Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Prolapse: Laparoscopic Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Techniques in Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery

  • 654 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical treatment of external rectal prolapse, internal intussusception (or internal rectal prolapse), and rectocele is still a challenging clinical problem in the field of colorectal surgery [1, 2]. These conditions may be associated with various pelvic floor disorders, including motility and morphological/functional disorders, ranging from constipation to fecal incontinence, thus significantly affecting the patients’ quality of life [3, 4]. A large variety of surgical procedures exists. The literature offers abundant publications, the main problem for an informed decision on the perfect surgical technique being an often large variability of patients’ selection, diagnostic assessment and variation within the same surgical technique and materials. As a consequence, the colorectal surgeon still lacks a standardized diagnostic assessment as well as a clear ideal surgical technique [5]. Perineal procedures, such as Delorme’s or perineal rectosigmoidectomy or stapled transanal rectal prolapse resection, are indicated for elderly and frail patients, who are not fit for an intervention under general anesthesia, but they have poor efficacy in terms of functional outcomes and recurrence, which may be up to 26 % [6], and also an increasing risk for postoperative incontinence [7]. Abdominal procedures, on the other side, either open or laparoscopic, employing rectal mobilization and fixation, colonic resection or a combination of both, show lower recurrence rates and better functional results, but may cause postoperative worsening of constipation, mostly due to the full rectal mobilization and the consequent possible autonomic nerve injury, which is responsible for dysmotility and impaired evacuation [8]. Laparoscopic ventral mesh recto(colpo)pexy has been introduced in order to obtain good results in terms of functional outcome of the abdominal procedures while avoiding postoperative constipation and incontinence, offering the advantages of anterolateral mobilization, mesh repair and of the laparoscopic approach compared to the open [9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Festen S, van Geloven AA, D’Hoore A, Lindsey I, Gerhards MF. Controversy in the treatment of symptomatic internal rectal prolapse: suspension or resection? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(6):2000–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. The assessment and management of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocoele, and enterocoele in adults. BMJ. 2011;342:c7099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wijffels NA, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Bemelman WA, Lindsey I. What are the symptoms of internal rectal prolapse? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(3):368–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic resection rectopexy. In t J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Madoff RD, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(4):441–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watts AM, Thompson MR. Evaluation of Delorme’s procedure as a treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2000;87(2):218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2, CD001758.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(1):41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):35–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith SR, Solomon M. Functional comparisons between open and laparoscopic rectopexy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010;34(10):505–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Reitano MC, Salamina G, Rosati R, Montorsi M, et al. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg. 1999;16(5):415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrne CM, Smith SR, Solomon MJ, Young JM, Eyers AA, Young CJ. Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(11):1597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P, Darzi A. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(10):1930–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cadeddu F, Sileri P, Grande M, De Luca E, Franceschilli L, Milito G. Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16(1):37–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Magruder JT, Efron JE, Wick EC, Gearhart SL. Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical-site infections and length of stay. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1110–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:561–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cutait D. Sacro-promontory fixation of the rectum for complete rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med. 1959;52:105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wexner SD. Rectopexy without mesh. In: Gaspari AL, Sileri P, editors. Pelvic floor disorders: surgical approach. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg. 1989;158(6):574–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose R, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Yildirim C, Bruch HPKJ, Barlehner E, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387:130–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Siproudhis L, Bellisant E, Jugeut F. Rectal adaptation to distention in patients with overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1527–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson J, Engledow A, Crosbie J, Arulampalam T, Motson R. Laparoscopic nonresectional suture rectopexy in the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse: substantive retrospective series. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1062–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex mesh rectopexy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:143–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholas RJ, Kamm KA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence; results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1431–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland TL. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carter AE. Retro sacral suture fixation for complete prolapse rectum in the elderly, the frail and the demented. Br J Surg. 1983;70:522–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frykman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;129(6):1225–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lechaux JP, Atienza P, Goasguen N, Lechaux D, Bars I. Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg. 2001;182(5):465–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stevenson ARL, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:46–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xynos E, Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Epanomeritakis E, Vassilakis J-S. Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:862–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roblick UJ, Bader FG, Jungbluth T, Laubert T, Bruch HP. How to do it—laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(6):851–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Husa A, Sainio P, von Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand. 1988;154(3):221–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Järvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7:219–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Infantino A. Mesh rectopexy (Ripstein, Orr-Loygue, Wells, Frykman-Goldberg). In: Gaspari AL, Sileri P, editors. Pelvic floor disorders: surgical approach. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen CC, Ridgeway B, Paraiso MF. Biologic grafts and synthetic meshes in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50:383–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shah BC, Tiwari MM, Goede MR, et al. Not all biologics are equal! Hernia. 2011;15:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Loygue J, Nordlinger B, Cunci O, Malafosse M, Hugue C, Parc R. Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:356–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(6):504–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1919–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Abet E, Lehur PA, Wong M. Sexual function and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complex rectocoele. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:721–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sileri P, Franceschilli L, De Luca E. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P. Synthetic or biologic mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy-a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:650–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Formijne Jonkers HA, Draaisma WA, Wexner SD, Broeders IA, Bemelman WA, Lindsey I, Consten EC. Evaluation and surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: an international survey. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(1):115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milsom JW, Oakley JR, Lavery IC. Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(5):501–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med. 1959;52:602–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Himpens J, Cadière GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M. Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:139–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Longo A, Boller B, Crafa F, Perrone F. Pelvic organ prolapse suspension. In: Gaspari AL, Sileri P, editors. Pelvic floor disorders: surgical approach. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ceci F, Spaziani E, Corelli S. Technique and outcomes about a new laparoscopic procedure: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Suspension (POPS). G Chir. 2013;34(5-6):141–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(11):1825–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mantoo S, Podevin J, Regenet N, Rigaud J, Lehur PA, Meurette G. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(8):e469–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Germain A, Perrenot C, Scherrer ML, Ayav C, Brunaud L, Ayav A, Bresler L. Long-term outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(3):198–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79(6):553–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

    Pierpaolo Sileri M.D., Ph.D., Luana Franceschilli M.D., Ilaria Capuano M.D., Federica Giorgi M.D. & Gabriele Boehm M.D.

Authors
  1. Pierpaolo Sileri M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luana Franceschilli M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilaria Capuano M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Federica Giorgi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriele Boehm M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierpaolo Sileri M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA

    Alessio Pigazzi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sileri, P., Franceschilli, L., Capuano, I., Giorgi, F., Boehm, G. (2018). Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Prolapse: Laparoscopic Procedures. In: Pigazzi, A. (eds) Techniques in Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16381-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16381-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16380-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16381-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation