Skip to main content

Solitary Myoma: Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uterine Fibroids
  • 821 Accesses

Abstract

Twenty-seven year-old presents with menorrhagia and is found to have a 3.5 cm intramural fibroid. She desires fertility in the future. She elects medical management with oral contraceptive pills at this time. She returns 14 months later with significant pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, and anemia with hemoglobin of 7.2 g/dL, and ultrasound reveals the fibroid has increased in size to 9 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parker WH, YS F, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(3):414.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peddada SD, Laughlin SK, Miner K, Guyon JP, Haneke K, Vahdat HL, Semelka RC, Kowalik A, Armao D, Davis B, Baird DD. Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(50):19887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. DeWaay DJ, Syrop CH, Nygaard IE, Davis WA, Van Voorhis BJ. Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(1):3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawaura N, Ito F, Ichimura T, Shibata S, Tsujimura A, Minakuchi K, Ishiko O, Ogita S. Transient rapid growth of uterine leiomyoma in a postmenopausal woman. Oncol Rep. 1999;6(6):1289.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baird DD, Garrett TA, Laughlin SK, Davis B, Semelka RC, Peddada SD. Short-term change in growth of uterine leiomyoma: tumor growth spurts. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagai T, Takai Y, Akahori T, et al. Highly improved accuracy of the revised PREoperative sarcoma score (rPRESS) in the decision of performing surgery for patients presenting with a uterine mass. Spring. 2015;4:520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JD, Tergas MD, Cui R, et al. Use of electric power morcellation and prevalence of underlying cancer in women who undergo myomectomy. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):69–77. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goto A, Takeuchi S, Sugimura K, Maruo T. Usefulness of Gd-DTPA contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI and serum determination of LDH and its isozymes in the differential diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12(4):254–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Venkatraman E, et al. Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence of distinct tumor behavior. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skorstad M, Kent A, Lieng M. Preoperative evaluation in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma. A nation-wide cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(11):1228–34. doi:10.1111/aogs.13008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato K, Yuasa N, Fujita M, Fukushima Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):368.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD005355.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(1):5–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M, et al. Adhesions formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. Adhesion-prevention effects of fibrin sealants after laparoscopic myomectomy as determined by second-look laparoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(8):571–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C, et al. Barrier agents for preventing adhesions after surgery fro subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD000475.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, et al. Association between uterine repair at laparoscopic myomectomy and postoperative adhesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(3):331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(12):2663–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD003857.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(4):933–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Reproductive outcome before and after laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy for subserous or intramural myomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110(2):215–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):698–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis EI, Srouji SS, Gargiulo AR. Robotic single-site myomectomy: an initial report and technique. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1370–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gargiulo AR, Choussein S, Srouji SS, Cedo LE, Escobar PF. Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):27–35. doi:10.1007/s11701-016-0603-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tulandi T, Einarsson JI. The use of barbed suture for laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(2):210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Ma D, Zhang Q. Role of barbed suture in repairing uterine wall defects in laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(5):684–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stacey Scheib MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

(MOV 460405 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheib, S. (2018). Solitary Myoma: Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Surgery. In: Moawad, N. (eds) Uterine Fibroids. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58780-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58780-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58779-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58780-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics