Skip to main content

Reading Format Preferences of Finnish University Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability (ECIL 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 552))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The reading format preferences of Finnish university students were studied as part of an international research project. The research material was compiled by a web based questionnaire sent to 18 universities in Finland and over 600 completed questionnaires were received. Printed class readings were preferred by a clear majority of informants, especially if the texts are long. However, only less than half of the informants would want all course materials in print format, often due to ecological reasons. Moreover, electronic publications are easy to store on a computer, and there is also a minority preferring electronic format, especially among students of technology. In most cases also informants with visual limitation preferred printed format to electronic, suggesting to the need for further develop the latter group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Woody, W.D., Daniel, D.B., Baker, C.A.: E-books or textbooks: students prefer textbooks. Comput. Educ. 55, 945–948 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, M., Chen, S.: Graduate students’ usage of and attitudes towards e-books: experiences from Taiwan. Prog.: Electron. Libr. Inf. Syst. 45(3), 294–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robb, A.: 92 Percent of College Students Prefer Reading Print Books to E-Readers. New Republic (2015). http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120765/naomi-barons-words-onscreen-fate-reading-digital-world

  4. The Finelib Consortium. The national library of Finland. http://www.nationallibrary.fi/libraries/finelib/

  5. Taipale, S.: The affordances of reading/writing on paper and digitally in Finland. Telematics Inform. 31(4), 532–542 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kortelainen, T.: An analysis of the use of electronic journals and commercial journal article collections through the FinELib portal. Inf. Res. 9(2), paper 168 (2004). http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper168.html

  7. Impact and Evaluation. FinELib. The national electronic library. The national library of Finland. http://www.nationallibrary.fi/libraries/finelib/imapctandevaluation.html

  8. Mizrachi, D.: Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. J. Acad. Librarianship 41(3), 301–311 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loan, A.F.: Media preferences of the net generation college students. Int. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 3(7), 155–161 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tan, T.: College students still prefer print textbooks. publisher weekly (2014). http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/content-and-e-books/article/63225-college-students-prefer-a-mix-of-print-and-digital-textbooks.html

  11. Lincoln, T.D.: Reading and e-reading for academic work: patterns and preferences in theological studies and religion. Theological Librarianship 6(2), 34–52 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., Bronnick, K.: Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: effects on reading comprehension. Int. J. Educ. Res. 58, 61–68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rainie, L., Zickuhr, K., Purcell, K., Madden, M., Brenner, J.: The Rise of E-reading. PewInternet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2012). http://libraries.pewinternet.org/files/legacy-pdf/The%20rise%20of%20e-reading%204.5.12.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kang, Y.-Y., Wang, M.J., Rungtai, L.: Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays 30, 49–52 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartell, L.J., Cheek, F.M.: Preferred book formats in an academic medical center. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 99(4), 313–317 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evett, L., Brown, D.: Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers – clear text for all. Interact. Comput. 17(4), 453–472 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Creaser, C., Spacey, R., Hicks, D.: Assessing the Impact of Reading for Blind and Partially Sighted Adults. Report to RNIB. The Reading Agency, Loughborough University (2012). http://readingagency.org.uk/news/RNIB%20-%20Impact%20of%20reading%20report.pdf

  18. Statistics Finland. Published 23.4.2013. http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/yop/2012/01/yop_2012_01_2013-04_23_tie_001_fi.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Professor Serap Kurbanoglu from Hacettepe University Department of Information Management and Associate Professor Joumana Boustany from Paris Descartes University Information and Communication Department for their initiation of and support for the international research project of which this study is part, and all partners of the research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terttu Kortelainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kortelainen, T. (2015). Reading Format Preferences of Finnish University Students. In: Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds) Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability. ECIL 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 552. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28196-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28197-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics