Skip to main content

Conflict of Interest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Getting to Good

Abstract

Conflict of interest (COI) describes a situation in which the impartiality of research may be compromised by the researcher standing to profit in some way from conclusions drawn in the research. This can be a conflict among roles as when a researcher takes on too many outside consulting duties and neglects mentoring students, or misses classroom teaching, or a conflict of trust when the ability to make money from offering a particular interpretation of findings distorts trust in the analysis or conclusions reached. COI can occur at individual, institutional, or industry level or in a particular case, at several of these levels at once. Conflicts can arise from financial, ideological, political, religious beliefs, or personal relationships. Transparency through the disclosure of financial COIs has been the main management technique for handling COI. But it is suboptimal because it provides no way to know for sure whether competing interests have compromised the research (Dunn et al. 2016). There is no detailed federal policy in the USA on identifying or managing institutional conflicts of interest. A survey by Resnik (2016) found that only 38% of top grant getting institutions had such policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Campbell E, Bogeli C, Rao S, Abraham M, Pierson R, Applebaum S. Industry relationships among academic institutional review board members; changes from 2005 through 2014. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn A, Colera E, Mandl K, Bourgeois F. Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott C. Institutional pathology and the death of Dan Markingson. Account Res. 2016. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns C, Glantz S, Schmidt L. Sugar industry influence on the scientific agenda of the National Institute of Dental Research’s 1971 National Caries Program: a historical analysis of internal documents. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik D. Institutional conflicts of interest policies at U.S. academic research institutions. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):242–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J. Lessons learned from the gene therapy trial for ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96:151–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Additional Suggested Reading

  • Dunn A, Colera E, Mandl K, Bourgeois F. Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:1. (A public registry of competing interests is needed in order to have a comprehensive view of COI.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott C. Institutional pathology and the death of Dan Markingson. Account Res. 2016. Epub ahead of print. (Apparent institutional regulatory oversight failure by a major public university is described. 2017 24(2):65–79)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik D. Institutional conflicts of interest policies at U.S. academic research institutions. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):242–246. (Policy development for institutional conflicts of interest are incomplete.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagawa H. Current regulatory systems for clinical trials in Japan: Still room for improvement. Clin Res Regul Aff. 2014;31(2–4):23–28. (Describes how a country develops its research regulatory system including management of COI.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara K. Redman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caplan, A.L., Redman, B.K. (2018). Conflict of Interest. In: Caplan, A., Redman, B. (eds) Getting to Good. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51358-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51357-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51358-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics