Abstract
The objective of this chapter is to provide an initial assessment of Facebook use by Western European municipalities considering two aspects: citizens’ engagement and municipalities’ activity. The sample for this study comprises the 15 earliest member countries of the EU represented by the five largest cities of each. Thus, data on 75 local governments are employed to test the following research questions: (1) How are Western European municipalities using Facebook? and (2) How are citizens engaging with their local government by using Facebook? In order to answer these questions, a set of metrics will be used that can help governments interpret and understand their impact in the use of social media. The answers to these questions will help to determine whether the use of social media is indeed increasing citizen participation in local governance. Results show that the use of Facebook by some of the biggest Western European local governments has become commonplace. Thus, the availability of a Facebook page is confirmed as a symbol of modernity and responsiveness, which may be perceived as particularly necessary for political legitimacy, especially in times of crisis. The audiences of the official Facebook pages of Western European municipalities are rather high. But a high number of fans does not automatically mean an engaged audience and citizen engagement, in general, is still low. Therefore, these findings suggest that the interest is limited on the part of citizens in terms of engaging in conversations with local governments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
According to Alexa rankings (Alexa.com 2014), the percentage of Facebook visitors that comes from Western European countries is as follows: Belgium (0.7 %), France (2.6 %), Germany (3.2 %), Greece (0.8 %), Italy (2.9 %), Netherlands (1 %), Portugal (0.5 %), Sweden (0.5 %), Spain (2.4) and the UK (3.2 %). No data are provided for Austria, Denmark, Finland, Ireland and Luxembourg, which are the smallest countries in our sample.
References
Agostino, D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 232–234.
Al-Debei, M. M., Al-Lozi, E., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2013). Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 43–54.
Alexa.com. (2014). Retrieved April 24, 2014, from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.
Bonsón, E., & Ratkai, M. (2013). A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review, 37(5), 787–803.
Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2014). Facebook practices in Western European municipalities: An empirical analysis of activity and citizens’ engagement. Administration and Society. doi:10.1177/0095399714544945
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132.
Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. (2010). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration & Society, 42(7), 836–858.
Bryer, T. A., & Zavattaro, S. M. (2011). Social media and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33, 325–340.
Cabinet Office. (2009). Template Twitter strategy for government departments. London: Government Cabinet Office.
Calder, B. J., Malthouse, E. C., & Schaedel, U. (2009). An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 321–331.
Chorianopoulos, I. (2002). Urban restructuring and governance: North-South differences in Europe and the EU URBAN initiative. Urban Studies, 39, 705–772. doi:10.1080/00420980220119534.
Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523–553.
Ellison, N., & Hardey, M. (2013). Developing political conversations? Information, Communication & Society, 16(6), 878–889.
Farazmand, A. (2012). The future of public administration: Challenges and opportunities—a critical Perspective. Administration & Society, 44(4), 487–517.
Hansard Society. (2009). MPs online: Connecting with constituents. London: Hansard Society.
Ho, A., & Ni, A. N. (2004). Explaining the adoption of e-government features: a case study of Iowa county treasurers’ offices. American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 164–180.
Joseph, R. C. (2012). E-Government meets social media: Realities and risks. IT Professional, 14(6), 9–15.
Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503.
Meijer, A., Koops, B. J., Pieterson, W., Overman, S., & ten Tije, S. (2012). Government 2.0: Key challenges to its realization. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(1), 59–69.
Mergel, I. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130.
Mergel, I., & Bretschneider, S. I. (2013). A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 390–400.
Michel, H. (2005). E-Administration, e-Government, e-Governance and the learning city: A typology of citizenship management using ICTs. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(4), 213–218.
Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. (2000). Designing web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy? Political Communication, 17(1), 1–19.
Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.
Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175.
Paek, H. J., Hove, T., Jung, Y., & Cole, R. T. (2013). Engagement across three social media platforms: An exploratory study of a cause-related PR campaign. Public Relations Review, 39, 526–533.
Pew Internet Research Center. (2013b). Social media update 2013. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
Pew Internet Research Centre. (2013a). The demographics of social media users—2012. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_SocialMediaUsers.pdf
Purser, K. (2012). Using social media in local government: 2011 Survey report. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Technology, Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Royo, S., Yetano, A., & Acerete, B. (2014). E-participation and environmental protection: Are local governments really committed? Public Administration Revie, 74(1), 87–98.
Schellong, A., & Girrger, P. (2010). Government 2.0 in betaphase a analysis of eParticipation and web 2.0 applications of Germany’s 50 largest cities and 16 federal states (Policy Paper Series). Wiesbaden: CSC.
Snead, J. T. (2013). Social media use in the U.S. executive branch. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 56–63.
The Economist. (2011). Latitude. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/11/euro-zone-economies
The European Institute. (2012). Europe’s North South divide—A stubborn chasm. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.europeaninstitute.org/EA-August-2012/europes-north-south-dividea-stubborn-chasm.html
Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280.
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.
Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-Governance developments in European Union cities: Reshaping government's relationship with citizens. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 19(2), 277–302.
Wright, S. (2009). Political blogs, representation and the public sphere. Aslib Proceedings, 61(2), 155–169.
Yetano, A., Royo, S., & Acerete, B. (2010). What is driving the increasing presence of citizen participation initiatives? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 783–802.
Zavattaro, S. M. (2013). Social media in public administration’s future: A response to Farazmand. Administration & Society, 45(2), 242–255.
Acknowledgement
This study has been carried out with the financial support of the Spanish National R&D Plan through research projects ECO2010-17463 and ECO2011-28267 (ECON-FEDER).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bonsón, E., Ratkai, M., Royo, S. (2016). Facebook Use in Western European Local Governments: An Overall View. In: Sobaci, M. (eds) Social Media and Local Governments. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17721-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17722-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)