Abstract
Doing scientific research is, in theory, a systematic and well-organised enterprise. In reality, however, things often go astray: field works get cancelled, interviews get side-tracked and participants drop out. The investigation of human lives, as it turns out, cannot do away with the messiness of human lives. In such cases, researchers must adapt to the new situation and yet stay on topic: in one word, they need to improvise. How, then, does research remain scientific? What matters is what is done afterwards; how hunches and surprises are turned into systematic investigations, analyses and interpretations. This argument will be illustrated with the story of an ‘impromptu’ fieldwork and its unpredictable consequences; or, rather, how staying on topic requires one to systematically stray away from it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Billig, M. (2013). Learn to write badly. How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2012). Qualitative research between craftsmanship and McDonaldization. A keynote address from the 17th qualitative health research conference. Qualitative Studies, 3(1), 56–68.
Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2009). A pragmatist approach to the problem of knowledge in health psychology. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 800–809. doi:10.1177/1359105309338974.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2014). “I would rather be hanged than to agree with you!”: Collective memory and the definition of the nation in parliamentary debates on immigration. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 15, 22–53.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2015). Dialogue and debate in psychology: Commentary on the foundational myth of psychology as a science. In J. Cresswell, A. Haye, A. Larrain, M. Morgan, & G. Sullivan (Eds.), Dialogue and debate in the making of theoretical psychology (pp. 231–239). Concord: Captus University Publications.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2017). Personal trajectories, collective memories. Remembering and the life-course. Culture & Psychology 23(2), 263–279.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (in press). Trajectories of resistance and historical reflections. In N. Chaudhary, G. Marsico, P. Hviid, & J. Villadsen (Eds.), Resistance in everyday life: Constructing cultural experiences. Singapore: Springer.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (Submitted-a). Historical reasoning: A cultural psychology perspective on emergence in collective memory. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.
de Saint-Laurent, C. (Submitted-b). Collective memory beyond memory: Psychosocial processes in historical reasoning.
de Saint-Laurent, C., & Zittoun, T. (in press). Memory in life transitions. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Handbook of memory and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Favero, P. (2010). Italians, the “good people”: Reflections on national self-representation in contemporary Italian debates on xenophobia and war. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 12(2), 138–153.
Glaveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking through creativity and culture: Toward an integrated model (1st ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
James, W. (1922). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York/London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Nicholson, C. (2016). The role of historical representations in Israeli-Palestinian relations: Narratives from abroad. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(1), 5–11. doi:10.1037/pac0000143.
Pierce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1–15. doi:10.7135/UPO9780857286512.036.
Rosenstein, A. (2014). Décris-Ravage. Brussels: Théâtre Océan Nord.
Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. The Narrative Study of Lives, 1(1), 59–91.
Valsiner, J. (2014). Needed for cultural psychology: Methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 3–30. doi:10.1177/1354067X13515941.
Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J., & Batiashvili, N. (2012). Mnemonic communities and conflict: Georgia’s narrative template. In I. Marková & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Trust and conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue. London/New York: Routledge.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Zittoun, T. (2012). Lifecourse: A socio-cultural perspective. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 513–535). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2018). Staying on Topic: Doing Research Between Improvisation and Systematisation. In: Wegener, C., Meier, N., Maslo, E. (eds) Cultivating Creativity in Methodology and Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60216-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60216-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60216-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)