Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robot Assisted Pyeloplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery

  • 1029 Accesses

Abstract

Aim: To review the global select data on the current technique, peri-operative outcome and follow up literature and to describe the operative technique of robot assisted pyeloplasty (RAP).

Methods: The published English literature (PubMed™) was searched at length using the key words; robot, robot assisted pyeloplasty, laparoscopy, laparoscopic pyeloplasty and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The selected studies were then reviewed, followed and scrutinized to determine the current role, outcome and status of robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Results: The search yielded about 30 published series on RAP comprising about 1110 cases with a mean operative time, estimated blood loss, crossing vessel prevalence, hospital stay,peri-operative complication rate and follow up duration of 189 min, 47 ml, 47%, 2.3 days, 6% and 18 months respectively.

Conclusion: The initial peri-operative results and intermediate follow up of cases of repair of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction with robot assisted pyeloplasty appear to be favorable and comparable to that of open pyeloplasty, with emerging good long term outcome follow up data also available. The da-Vinci® surgical robotic system is a promising surgical armamentarium in the hands of the modern day urologist for the minimally invasive definitive surgical management of both primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Schultheiss D, Rathert P, Becht E. History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present. Urologe A. 2004;43(12):1544–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Plastic operation for hydronephrosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1951;44(1):4–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wickham JE, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol. 1983;9(2):122–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Badlani G, Eshghi M, Smith AD. Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): technique and early results. J Urol. 1986;135(1):26–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Inglis JA, Tolley DA. Ureteroscopic pyelolysis for pelviureteric junction obstruction. Br J Urol. 1986;58(3):250–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McClinton S, Steyn JH, Hussey JK. Retrograde balloon dilatation for pelviureteric junction obstruction. Br J Urol. 1993;71(2):152–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandhoke PS, Clayman RV, Stone AM, McDougall EM, Buelna T, Hilal N, Chang M, Stegwell MJ. Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: preliminary experience. J Endourol. 1993;7(1):45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87:287–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1962–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology. 1999;53(6):1099–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology. 2001;58(6):893–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorincz A, Knight CG, Kant AJ, Langenburg SE, Rabah R, Gidell K, Dawe E, Klein MD, McLorie G. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist surgical system: an animal study. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(2):418–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150:1795–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150:1891–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Reissigl A. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 1994;8:S83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol. 2002;167:1253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ono AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int. 2005;95:102–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Frauscher F. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:695–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Li HZ, Ma X. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2006;176:1077–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan BJ, Rastinehad AR, Marcovich R, Smith AD, Lee BR. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2005;65:260–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemal AK, Goel R, Goel A. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: single center experience. Int J Urol. 2003;10(11):563–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hemal AK, Menon M. Robotics in urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):89–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques:initial clinical results. Eur Urol. 2002;42:453–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60(3):509–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Graham RW, Graham SD, Bokinsky GB, Monahan MB. Urological upper tract surgery with the daVinci robotic system, pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2001;165:V74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Cappele O, Navarre S, Martinez J, Vallancien G. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2001;165:V75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta NP, Mukherjee S, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Kumar R. Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty: single center experience. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):945–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaouk JH, Hafron J, Parekattil S, Moinzadeh A, Stein R, Gill IS, Hegarty N. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results. J Endourol. 2008;22(9):2153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meng MV, Stoller MI. Hellstrom technique revisited: laparoscopic management of UPJ obstruction. Urology. 2003;62(3):404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Badani KK, Hemal AK, Fumo M, Kaul S, Shrivastava A, Rajendram AK, Yusoff NA, Sundram M, Susan Woo S, Peabody JO, Mohamed SR, Menon M. Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol. 2006;24:198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee RS, Passerotti CC, Cendron M, Estrada CR, Borer JG, Peters CA. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol. 2007;177:2306–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Atug F, Castle EP, Burgess SV, Thomas R. Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteral junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery. BJU Int. 2005;96:1365–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Singh I, Khaitan A. Retroperitoneal ureterolysis and reconstruction of retrocaval ureter. J Endourol. 2001;15(3):291–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hemal AK, Rao R, Sharma S, Clement RG. Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(6):734–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jindal L, Gupta AK, Mumtaz F, Sunder R, Hemal AK. Laparoscopic nephroplication and nephropexy as an adjunct to pyeloplasty in UPJO with giant hydronephrosis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(3–4):443–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boylu U, Lee BR, Thomas R. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and nephropexy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and nephroptosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(3):379–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, McGinnis DE, Bagley DH. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol. 2008;180:1397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Murphy D, Challacombe B, Olsburgh J, Calder F, Mamode M, Khan MS, Mushtaq I, Dasgupta P. Ablative and reconstructive robotic-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1703–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD, Palese MA, Berger AD, Thomas R, Stifelman MD. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J Urol. 2008;180:1391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol. 2008;15(8):744–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Pesch R. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJUI. 2007;100:880–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178(5):2137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175(2):683–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Weise ES, Winfield HN. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2006;20:813–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;4067(3):599–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2237–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology. 2005;66:45–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, Sosa RE, Philipps CK, Dinlenc C, Del Pizzo JJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol. 2005;19:382–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Palese MA, Munver R, Phillips CK, Dinlenc C, Stifelman M, Delpizzo JJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. JSLS. 2005;9:252–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174(4 pt 1):1440–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Atug F, Burgess SV, Castle EK, Thomas R. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:9–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mendez-torres F, Woods M, Thomas R. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2005;19:393–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bernie JE, Ramakrishna V, Brown J, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP. Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without robotic assistance. JSLS. 2005;9:258–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Soulie M, Thoulouzan M, Seguin P, Mouly P, Vazzoler N, Pontonnier F, Plante P. Retroperitoneoscopic laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology. 2001;57:443–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty indications, technique, and long term outcome. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:323–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Singh I, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome. Can J Urol. 2010;17(2):5099–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rohrmann D, Snyder HM III, Duckett JW Jr, Canning DA, Zderic SA. The operative management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 1997;158:1257–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2003;169:2037–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winklemann B. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol. 2002;42:268–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chammas M Jr, Feuillu B, Coissard A, Hubert J. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelviureteric obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys:technique and 1-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2006;97:579–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Hemal AK. Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction. World J Urol. 2010;28(5):599–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Leveillee RJ, Williams SK. Role of robotics for ureteral pelvic junction obstruction and ureteral pathology. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19(1):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Peters CA. Robotic pyeloplasty-the new standard of care? J Urol. 2008;180(4):1223–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Braga LH, Pace K, Demaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):848–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Novara G. Editorial comment on: systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):857–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fornara P, Greco F. Editorial comment on: systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R, Dogra PN. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience. BJU Int. 2010;105(7):980–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Desai MM, Rao PP, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S, Kaouk JH, Gill IS. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int. 2008;101:83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Desai MM, Stein R, Rao P, Canes D, Aron M, Rao PP, Haber GP, Fergany A, Kaouk J, Gill IS. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for advanced reconstruction: initial experience. Urology. 2009;73(1):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, Haber GP, Goel RK, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH, Gill IS. Transumbilical single port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1020–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Freilich DA, Nguyen HT, Borer J, Nelson C, Passerotti CC. Concurrent management of bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children using robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Int Br J Urol. 2008;34(2):198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Singh K. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus robotic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a series of 60 cases performed by a single surgeon. Can J Urol. 2010;17(1):5012–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Shah HN, Nayyar R, Rajamahanty S, Hemal AK. Prospective evaluation of unidirectional barbed suture for various indications in surgeon-controlled robotic reconstructive urologic surgery: Wake Forest University experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(3):775–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hopf HL, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Long-term outcomes of robot- assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.050. pii: S0090-4295(16)00024-8. [Epub ahead of print]

  75. Ener K, Altınova S, Canda AE, Özcan MF, Asil E, Ürer E, Atmaca AF, Akbulut Z. Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty procedures: a series of 18 patients. Turk J Urol. 2014;40(4):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Avery DI, Herbst KW, Lendvay TS, Noh PH, Dangle P, Gundeti MS, Steele MC, Corbett ST, Peters CA, Kim C. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(3):139.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Traumann M, Kluth LA, Schmid M, Meyer C, Schwaiger B, Rosenbaum C, Schriefer P, Fisch M, Dahlem R, Seiler D, Ahyai S, Haese A, Chun FK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: excellent long-term results of primary pyeloplasty. Urologe A. 2015;54(5):703–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J, Nguan C, Nott L, Luke PP, Pautler SE. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol. 2010;24(9):1447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G, Sangalli M, Scapaticci E, Fabbri F, Lazzeri M, Rigatti P, Guazzoni G. Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty in adults: techniques and results. Eur Urol. 2010;58(5):711–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schwentner C, Pelzer A, Neururer R, Springer B, Horninger W, Bartsch G. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre. BJU Int. 2007;100(4):880–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR, Thomas R. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience. J Urol. 2009;181(4):1751–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zeltser IS, Liu JB, Bagley DH. The incidence of crossing vessels in patients with normal ureteropelvic junction examined with endoluminal ultrasound. J Urol. 2004;172(6):2304–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (University of Delhi) & GTBH, New Delhi, India

    Iqbal Singh

  2. Department of Urology, Baptist Medical Centre, Wake Forest University Medical School, Medical Centre Boulevard, Winston Salem, NC, USA

    Iqbal Singh

  3. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Ashok K. Hemal

Authors
  1. Iqbal Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashok K. Hemal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok K. Hemal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Ashok K. Hemal

  2. Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA

    Mani Menon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, I., Hemal, A.K. (2018). Robot Assisted Pyeloplasty. In: Hemal, A., Menon, M. (eds) Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20644-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20645-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation