Skip to main content

Nipple-Areola Complex Replantation After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction

Abstract

Traditionally, the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is resected during mastectomy. The NAC determinates aesthetic outcome after breast reconstruction, and a natural-looking NAC can barely be reconstructed with other tissues. The aim was to assess the oncological safety as well as morbidity and aesthetic outcome after replantation of the NAC. Retrospective analysis of 85 patients receiving 88 mastectomies and IBR was conducted. NAC (n = 29) or the nipple alone (n = 23) was replanted 7 days (median, range 2–10 days) after IBR in 49 patients. Malignant involvement of the subareolar tissue was found in eight cases (9.1%). In 69% and 26% of the cases, total or partial necrosis occurred if the entire NAC or only the nipple were replanted, respectively (P <0.01). Depigmentation was seen in 52%, and corrective surgery was done in 11 out of 52 NAC or nipple replantations. Local recurrence and isolated regional lymph node metastasis were observed in one single case each. It can be concluded that the replantation of the NAC in IBR is oncologically safe. However, the long-term aesthetic outcome of NAC replantation is not satisfying, which advocates replanting the nipple alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McCormick B, Wrigth J, Cordiero P. Breast reconstruction combined with radiation therapy: long-term risks and factors related to decision making. Cancer J. 2008;14:264–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hudson DA, Skoll PJ. Single-stage, autologous breast restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1163–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Sclafani L, Buchanan C, Fey JV, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Cordeiro PG. Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:381–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH, Bostwick J, Murray DR, Staley CA, Wood WC. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:108–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, Ames FC, Wang BG, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:421–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, La Trenta GS, Swistel A, Christos P, Osborne MP. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:676–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:1048–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen JA, Gram JB, Pallesen RM. Involvement of the nipple and areola in breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15:39–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perry RG, Cochran TC, Wolfort FG. When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:535–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziswiler-Gietz J, Makrodimou M, Harder Y, Banic A, Erni D. Outcome analysis of breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138:114–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areolar reconstructions: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:780–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson DA, Dent DM, Lazarus D. One-stage immediate breast and nipple-areolar reconstruction with autologous tissue I: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;45:471–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb G, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Banerjee A, Gupta S, Bhattacharya N. Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in breast cancer – a clinicopathological assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1195–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:240–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Kroll SS, Ames FC, Ross MI, Feig BW, Singletary SE. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:620–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenway RM, Schlossberg L, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:933–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meretoja TJ, von Smitten KAJ, Leidenius MH, Svarvar C, Heikkilä PS, Jahkola TA. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-years series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:1142–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Müller H, Küchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncological safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hikino H, Kodama K, Yasui K, Ozaki N, Nagaoka S, Miura H. Intracystic adenomyoepithelioma of the breast—case report and review. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:429–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patani N, Mokbel K. Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:391–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael Wirth M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wirth, R., Banic, A., Erni, D. (2018). Nipple-Areola Complex Replantation After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_83

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60924-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60925-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics