Abstract
Nipple reconstruction is often viewed as the final stage of breast reconstruction. It is the proverbial cherry on top and a defining characteristic of a completed breast reconstruction, depending on the desires of the patient. The topic of nipple reconstruction has often focused on optimizing technique not only for an aesthetically pleasing reconstruction but also with great focus on creating and maintaining nipple projection. The authors pursued evaluation of nipple reconstruction as a source of morbidity in the setting of radiotherapy after implant-based breast reconstruction. Given the variability of postoperative results in breast reconstruction after radiotherapy, we targeted a population of female patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction and bilateral nipple reconstruction with unilateral radiotherapy. Our findings demonstrate that nipple reconstruction is a safe procedure; however, the setting of an irradiated field increases the complication rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:780e6.
Shestak KC, Nguyen TD. The double opposing periareola flap: a novel concept for nipple-areola reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:473e80.
Jones AP, Erdmann M. Projection and patient satisfaction using the “Hamburger” nipple reconstruction technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:207e12.
Rosing JH, Momeni A, Kamperman K, Kahn D, Gurtner G, Lee GK. Effectiveness of the Asteame Nipple Guard(TM) in maintaining projection following nipple reconstruction: a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(10):1592e6.
Eo S, Kim SS, Da Lio AL. Nipple reconstruction with C-v flap using dermofat graft. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:137e40.
Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591e5.
Draper LB, Bui DT, Chiu ES, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ. Nipple-areola reconstruction following chest-wall irradiation for breast cancer: is it safe? Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:12e5.
Momeni A, Ghaly M, Gupta D, Karanas YL, Kahn DM, Gurtner GC, Lee GK. Nipple reconstruction: risk factors and complications after 189 procedures. Eur J Plast Surg. 2013;36(10):633–8.
Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, Brandt KR, Pruthi S, Chute CG, Olson JE, Couch FJ, Ingle JN, Goetz MP. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082e8.
Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, Graff JJ, Katz SJ. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;302:1551e6.
Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I, Godbold JH, Estabrook A, Smith SR. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:881e5.
Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of reexcision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1297e303.
Kotwall C, Ranson M, Stiles A, Hamann MS. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision. Am Surg. 2007;73:337e43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moshrefi, S., Momeni, A., Lee, G.K., Kahn, D. (2018). Nipple Reconstruction After Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A “Matched-Pair” Outcome Analysis Focusing on the Effects of Radiotherapy. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_82
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60925-6_82
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60924-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60925-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)