Abstract
In this chapter, two ideal types of practitioners who may use or create policy informatics projects, programs, or platforms are introduced: the policy informatics-savvy public manager and the policy informatics analyst. Drawing from our experiences in teaching an informatics-friendly graduate curriculum, we discuss the range of learning competencies needed for traditional public managers and policy informatics-oriented analysts to thrive in an era of informatics. The chapter begins by describing the two different types of students who are, or can be touched by, policy informatics-friendly competencies, skills, and attitudes. Competencies ranging from those who may be users of policy informatics and sponsors of policy informatics projects and programs to those analysts designing and executing policy informatics projects and programs will be addressed. The chapter concludes with an illustration of how one Master of Public Administration (MPA) program with a policy informatics-friendly mission, a core curriculum that touches on policy informatics applications, and a series of program electives that allows students to develop analysis and modeling skills, designates its informatics-oriented competencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Argyis C, Schön DA (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Bryson J (2011) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Caiden N (1981) Public budgeting and finance. Blackwell, New York
Castle J (2014) Visualizing natural gas industry contributions in Pennsylvania Government, PA 317 final class project
Desouza KC (2014) Realizing the promise of big data: implementing big data projects. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Fact 37(1):32–64
Fernandez L (2013) An ESRD system dynamics population model for the United States. Final project for PA 308
Hur Y, Hackbart M (2009) MPA vs. MPP: a distinction without a difference? J Public Aff Educ 15(4):397–424
Katz D, Khan R (1978) The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New York
Kingdon J (1984) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Harper Collins, New York
Koliba C, Zia A (2013) Complex systems modeling in public administration and policy studies: challenges and opportunities for a meta-theoretical research program. In: Gerrits L, Marks PK (eds) COMPACT I: public administration in complexity. Emergent, Litchfield Park
Koliba C, Meek J, Zia A (2010) Governance networks in public administration and public policy. CRC, Boca Raton
Koliba C, Zia A, Lee B (2011) Governance informatics: utilizing computer simulation models to manage complex governance networks. Innov J Innov Publ Sect 16(1):1–26 (Article 3). (http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/koliba_governance_informaticsv16i1a3.pdf)
Korton DC (2001) The management of social transformation. In: Stivers C (ed) Democracy, bureaucracy, and the study of administration. Westview, Boulder, pp 476–497
Loorbach D (2007) Transition management: new modes of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Ultrecht
Mergel I (2013) Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Gov Inf Quart 30(2):123–130
Moynihan DP (2008) The dynamics of performance management: constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
O’Leary R, Bingham L (eds) (2009) The collaborative public manager: new ideas for the twenty-first century. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Patton M (2008) Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage, New York
Schick A (1966) The road to PPB: the stages of budget reform. Public Admin Rev 26(4):243–259
Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday Currency, New York
Stacey RD (2001) Complex responsive processes in organizations: learning and knowledge creation. Routledge, London
Willoughby WF (1918) The movement of budgetary reform in the states. D. Appleton, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: University of Vermont’s MPA Program Learning Competencies and Capacities
Appendix A: University of Vermont’s MPA Program Learning Competencies and Capacities
NASPAA core standard | UVM-MPA learning capacity |
---|---|
To lead and manage in public governance | Capacity to understand accountability and democratic theory |
Capacity to manage the lines of authority for public, private, and nonprofit collaboration, and to address sectorial differences to overcome obstacles | |
Capacity to apply knowledge of system dynamics and network structures in PA practice | |
Capacity to carry out effective policy implementation | |
To participate in and contribute to the policy process | Capacity to apply policy streams, cycles, systems foci upon past, present, and future policy issues, and to understand how problem identification impacts public administration |
Capacity to conduct policy analysis/evaluation | |
Capacity to employ quantitative and qualitative research methods for program evaluation and action research | |
To analyze, synthesize, think critically, solve problems, and make decisions | Capacity to initiate strategic planning, and apply organizational learning and development principles |
Capacity to apply sound performance measurement and management practices | |
Capacity to apply sound financial planning and fiscal responsibility | |
Capacity to employ quantitative and qualitative research methods for program evaluation and action research | |
To articulate and apply a public service perspective | Capacity to understand the value of authentic citizen participation in PA practice |
Capacity to understand the value of social and economic equity in PA practices | |
Capacity to lead in an ethical and reflective manner | |
Capacity to achieve cooperation through participatory practices | |
To communicate and interact productively with a diverse and changing workforce and citizenry | Capacity to undertake high quality oral, written, and electronically mediated communication and utilize information systems and media to advance objectives |
Capacity to appreciate the value of pluralism, multiculturalism, and cultural diversity | |
Capacity to carry out effective human resource management | |
Capacity to undertake high quality oral, written, and electronically mediated communication and utilize information systems and media to advance objectives |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koliba, C., Zia, A. (2015). Educating Public Managers and Policy Analysts in an Era of Informatics. In: Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., Deljoo, A. (eds) Policy Practice and Digital Science. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12783-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12784-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)