Skip to main content

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: The Multiple Versions of Quota Laws in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss and make sense of similarities and differences with regard to the quota laws adopted within the eight countries discussed in this volume: Norway, Spain, Iceland, France, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. They all have, to date, introduced quota laws which are in many debates perceived as a unique tool to increase gender diversity on boards. What is evident is that a wide range of enabling/hindering forces, including the corporate governance structures, traditions, actors and history of equality initiatives, have led to significant variations in terms of approaches taken to increase the share of women on boards in the respective countries. It is also important to take these forces into consideration when making sense of the content, scope and acceptance of respective national quota laws.

In this chapter, we provide a holistic and comparative analysis of similarities and differences within the eight countries and, by doing so, aim to provide a better understanding of the introduction of different quota laws within the eight countries discussed. We argue that not only the different enabling/hindering forces, the historical development and the overall gender equality discourse, but also the corporate governance system influenced the specific country’s quota law design. This chapter also presents the key findings, and lessons learned, from this edited volume and indicates important areas for further research.

Since finalising this book: On 23 June 2017, Portugal approved the government proposal submitted in February with gender representation regulations (quotas) for both state-owned and listed companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R., Folatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementaries. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcot, S., Bruno, V., & Faure-Grimaud, A. (2010). Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working? International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (n.d.). Legislative board diversity. Retrieved March 13, 2017, from http://www.catalyst.org/legislative-board-diversity

  • Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate governance codes: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 222–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRC (The Financial Reporting Council). (2014). The UK Corporate Governance Code. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-2014.pdf

  • Krook, M. L. (2007). Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 4(3), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machold, S., Huse, M., Hansen, K., & Brogi, M. (2013). Getting women on to corporate boards. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schiehll, E., & Castro Martins, H. (2016). Cross-national governance research: A systematic review and assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2017). Women on boards: Beyond the institutional setting—The role of stakeholders and actors. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabaldon, P., Mensi-Klarbach, H., Seierstad, C. (2017). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: The Multiple Versions of Quota Laws in Europe. In: Seierstad, C., Gabaldon, P., Mensi-Klarbach, H. (eds) Gender Diversity in the Boardroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56142-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics