Skip to main content

Canaloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 692 Accesses

Abstract

First successful antiglaucomatous surgery was performed by the German ophthalmologist Albrecht von Graefe in 1852. The described technique did work only in acute angle closure glaucoma. In the following 100 years various surgical techniques addressed open angle glaucoma problematic. Since early 1970th trabeculectomy became the standard of care in open-angle glaucoma surgery. This widely used procedure involves a surgically formed pathway for aqueous humour between the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in treatment of glaucoma. Main goal is the formation of a conjunctival filtering bleb. This is a relatively unphysiological approach and scleral as well as conjunctival scarring led to introduction of antimetabolites as adjunctive for filtering bleb depending glaucoma surgeries. Numerous intraoperative and postoperative complications have been cited [1–5]. These include hypotony, maculopathy, blebitis/endophthlamitis, hyphema, suprachoroidal hemorrhage or effusions, encapsulation of the bleb with resultant IOP elevation, loss of visual acuity, and increased risk for cataract formation. In addition, intensive postoperative care, including bleb massage, laser suturolysis, release of releasable sutures, needling, or 5-fluorouracil injections, may be needed to achieve primary success. Recently several authors reported relatively high failure rate of trabeculectomy after long term follow-up [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jones E, Clarke J, Khaw PT. Recent advances in trabeculectomy technique. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mac I, Soltau JB. Glaucoma-filtering bleb infections. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:91–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borisuth NSC, Phillips B, Krupin T. The risk of glaucoma filtration surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10:112–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ophir A. Encapsulated filtering bleb; a selective review –new deductions. Eye. 1992;6:348–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, et al. Surgical complications in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellingsen BA, Grant WM. Trabeculotomy and sinusotomy in enucleated human eyes. Investig Ophthalmol. 1972;11:21–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnstone MA, Grant WM. Microsurgery of Schlemm’s canal and the human aqueous outflow systeme. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;76:906–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein E. Fibrosing response to aqueous; its relation to glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1959;43:641–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Krasnov MM. Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1968;52:157–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koslov VI, Bagrov SN, Anisimova SY, et al. (Nonpentrating deep sclerectomy with collagen) Russian. Oftalmokhirurgiia. 1990;3:44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fyodorov SN, Ioffe DI, Ronkina TI. Deep sclerectomy: technique and mechanism of a new antiglaucomatous procedure. Glaucoma. 1984;6:281–183.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, et al. Trabeculectomy vs. nonpenetrating trabeculectomy: a retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1984;15:734–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stegmann R, Pinenaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:316–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sourdille P, Santiago P-Y, Villain F, et al. Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in nonperforating trabecular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:332–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:214–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, et al. Deep sclerectomy: results with and without collagen implant. Int Ophthalmol. 1996/97;20:157–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wiermann A, Zeitz O, Jochim E, Matthiessen ET, Wagenfeld L, Galambos P, Scharioth G, Matthiesen N, Klemm M. A comparision between absorbable and non-absorbable scleral implants in deep sclerectomy (T-Flux and SK-Gel. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104(5):409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schreyger F, Scharioth GB, Baatz H. SKGEL implant versus T-Flux implant in the contralateral eye in deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification: long-term follow-up. Open Ophthalmol J. 2008;2:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Bart DPS, Shiew M, Edmunds B. A randomized, prospective study comparing trabeculectomy with viscocanalostomy with adjunctive antimetabolite usage for the management of open angle glaucoma uncontrolled by medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1012–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U. Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma; three years prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2050–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanaolostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma; a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:882–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kobayashi H, Kobayashi K, Okinami S. A comparision of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of viscocanalostomy and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in bilateral open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:359–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Lodato G. Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy: effect of low dose mitomycin C. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, et al. A prospective ranndomized trial of viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma: a 1-year follow-up study. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldsmith JA, Ahmed IK, Cradall AS. Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2005;18(3):443–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith R. A new technique for opening the canal of Schlemm. Br J Ophthalmol. 1960;44:370–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck AD, Lynch MG. 360° trabeculotomy for primary congenital glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1200–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scharioth GB. Cartheterless Viscocanaloplasty, 6th Congress of Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2007, Sinaia, Romania. and 3rd International Meeting on Innovative Glaucoma Surgery, Recklinghausen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: Two-year interim clinical study results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:814–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grieshaber MC. Channelography and mechanism of action in canaloplasty. Ophthalmologe. 2015;112(4):319–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Scharioth GB. Glaucolight assisted Canaloplasty. Highlights Ophthalmol. 2012;40(6):2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scharioth GB. Risk of circumferential viscodilatation in viscocanalostomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):1122–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rękas M, Petz K, Wierzbowska J, Byszewska A, Jünemann A. Evacuating a pre-Descemet hematoma through a clear corneal incision during acanaloplasty procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(12):1953–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Canaloplasty (MPG 104696 kb)

Canaloplasty with Onalene (MPG 177941 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scharioth, G.B. (2017). Canaloplasty. In: Spandau, U., Scharioth, G. (eds) Cutting Edge of Ophthalmic Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47226-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47226-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47225-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47226-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics