Skip to main content

Syntaxonomic Overview of the Vascular Plant Communities of Central Europe: Forest and Scrub Formations

Compiled by H. Dierschke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecology of Central European Forests

Abstract

The following overview uses, where possible, the names of the higher level vegetation units of the Central Europe vascular flora that are most widely recognised. The syntaxonomic treatment primarily follows the system proposed by Rennwald (2000) for Germany which bases on major phytosociological works of Oberdorfer et al. (1987–1992), Pott (1995), Dierschke (1996 et seqq.) and others. Additional information was taken from synsystematic surveys compiled for Austria (Mucina et al. 1993; Willner and Grabherr 2007) and the Czech Republic (Chytrý 2007 et seqq.), as well as in some cases specific studies that are cited in the text. Here, the names of the authors of the syntaxa will be given (= the first scientifically valid description following the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature, ICPN; Weber et al. 2001). These names were not checked as part of this book, but follow e.g. Berg et al. (2004). The English names of the vegetation classes were in most cases aligned with those used by Rodwell et al. (2002) in an overview of European vegetation units, though often in a shortened version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 13 April 2018

    Unfortunately, in the original version of these chapters the below listed corrections & figures were not updated. The corrected versions are given on the following pages:

References

  • Berg, C., Dengler, J., Abdank, A., Isermann, M. (eds.) 2004. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung. Textband. Landesamt f. Umwelt, Natursch. Geol. Meckl.-Vorpomm. Weissdorn-Verlag, Jena. 606 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý, M. (ed.) (2007). Vegetation of the Czech Republic. 1. Grassland and Heathland Vegetation. Academia, Praha. 526 p. (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, G., 1958. Die eibenreichen Waldgesellschaften Mitteldeutschlands. Arch. Forstwes. 7: 502–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matuszkiewicz, W., 1962. Zur Systematik der natürlichen Kiefernwälder des mittel- und osteuropäischen Flachlandes. Mitt. Florist.-Sozio. Arb.gem. N.F. 9: 145–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, M., 1958. Pflanzengesellschaften schweizerischer Flußauen. Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Forstl. Versuchswes. 34: 221–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, M., 1975a. Die soziologisch-systematische Gliederung des Hirschzungen-Ahornwaldes. Beitr. Naturk. Forsch. Südwestd. 34: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, M., 1975b. Der Ulmen-Ahornwald (Ulmo-Aceretum Issler 1926). Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 85: 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, M., 1975c: Ahornwälder im Jura und in den Alpen. Phytocoenologia 2: 244–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina, L., Grabherr, G., Ellmauer, T., (eds.), 1993. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Österreichs. 3 Bde. Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, T., 1966. Vegetationskundliche Beobachtungen im Naturschutzgebiet Hohentwiel. Veröff. Landesstelle Natursch. u. Landschaftspfl. Bad.-Württemb. 34: 14–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarge, H., Hofmann, G., 1968. Zur soziologischen Gliederung nord-mitteleuropäischer Hainbuchenwälder. Feddes Repert. 78: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott, R., 1995. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. 2. ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart. 622 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennwald, E. (Bearb.), 2000. Verzeichnis und Rote Liste der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Schriftenr. Vegetationsk. 35: 1–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J.S., Schaminée, J.H.J., Mucina, L., Pignatti, S., Dring, J., Moss, D. 2002. The diversity of European vegetation: An overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats. Nat. Ref. Centre Agric., Nat. Fish., Wageningen, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, H.E. 1997. Hecken und Gebüsche in den Kulturlandschaften Europas. Pflanzensoziologische Dokumentation als Basis für Schutzmaßnahmen. Ber. Reinh.-Tüxen-Ges. 9: 75-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, H.E., 1999. Rhamno-Prunetea. Schlehen- und Traubenholunder-Gebüsche. Synopsis der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands (H1). Selbstverlag Florist.-Soziol. Arb.gem., Göttingen. 108 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, H.E., Moravec, J., Theurillat, J.P. 2001. Internationaler Code der Pflanzensoziologischen Nomenklatur (ICPN). Synopsis der Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands, Beiheft 1: 1-61. Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner, W., Grabherr, G., 2007. Die Wälder und Gebüsche Österreichs. 1 Textband. Elsevier, Heidelberg. 322 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leuschner, C., Ellenberg, H. (2017). Syntaxonomic Overview of the Vascular Plant Communities of Central Europe: Forest and Scrub Formations. In: Ecology of Central European Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43042-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics