Skip to main content

Commandment 3

Reflective: Organisations Reinvent Themselves

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication Excellence

Abstract

Excellent organisations are more open to influences from wider environments than non-excellent organisations. It is precisely this openness that gives them a competitive, strategic advantage. This holds not only for companies, but also for governmental and non-governmental organisations. Survival and success are functions of adaptation, and excellent organisations expose themselves to as many challenges as early as possible, because problematic situations enable and force them to learn. They use insights about shifts in public opinion, megatrends and demands from stakeholders to identify opportunities for growth. Constantly scrutinising and reinventing the organisational profile, policies, products and services is a necessity in today’s hypermodern world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Peters and Waterman (1982).

  2. 2.

    Sennett (2008).

  3. 3.

    Holmström (2004, 2009).

  4. 4.

    Van Ruler and Verčič (2005), p. 263.

  5. 5.

    Zerfass (2014), pp. 28–32.

  6. 6.

    Zerfass et al. (2015), p. 116. n = 1,600 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: How do you and your department help to reach the overall goals of your organisation? Scale 1 (rarely) – 5 (very often). Mean values. ** Highly significant differences (Pearson correlation, p ≤ 0.01). * Significant differences (Pearson correlation, p ≤ 0.05).

  7. 7.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 124. nmin = 1,066 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: When you coach, advise or enable executives/senior managers or other members of your organisation/client, how often do you practice the following activities? Scale 1 (not at all) – 5 (very often). **Highly significant differences (Pearson correlation, p ≤ 0.01).

  8. 8.

    Zerfass et al. (2015), p. 117. n = 1,601 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: How do you usually argue for the relevance of strategic communication when addressing top executives and (internal) clients? Scale 1 (never) – 5 (always). Mean values. **Highly significant differences for all items (Pearson correlation, p ≤ 0.01).

  9. 9.

    See for example McPhee and Zaug (2000); Taylor and Van Every (2000).

  10. 10.

    Zerfass et al. (2016), p. 125. nmin = 1,431 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: Thinking of yourself, your current capabilities and your future development, which of the following skills and knowledge areas do you believe are in need of developing? My organisation offers/facilitates training. *Significant differences (chi‐square test, p ≤ 0.05). **Highly significant differences (chi‐square test, p ≤ 0.01).

  11. 11.

    Zerfass et al. (2014), p. 144. n = 2,090 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: How many hours do you work in an average week, compared to the hours required by your work contract (with or without financial compensation)? Highly significant correlations for all items (Kendall rank correlation, p ≤ 0.01, τ = −0.121).

  12. 12.

    Zerfass et al. (2014), p. 145. n = 2,090 communication professionals working in communication departments across Europe. Q: How do you feel about your actual job situation? Scale 1 (strongly disagree) – 5 (totally agree). Mean values. **Highly significant differences (Kendall rank correlation, p ≤ 0.01).

References

  • Holmström, S. (2004). The reflective paradigm. In B. Van Ruler & D. Verčič (Eds.), Public Relations in Europe, a Nation-by-Nation Introduction of Public Relations Theory (pp. 121–134). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, S. (2009). On Luhmann. In Ø. Ihlen, B. Van Ruler, & M. Fredriksson (Eds.), Public Relations and Social Theory. Key Figures and Concepts (pp. 187–211). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organisations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/010/1/01017.html

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The Emergent Organisation: Communication as its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (2005). Reflective communication management: Future ways for public relations research. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 29 (pp. 239–273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A. (2014). Unternehmensführung und Kommunikationsmanagement: Strategie, Management und Controlling. In A. Zerfass & M. Piwinger (Eds.), Handbuch Unternehmenskommunikation (2nd ed.) (pp. 21–79). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Tench, R., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., & Moreno, A. (2014). European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., & Tench, R. (2015). European Communication Monitor 2015. Creating Communication Value Through Listening, Messaging and Measurement. Results of a Survey in 41 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Helios Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., Verhoeven, P., Moreno, A., Tench, R., & Verčič, D. (2016). European Communication Monitor 2016. Exploring Trends In Big Data, Stakeholder Engagement and Strategic Communication Results of a Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: EACD/EUPRERA, Quadriga Media Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tench, R., Verčič, D., Zerfass, A., Moreno, Á., Verhoeven, P. (2017). Commandment 3. In: Communication Excellence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48860-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics