Abstract
Hungary, similarly to other post-socialist countries, does not regulate the gender diversity of companies, and this leads to women’s serious underrepresentation on corporate boards. The historical aversion to central regulation of social matters derives from the legacy of forced emancipation in the socialist period. This chapter discusses the contradictory impact of forced emancipation in Hungary and the limited probability of introducing legal regulations regarding gender diversity. It gives a thorough overview of present legal regulations, contains statistical data on gender representation on company boards and also includes an expert interview on the possible solutions to increase women’s participation. The research findings show that the socialist state prioritised women’s emancipation, many institutions were established to facilitate women’s full-time labour force participation and the figure of female managers was well-known. However, socialism lost its positive connotations in public discourse shortly after the system change, and delegitimised the issues connected to gender equality in political and policy fields. Consequently, the unsupportive social environment and the conservative turn in the Hungarian gender culture have not encouraged any changes in the legal framework. Moreover, the expert interviewee questions the importance and utility of legal regulations. At present, the most influential way to spread gender equality remains the internationalisation of companies: EU-driven policy and legal frames and multinational companies might promote gender equality in management and on corporate boards.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Andrea Jádi-Németh, Dr. Helga Hutter, Katalin Novák and Dr. Katalin Prandler for the support and information they offered us on the issue investigated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angyal, Á. (2001). Vállalati kormányzás [Corporate governance]. Budapest: Aula.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Czajlik, I., & Vincze, J. (2004). Corporate law and corporate governance. The Hungarian experience (KTK/IE discussion paper 2004/11). Institute of Economics Hungarian Academy of Sciences. http://econ.core.hu/doc/dp/dp/mtdp0411.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2016.
European Commission. (2012). Women in economic decision-making in the EU: Progress report. A Europe 2020 initiative. Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2838/65541
European Commission. (2013). Barcelona objectives. The development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth. Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2838/43161
European Commission. (2016a). Gender balance on corporate boards. Europe is cracking the glass ceiling. Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_balance_decision_making/1607_factsheet_final_wob_data_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.
European Commission. (2016b). Country report Hungary 2016 including an in-depth review on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances. Commission Staff Working Document. SWD(2016) 85 final. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2016/cr2016_hungary_en.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2016.
European Commission. (2016c). Report on equality between women and men 2015. European Union. doi:10.2838/14515
European Commission. (2016d). She figures 2015. gender in research and innovation. Luxembourg: European Union. doi:10.2777/744106
Eurostat. (2016). Employment statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics. Accessed 18 July 2016.
EWSDGE. (2016). Women shareholders demand gender equality. Project Report. http://www.ewsdge.eu/
Fodor, É. (2004). The state socialist emancipation project: Gender inequality in workplace authority in Hungary and Austria. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29(3), 783–813. doi:10.1086/381103
Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism: A comparative-historical essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Glass, C., & Fodor, É. (2011). Public maternalism goes to market recruitment, hiring, and promotion in postsocialist Hungary. Gender & Society, 25(1), 5–26. doi:10.1177/0891243210390518
HBLF. (2014). 202020 club research on gender equality among the TOP200 companies in 2014. Hungarian Business Leaders Forum, Carried out by BISNODE, under the supervision of Beáta Nagy.
Hungary Economic Outlook. (2016). Hungary economic outlook July 5. http://www.focus-economics.com/countries/hungary. Accessed 5 July 2016.
Kovács, M. (2007). Nemi sztereotípiák, nemi ideológiák és karrier aspirációk [Gender Stereotypes, gender ideologies and career aspirations]. Educatio, 16(1), 99–114.
Ilonszki, G. (2014). “Jó kormányzás és a nemek egyenlősége. Magyarországi helyzetjelentés” [Good governance and gender equality. Report on Hungary]. In B. Juhász (Ed.), A nőtlen évek ára. A nők közpolitikai elemzése 1989–2013 [The price of the years without women. Analysis of female participation in public policies 1989–2013]. Budapest: Magyar Női Érdekérvényesítő Szövetség.
Nagy, B. (2012). Women in management—The Hungarian case. In C. Fagan, M. G. Menéndez, & S. G. Ansón (Eds.), Women on corporate boards and in top management: European trends and policy (pp. 221–244). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Book Series: Work and Welfare in Europe.
Nagy, B., & Vicsek, L. (2014). Exploring gender culture at a telecommunications company. Gender in management. An International Journal, 29(6), 318-333. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GM-01-2014-0008
Nagy, B., Király, G., & Géring, Z. (2016). Work-life balance and gender regime after the economic transition. Intersections. EEJSP, 2(3), 5–20. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v2i3.283
National Gender Strategy. (2010). Kormány 1004/2010. (I. 21.) Korm. határozata a Nők és Férfiak Társadalmi Egyenlőségét Elősegítő Nemzeti Stratégia—Irányok és Célok 2010–2021 [Government Decree 1004/2010 (I.21.) on National Strategy about the Social Equality between Women and Men—Directions and Targets 2010–2021], Magyar Közlöny MK 2010/5 6333 old.
Neményi, M., & Takács, J. (2016). Main breadwinner women in Hungary and their work-family balance related coping strategies. Intersections. EEJSP, 2(3), 97–117. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v2i3.170
Pongrácz, T., & S. Molnár, E. (2011). Nemi szerepek és a közvélemény változásának kölcsönhatása [Interaction of gender roles and changing public opinion]. In I. Nagy, T. Pongrácz & I. Gy.Tóth (Eds.), Szerepváltozások: Jelentés a nők és férfiak helyzetéről [Changing Roles: Report on the Situation of Women and Men] (pp. 192–206). Budapest: TÁRKI.
Szelényi, I. (1995). “Menedzser-kapitalizmus: a gazdasági intézményrendszer s a társadalmi struktúra változásai a poszt-kommunista átalakulás során” [Manager capitalism: changes of economic and social structure during the post-communist transformation]. Lettre International, 19(Winter), 21–29.
Tóth, H. (2005). Gendered dilemmas of the work-life balance in Hungary. Women in Management Review, 20(5), 361–375. doi:10.1108/09649420510609195
WEF. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagy, B., Primecz, H., Munkácsi, P. (2017). The Downturn of Gender Diversity on Boards in Hungary. In: Seierstad, C., Gabaldon, P., Mensi-Klarbach, H. (eds) Gender Diversity in the Boardroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57273-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57273-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57272-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57273-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)