Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot Assisted Partial Pancreatectomy and Duodenopancreatectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Upper Abdominal Cancer

  • 836 Accesses

Abstract

Laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery, by showing that many abdominal operations can be performed safely and effectively despite minimally invasive access. Patients’ demand for minimally invasive surgery, on one hand, and surgeons’ motivation to pursue innovation and accept challenge, on the other, did the rest making laparoscopy an essential component of modern surgery. Laparoscopy, however, has intrinsic limitations, that are not completely overcome by expertise. These limitations have made the outcome of laparoscopy highly operator dependent [2], and have restricted the range of complex operations that can be safely performed using this technique [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bonrath EM, Zevin B, Dedy NJ, Grantcharov TP. Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1080–8. doi:10.1002/bjs.9168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F. Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:917–25. doi:10.1002/bjs.9135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stark M, Pomati S, D’Ambrosio A, Giraudi F, Gidaro S. A new telesurgical platform – preliminary clinical results. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:31–6. doi:10.3109/13645706.2014.1003945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos CO. 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:396–406. doi:10.1002/rcs.1468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:598–606. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boggi U, Napoli N, Costa F, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Vistoli F, Amorese G. Robotic-assisted pancreatic resections. World J Surg. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3565-3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Langø T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:253–88. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, Miccoli M, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updat Surg. 2015;67:257–64. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0299-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M, Miccoli M, Costa F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2016;33:299–307. doi:10.1159/000445015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:416–22. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Perrone VG, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Updat Surg. 2016;68(3):295–305. doi:10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Campani D, Pollina LE, Funel N, Cappelli C, Caramella D, Boggi U. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2016;401(8):1111–22. doi:10.1007/s00423-016-1499-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boggi U, Amorese G, De Lio N, Perrone V, D’Imporzano S, Croce C, Vistoli F, Signori S, Cappelli C, Mosca F. Central pancreatectomy with inframesocolic pancreatojejunostomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2012;397:1013–21. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0895-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boggi U, Palladino S, Massimetti G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Amorese G, Mosca F. Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1425–32. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Javed AA, Bagante F, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Makary MA, Hirose K, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Fishman EK. Postoperative omental infarct after distal pancreatectomy: appearance, etiology management, and review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:2028–37. doi:10.1007/s11605-015-2920-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Büchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernández-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:591–600. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright GP, Zureikat H. Development of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an evidence-based systematic review of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1658–65. doi:10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:9–23. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou JY, Xin C, Mou YP, Xu XW, Zhang MZ, Zhou YC, Lu C, Chen RG. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Zhao GD, Zhang X, Xu Y. The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5238-6.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1646–57. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0825-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas. 2010;39:160–4. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bd604e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:131–7. doi:10.1002/rcs.380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2397–402. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2207-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy – a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10:475–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhan Q, Deng XX, Han B, Liu Q, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW. Robotic-assisted pancreatic resection: a report of 47 cases. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:44–51. doi:10.1002/rcs.1475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh 3rd HJ. 250 Robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:682–9. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2410-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen S, Chen JZ, Zhan Q, Deng XX, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3698–711. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4140-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Ugo Boggi & Carlo Lombardo

Authors
  1. Ugo Boggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlo Lombardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Boggi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Miguel A. Cuesta

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Robot assisted duodenopancreatectomy (MP4 150526 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boggi, U., Lombardo, C. (2017). Robot Assisted Partial Pancreatectomy and Duodenopancreatectomy. In: Cuesta, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery for Upper Abdominal Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54301-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54300-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54301-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation