Skip to main content

A Duty-Based Approach for Nursing Ethics & Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Key Concepts and Issues in Nursing Ethics
  • 8126 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to present a duty-based approach to moral decision-making. A duty-based system of doing ethics is technically known as deontology. This chapter focuses mainly on Immanuel Kant’s duty-based ethics as it is the major theory within the deontological tradition. The chapter explains some of the main features of Kant’s moral philosophy and its key terms such as autonomy, dignity and respect for persons, which have become part of the parlance of nursing ethics and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consequentialism is a term that describes ethical theories that base the morality of actions on the type of consequences produced. See Chap. 3 of this book for an explanation of one of the most prominent forms of consequentialism, i.e. Utilitarianism.

  2. 2.

    Other forms of duty-based ethics include, for example, the Divine Command Theory and Rossian Ethics. The Divine Command approach would claim that actions are right or wrong because God commands that they are right or wrong and therefore we have a duty to perform (or not to perform) them. Rossian Ethics is explained on p. 25 of this chapter.

  3. 3.

    Chap. 7 of this book provides a more detailed analysis of autonomy.

  4. 4.

    The ‘Realm of Ends’ – often described as the ‘Kingdom of Ends’ – formulation of the categorical imperative refers to the social context of respecting persons as ‘ends’. Deigh (2010 p. 169) explains that this is “… a community of all rational agents governed by laws that they give to themselves collectively.”

  5. 5.

    The contradictions in maxims are often referred to as a contradiction in conception and a contradiction in willing. O’Neill (1989 p. 89) uses the terms “conceptual inconsistency” and “volitional inconsistency”.

  6. 6.

    See Chap. 4 for an explanation of Virtue Ethics.

  7. 7.

    This is another form of deontology, sometimes known as Rossian, which deals with the problem of conflicting duties.

References

  • Altman MC (2014) Kant and applied ethics: the uses and limits of Kant’s practical philosophy. Wiley Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Birondo N (2007) Kantian reasons for reasons. Ratio 20(3):264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie NE (2002) A Kantian approach to business ethics. In: Frederick RE (ed) A companion to business ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Deigh J (2010) An introduction to ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson K (2014) An introduction to ethics. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert G (1999) Immanuel Kant: On treating persons as persons. Personalist Forum 15(2):247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker-Kenny M (2013) Recognising traditions of argumentation in philosophical ethics. In: Russell C, Hogan L, Junker-Kenny M (eds) Ethics for graduate researchers: a cross-disciplinary approach. Elsevier, London, pp 7–26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Wood AW (ed and trans). Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard C (1986) Kant's formula of humanity. Kant Studien, 77 (1-4): 183-202

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald LC (1978) Three forms of political ethics. West Polit Q 31(1):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (2008) Kant’s formula of humanity. Mind 117(465):85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland (NMBI) (2014) Code of professional conduct and ethics for registered nurses and registered midwives. http://www.nmbi.ie/Standards-Guidance/Code. Accessed 20 May 2016

  • O’Connor JD (2006) Are virtue ethics and kantian ethics really so very different? New Blackfriars 87(1009):238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (1989) Constructions of reason: explorations of Kant’s practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O (2014) A simplified account of Kant’s ethics. In: Cahn SM (ed) Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 110-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross WD (2002) The right and the good. Stratton-Lake P (ed) Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasso L, Stievano A, González Jurado M, Rocco G (2008) Code of ethics and conduct for European nursing. Nurs Ethics 15(6):821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Jerusalem Bible (1974) Jones A (ed) Darton, Longman & Todd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons M (2013) Moral theory: an Introduction, 2nd edn. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan J. Kearns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kearns, A.J. (2017). A Duty-Based Approach for Nursing Ethics & Practice. In: Scott, P. (eds) Key Concepts and Issues in Nursing Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49250-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49250-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49249-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49250-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics