Skip to main content

Digital Implant Abutment and Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implant Aesthetics

Abstract

The use of digital technology has revolutionized implant dentistry by enhancing diagnostics, streamlining treatment planning, increasing the accuracy of implant placement and optimizing the design of abutments and crowns. This chapter describes the digital workflow in terms of the following aspects: (1) digital impression, (2) digital implant treatment planning and (3) digital abutment and crown design and manufacturing. Advances in digital technology are also discussed including (1) current range of materials available for implant abutment fabrication using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and (2) CAD/CAM provisional crown at the time of implant placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z (2009) Zirconia implant abutment fracture: clinical case reports and precautions for use. Int J Prosthodont 22(6):616–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD (2006) Marginal adaptation of cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 15(3):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Oden A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR (1998) Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 29(5):285–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204(9):505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P (2013) Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 25(3):159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein MM, Al-Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A (2014) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(Suppl):78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudrias P, Shoghikian E, Morin E, Hutnik P (2001) Esthetic option for the implant-supported single-tooth restoration – treatment sequence with a ceramic abutment. J Can Dent Assoc 67(9):508–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brawek P, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17:2119–2125 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G (2011) Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(6):631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canullo L (2007) Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Int J Prosthodont 20(5):489–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho MA, Sotto-Maior BS, Del Bel Cury AA, Pessanha Henriques GE (2014) Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112:1096–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen GJ (2009) Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140(10):1301–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock MRWRJ (2011) Is the US army dental corps ready for the digital impression? USA Army Med Dep J 1:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • El Askary AS (2001) Multifaceted aspects of implant esthetics: the anterior maxilla. Implant Dent 10(3):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanning B (2011) CBCT – the justification process, audit and review of the recent literature. J Ir Dent Assoc 57(5):256–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P (2004) Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 17(3):285–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ (2012) Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon‘s experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol 38(4):311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds KF (2014) Intraoral digital impressions to enhance implant esthetics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35(3 Suppl):25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong-Seoka P, Chintala S (2015) Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner. Proc Eng 100:1174–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang YC, Park YS, Kim HK, Hong YS, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ (2013) The evaluation of working casts prepared from digital impressions. Oper Dent 38:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ (2010) Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 38(5):323–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karunagaran S, Markose S, Paprocki G, Wicks R (2014) A systematic approach to definitive planning and designing single and multiple unit implant abutments. J Prosthodont 23:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J (2000) Utilizing computer generated titanium permanent healing. Abutments to promote ideal gingival form and anatomic restorartions on implants. Comendium 21(10):793–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA (2013) In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. J Prosthet Dent 109(4):255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kois JC (2001) Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22(3):199–206 quiz 208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kois JC (2004) Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25(11):895–896 898, 900 passim; quiz 906–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Gallucci GO (2013) Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(1):111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY (2008) Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J 27(3):422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B (1999) Zirconia-TZP and alumina – advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 7(4):113–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelaris GA, Vlk SD (2014) Guided implant surgery with placement of a presurgical CAD/CAM patient-specific abutment and provisional in the esthetic zone. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35(7):494–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L (2007) An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 35(11):819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR (1998) Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80(4):394–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T et al (2005) Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Implant Dent 14(4):312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T et al (2006) Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent 15(2):113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki T, Hotta Y (2011) CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U (2010) Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 23(4):299–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C (2014) A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112(3):555–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orentlicher G, Goldsmith D, Abboud M (2012) Computer-guided planning and placement of dental implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 20(1):53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestipino V, Ingber A (1993a) Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I. J Esthet Dent 5(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestipino V, Ingber A (1993b) Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II. J Esthet Dent 5(2):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest G (2005) Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(9 Suppl 2):22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaly J, Hart DP, Brukilacchio TJ (2008) Three-channel camera systems with non-collinear apertures. USA. 7,372,642

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hammerle CH (2009) In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(5):850–858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17(7):1759–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah K, Holloway JA, Denry IL (2008) Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87(2):329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38(7):553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ (2001) Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26(4):367–374

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Noort R (2012) The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington P, Rubenstein J, Hatcher DC (2010) The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 141(Suppl 3):19S–24S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H (2000) Ceramic abutments – a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 20(1):81–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nesrine Z. Mostafa BDS, MSc Dip Pros, PhD, FRCD(C) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mostafa, N.Z., Wyatt, C., Ng, J.A. (2017). Digital Implant Abutment and Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone. In: Karateew, E. (eds) Implant Aesthetics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50706-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50706-4_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50704-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50706-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics