Abstract
By presenting three unedited narratives embedded in different contexts, this chapter demonstrates how research on distributed leadership (DL) inadequately addresses DL’s holistic quality, side-lining its discourse, while fueling irrelevant assumptions and myths about it. DL is less about the idea that everyone is a leader and more about a choice in attitude of leadership. It is a leader’s attitude for a more collaborative form of leadership that embraces diversity and good governance, while recognizing the complexities of informed and effective decision-making. DL is also a reciprocal expression of organizational agility. DL as a hybrid form of leadership, engaging followers in all or parts of the organization demonstrating inclusive leadership that respects formal power and the individual leader is observed. The fact that the narratives take place in three different settings—a hierarchical public university, a flat structure technology company, and a networked distribution organization—mitigates and transgresses the sometimes overstated importance of structure and industry. DL illustrates the followership–leadership dichotomy, one that is complementary and of mutual engagement. In short, DL is guided by a purposeful leadership focus (“why”) and is underlined by how the “how” in leadership is implemented. The “what” is done and the “who” does it are secondary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251–269.
Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 28, 317–338.
O’Toole, J., Galbraith, J., & Lawler, E. (2003). When two (or more) heads are better than one: The promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 250–267). London: Sage.
Pearce, C. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47–57.
Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chatwani, N. (2018). Followership Engagement in Hybrid Distributed Leadership. In: Chatwani, N. (eds) Distributed Leadership. Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59581-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59581-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59580-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59581-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)