiculturalism in the Republic of Macedonia: Case study—Kumanovo. Skopje: ISPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroska-Beshka, V., & Kenig, N. (2002). Сликата за сопствениот и за другиот етникум кај студентите на Педагошкиот факултет во Скопје. [Their own and others ethnicity image among students at the Faculty of Education in Skopje]. Annual Scientific Papers’ Archive of the Faculty of Philosophy, 55, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroska-Beshka, V., & Kenig, N. (2009). The ethnic conflict in Macedonia from the Ethnic Macedonians’ perspective. In J. Carter, G. Irani, & V. D. Volkan (Eds.), Regional and ethnic conflicts: Perspectives from the front lines (pp. 9–18). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroska-Beshka, V., Popovski, M., & Kenig, N. (1999). Етничките стереотипи кај идните вспитувачи и одделенски наставници [Ethnic stereotypes among future pre-school and primary school teachers]. Annual Scientific Papers’ Archive of the Faculty of Philosophy, 52, 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reka, B. (2011). The Ohrid Framework Agreement—A new political philosophy for the functioning of a multi-ethnic state. In B. Reka (Ed.), Ten years from the Ohrid Framework Agreement: Is Macedonia functioning as a multi-ethnic state? (pp. 11–19). Tetovo: SEEU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology and intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tankersley, D. (2001). Bombs or bilingual programmes? Dual-language immersion, transformative education and community building in Macedonia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dommelen, A., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Gonsalkorale, K., & Brewer, M. (2015). Construing multiple in-groups: Assessing social identity inclusiveness and structure in ethnic and religious minority group members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten, M. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2016). Dual identity, in-group projection, and out-group feelings among ethnic minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C. (2009). Cross-group contact effects. In S. Otten & T. Kessler (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 262–283). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. C., Brody, S. M., & Aron, A. (2004). Intergroup contact: Still our best hope for improving intergroup relations. In C. S. Crandall & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 119–146). Lawrence: Lewinian Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pajaziti, A., Blaževska-Stoilkovska, B., Fritzhand, A., Rustemi, A., Qose, A. (2017). Towards Inclusive Social Identities in the Republic of Macedonia. In: Pratto, F., Žeželj, I., Maloku, E., Turjačanin, V., Branković, M. (eds) Shaping Social Identities After Violent Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62021-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics