Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Food Products Evolution: Innovation Drivers and Market Trends pp 23–39Cite as

Innovation in the Food Industry: A Comparison Between New and Traditional Categories of Foodstuffs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition ((BRIEFSFOOD))

Abstract

According to a recent Accenture survey, “Stepping off the crazy train” (2017), a total of 80% of companies still use an outdated approach to innovation, based on incremental tweaking (Holman et al., 2017). The empirical analysis showed that, in the Italian food sector, innovation adoption follows different patterns when product or process innovation is considered. On the other hand, Capitanio et al. (Br Food J 111(8):820–838, 2009) show how the probability of introducing product innovation is influenced by the quality of human capital, the geographical context and, to a lesser extent, the company age. The more a sector is characterized by the presence of small or medium enterprises (SMEs), and so by a poor internal availability of qualified competences and capitals to invest, the more the innovation comes from outside. Indeed, SMEs are not normally able to generate innovations and are therefore willing to adopt them by borrowing from other sectors, which might present different characteristics. Consequently, these innovations often have to be readjusted, as they have been conceived for different scopes and applications at the moment of their development. Thanks to the economic growth in Italy, companies such as Ferrero, Barilla and Parmalat have established themselves as major business centres in the development of innovation, and were capable of driving the entire context characterized by the presence of SMEs. Cooperation is particularly important for innovation in the food industry, which is traditionally considered a “low technology” sector (Trott and Simms 2017). Nowadays, the food industry is facing technical and economic changes of society, manufacture and food processing that affect the whole supply-chain. This fact forced companies to pay great attention in food products, in order to meet the consumer’s demand for a healthier lifestyle. As a consequence, innovation in the food industry does not only appear as an opportunity, but also as a prerequisite to stand out from the competition, apply specific pricing policies, penetrate new markets and ensure sustainability of the food sector (Galanakis, 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAFC - Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. (2015). Emerging food innovation: Trends and opportunities (http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/?id=1291045147723).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (2005). Innovation and technological change. In Z. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 55–80). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aharonson, B., Feldman, M. P., & Baum, J. A. (2007). Desperately seeking spillovers?: Increasing returns, industrial organization and the location of new entrants in geographic and technological space. SSRN Electronic Journal, 16, 89–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepeneurship through social networks. California Management Review, 33, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, W. J., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition. (2016). Doppia piramide 2016, Parma, Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, G., & Mariscotti, A. (1996). I nuovi orientamenti del consumatore e i riflessi sulle imprese agro-alimentari. Osservatorio agro-industriale per la Toscana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieberstein, A., Roosen, J., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., & Vandermoere, F. (2012). Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40, 73–94, advance access February.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. (2001). Self-organizing processes in building entrepreneurial networks: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Human Systems Management, 20, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigliardi, B., & Galati, F. (2012). Models of adoption of open innovation within the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.11.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bougheas, S. (2004). Internal vs external financing of R&D. Small Business Economics, 22(1), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31(5), 735–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratti, M., & Felice, G. (2012). Are exporters more likely to introduce product innovations? The World Economy, 35(11), 1559–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Food Innovators. (2017). Food and beverage research and innovation priority setting final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitanio, F., Coppola, A., & Pascucci, S. (2009). Indications for drivers of innovation in the food sector. British Food Journal, 111(8), 820–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry, Q., Scotter, M., Blackburn, J., Bryony, R., Boxall, A., Castle, L., et al. (2008). Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 25, 241–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chellaram, C., Murugaboopathib, G., Johna, A. A., Sivakumarc, R., Ganesand, S., Krithikae, S., & Priya, G. (2014). Significance of nanotechnology in food industry. APCBEE Procedia, 8(2014), 109–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, S., Bröring, S., & Martino, G. (2015). Drivers of innovation in the European food industry: Evidences from the community innovation survey. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 6(2), 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, S., Carraresi, L., & Bröring, S. (2016). Drivers of innovation in Italy: Food versus pharmaceutical industry. British Food Journal, 118(6), 1292–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of European Union. (2016). Smart guide to cluster policy. Internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs. Belgium, European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C., King, E. B., & Lane, N. (2006). What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology? Nature Nanotechnology, 1, 153–155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1991). Perspective on evolutionary theory. Science and Public Policy, 18(6), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drivas, K., & Giannakas, K. (2006). The effect of cooperatives on product innovation in the agri-food system. In American Agricultural Economic Association annual meeting proceedings, July 23–26, Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emamisaleh, K., & Rahmani, K. (2017). Sustainable supply chain in food industries: Drivers and strategic sustainability orientation. Cogent Business & Management, 4, 1345296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD & WFP. (2014). The state of food insecurity in the world. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • FoodDrink Europe. (2016). Data & Trends – EU food and drink industry. Brussels: FoodDrink Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freel, M. S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy, 32(5), 751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallocchio, F., Belluco, S., & Ricci, A. (2015). Nanotechnology and food: Brief overview of the current scenario. Procedia Food Science, 5(2015), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanakis, C. (2016). Innovation strategies in the food industry: Tools for implementation. Academic Press, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32(5), 715–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumezescu, A. M. (2016). Novel approaches of nanotechnology in food: Nanotechnology in the agri-food industry (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Academic Press, ISBN: 978-0-12-804308-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. A. (1992). Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network (VIC), ISBN 1 86335 049 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman R., Kohok A., & Lippautz S. (2017). Stepping off the crazy train, Accenture (https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-49/Accenture-PoV-Crazy-Train.pdf).

