Skip to main content

Ethics and the ICU

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Adult Surgical Critical Care
  • 2177 Accesses

Abstract

Ethical issues in the ICU seem to be growing with the increasing complexity of medical treatments. Despite many bioethicists, clinicians, academicians, and others attempting to resolve these conflicts, we don’t seem to be any closer to solutions. This chapter will review several key principles and ethical situations in the ICU including withdrawing and withholding, DNR, futility, advance directives and POLST, artificial nutrition and hydration, dialysis, and organ donation. This chapter will also discuss the differences between resources available to help resolve these conflicts: ethics consults, palliative medicine, and conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2nd ed. Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. Chicago, IL; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslakson RA, Curtis JR, Nelson JE. The changing role of palliative care in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(11):2418–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman EJ. Surmounting elusive barriers: the case for bioethics mediation. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24(1):11–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop JP, Brothers KB, Perry JE, Ahmad A. Reviving the conversation around CPR/DNR. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, Curtis JR, Ford DW, Osborne M, Misak C, Au DH, Azoulay E, Brody B, Fahy BG, Hall JB, Kesecioglu J, Kon AA, Lindell KO, White DB. American thoracic society ad hoc committee on futile and potentially inappropriate treatment. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brett AS, McCullough LB. Addressing requests by patients for nonbeneficial interventions. JAMA. 2012;307(2):149–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feudtner C, Morrison W. The darkening veil of “do everything”. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(8):694–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Germain MJ, Davison SN, Moss AH. When enough is enough: the nephrologist’s responsibility in ordering dialysis treatments. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(1):135–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halevy A. Medical futility, patient autonomy, and professional integrity: finding the appropriate balance. Health Matrix Cleve. 2008;18(2):261–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C, Campbell M, Lustbader DR, Mosenthal AC, Puntillo K, Ray DE, Bassett R, Boss RD, Brasel KJ, Frontera JA, Hays RM, Weissman DE. Improving palliative care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) project advisory board. Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the ICU: a report from the improving palliative care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) advisory board. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2318–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neuman MD, Allen S, Schwarze ML, Uy J. Using time-limited trials to improve surgical care for frail older adults. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):639–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reuben DB, Tinetti ME. The hospital-dependent patient. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):694–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Venneman SS, Narnor-Harris P, Perish M, Hamilton M. “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(1):2–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeiler K, Furberg E, Tufveson G, Welin S. The ethics of non-heart-beating donation: how new technology can change the ethical landscape. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(7):526–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine C. Toevs MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toevs, C.C. (2016). Ethics and the ICU. In: Martin, N.D., Kaplan, L.J. (eds) Principles of Adult Surgical Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33341-0_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33341-0_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33339-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33341-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics