Abstract
The city of Moscow is a leading implementer of information and communication technologies (ICT) in public services. The high level of ICT and mobile penetration among Muscovites creates a strong demand for mobile and electronic services.
This chapter will explore a case study involving the creation and development of Moscow’s integrated mobile platform (IMP). The case study illustrates ICT usage policy and the Moscow Government’s priorities in terms of delivering and providing access to mobile public services. The case study takes a framework approach to mobile platform development and is also based on the lean government concept. Key success factors in IMP development as well as challenges involved in the collaboration and coordination of various IMP stakeholders are also examined. The case study provides examples of mobile applications developed on the basis of the IMP. The governance decision-making process and regulatory framework for IMP management are examined as well. The IMP is interconnected with innovative front office systems such as the Moscow Public Services Portal and Open Data Portal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- DIT:
-
Department of Information Technologies
- HTTP:
-
Hyper Text Transfer Protocol
- ICT:
-
Information and communication technologies
- IMP:
-
Integrated mobile platform
- IT:
-
Information technologies
- J2EE:
-
Java 2 Enterprise Edition
- MMS:
-
Multimedia Messaging Service
- OECD:
-
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- PSP:
-
Public Services Portal
- SMS:
-
Short Messaging Service
- USSD:
-
Unstructured Supplementary Service Data
References
Antovski, L., & Gusev, M. (2005). M-Government framework. In Proceedings of Euro mGov 2005: The first European mobile government conference (pp. 36–44). Brighton, UK: Mobile Government Consortium International LLC.
Anttiroiko, A.-V., Valkama, P., & Bailey, S. (2013). Smart cities in a new economy: Building platforms for smart cities. AI & Society. doi:10.1007/s00146-013-0464-0.
Bailey, S. J. (2011). The evolving governance of public services in England: Extending competition, choice, co-design and coproduction. In A.-V. Anttiroiko, S. J. Bailey, & P. Valkama (Eds.), Innovations in public governance. (pp. 68–88). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bertot, J. C., & Choi, H. (2013). Big data and e-government: Issues, policies, and recommendations. In Sehl Mellouli, Luis F. Luna-Reyes, & Jing Zhang (Eds.), 14th annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 1–10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479730.
Borucki, C., Arat, S., & Kushchu, I. (2005). Mobile government and organizational effectiveness. In Proceedings of Euro mGov 2005: The first European mobile government conference (pp. 56–66). Brighton, UK: Mobile Government Consortium International LLC.
Bremer, A. A., & López Prado, L. A. (2006). Municipal m-services using SMS. In Proceedings of Euro mGov 2006: The second European conference on mobile government (pp. 45–50). Brighton: Mobile Government Consortium International LLC.
Cable, S. (2011). Profiles of the 2010–2012 citizen-engaged communities. Public Technology Institute Alexandria.
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2289–2297). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.
Internet Society. (2010) The internet ecosystem. www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/internetmodel.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2014.
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8.
Kim, H., Lee, H., & Choi, S. (2011). An exploratory study on the determinants of mobile application purchase. Journal of Society for E-Business Studies, 16(4), 173–195.
Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., & Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 5(1), 63–76.
Kushchu, I., & Kuscu, M. H. (2003). From E-Government to M-Government: Facing the inevitable. In Proceedings of European Conference on E-Government (ECEG 2003).
Minhee, C., Jinwoo, K., Hoyoung, K., & Hosung, R. (2001). Information quality for mobile internet services: A theoretical model with empirical validation. Electronic Markets, 12, 38–46.
OECD, & ITU. (2011). M-Government. Mobile technologies for responsive governments and connected societies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264118706-en.
Open Government Standard for Federal Authorities. (2013). http://xn-80abeamcuufxbhgound0h9cl.xn-p1ai/events/5508409/. Accessed 1 July 2014.
Pardo, T., & Nam, T. (2011). Smart City as Urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. Fifth International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV2011).
Renda, A. (2010). Neutrality and diversity in the internet ecosystem. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1680446. Accessed 26 April 2014.
Rossel, P., Finger, M., & Misuraca, G. (2006). ‘Mobile’ E-government options: Between technology-driven and user-centric. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 4, 79–86.
Sairamesh, J., Lee, A., & Anania, L. (2004). Information cities. Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 28–31.
Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environment. Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 153–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00016-8.
Sproull, L., & Patterson, J. F. (2004). Making information cities livable. Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 33–37.
United Nations E-Government Survey: E-Government for the People. (2012). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2014.
Wachhaus, T. A. (2011). Governance as a framework to support informatics. Innovation Journal, 16(1), 1–14.
Walravens, N. (2012). Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), 121–135. doi:10.4067/S0718-18762012000300011.
Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand ‘Smart City’ initiatives: Defining the Smart City, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge: Forrester Research http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Styrin, E., Kostyrko, A. (2016). Implementing Smart Services in Moscow: The Integrated Mobile Platform. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Nam, T. (eds) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17619-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17620-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)