  • Ireland, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, J. P., O’Grady, M. N., & Hogan, S. A. (2006). Past, current and potential utilization of active and intelligent packaging systems for meat and muscle-based products: A review. Meat Science, 74(1), 113–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiriyama, N. (2012). Trade and innovation: Synthesis report, OECD trade policy papers 135. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (1998). Optimal scale for research and development in foreign environments: An investigation into size and performance of research and development laboratories abroad. Research Policy, 27(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Saqib, M. (1996). Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: The case of Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, 25(5), 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. Y., & Sung, T. (2005). Schumpeter’s legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D. Research Policy, 34(6), 914–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, M. (2017). L’innovazione sociale nel settore agricolo del Mezzogiorno. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorusso, S., & Mellano, M. (1993). La struttura dell’industria nelle principali aree ad economia di mercato. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (1999). The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organization, 15(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn, J., & Martin, S. (1986). Market structure, firm structure and research and development. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 26(1), 31–44.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martine, G., & Diniz Alves, J. E. (2015). Economía, sociedad y medio ambiente en el siglo 21: triple vertiente o trilema de la sostenibilidad? Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, ISSN 0102-3098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molero, J., & Buesa, M. (1996). Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: The case of Madrid region. Research Policy, 25(4), 647–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollet, B., & Rowland, I. (2002). Functional foods: At the frontier between food and pharma. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13(5), 483–485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mura, S., Seddaiu, G., Bacchini, F., Roggero, P. P., & Greppi, G. F. (2013). Advances of nanotechnology in agro-environmental studies. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 8, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017, February). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen and Yahoo. (2015). Discovering Millennials, 26 maggio 2015, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, K. (2006). Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development. Small States: Economic Review and Basic Statistics, 11, 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omanović-Mikličanin, E., Maksimovic, M., & Mulaomerović, D. (2016). Application of nanotechnologyin food packaging. Da sito internet: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308685470_Application_of_nanotechnology_in_food_packaging

  • Omta, O., Trienekens, J., & Beers, G. (2001). The knowledge domain of chain and network science. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 1(2), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plastic Europe. (2016). Plastics – The facts 2016. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. Brussels: Plastic Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and competition: New agendas for companies, governments, and institutions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapporto Coop. (2016). Consumi e distribuzione: Assetti, dinamiche, previsioni. Casalecchio di Reno: Coop Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redifining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1986). The role of small firms in technological innovation. In J. Curran, J. Stanworth, & D. Watkins (Eds.), The survival of the small firm (Vol. 2, pp. 114–139). London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H., & Nadvi, K. (1999). Clustering and industrialization: Introduction. World Development, 27, 1503–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatkin, J. A. (2013). Nanotechnology, health and environmental risks. London: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodano, V., & Quaglietta, M. (2014). Nanotecnologie e settore agroalimentare: applicazioni e quadro normativo, Agriregionieuropa, anno 10 n°36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 31(2), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessitore, S., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2013). The link between environmental and economic performance: Evidence from some eco-innovative industrial clusters. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 124–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricoltural sustainability and intensive production practises. Nature, 418, 671–677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traill, B., & Meulenberg, M. (2002). Innovation in the food industry. Agribusiness, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, Elsevier, 92(C), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2017). An examination of product innovation in low-and medium-technology industries: Cases from the UK packaged food sector. Research Policy, 46(3), 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015). World population projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future (p. 43). Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, O. E. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1988, July). Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 43, 567–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkokari, K., & Helander, N. (2007). Knowledge management in different types of strategic SME networks. Management Research News, 30, 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Angela Tarabella, Andrea Masoni, Leonello Trivelli & Andrea Apicella

  2. Department of Economics, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

    Mariarosaria Lombardi, Roberto Leonardo Rana & Caterina Tricase

Authors
  1. Angela Tarabella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Masoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonello Trivelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Apicella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mariarosaria Lombardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roberto Leonardo Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Caterina Tricase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Tarabella .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tarabella, A. et al. (2019). Innovation in the Food Industry: A Comparison Between New and Traditional Categories of Foodstuffs. In: Food Products Evolution: Innovation Drivers and Market Trends. SpringerBriefs in Food, Health, and Nutrition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23811-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation