Skip to main content

The Role of Microsimulation in the Development of Public Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Practice and Digital Science

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 10))

Abstract

This chapter seeks to provide a brief introduction to the method of microsimulation and its utility for the development of public policy. Since the inception of microsimulation in the 1950s, its use for policy purposes has extended from the economic to other domains as data availability and technological advances have burgeoned. There has also been growing demand in recent times to address increasingly complex policy issues that require new approaches. Microsimulation focuses on modelling individual units and the micro-level processes that affect their development, be they people’s lives or other trajectories. It comes in various types, for example along the dimensions of arithmetical or behavioural, and static or dynamic. It has its own distinctive model-building process, which relies on empirical data and derived parameters with an insertion of chance to simulate realistic distributions. The particular utility of microsimulation for policy development lies in its ability to combine multiple sources of information in a single contextualised model to answer ‘what if’ questions on complex social phenomena and issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson RE, Hicks C (2011) Highlights of contemporary microsimulation. Soc Sci Comput Rev 29(1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon F, Spadaro A (2006) Microsimulation as a tool for evaluating redistribution policies. J Econ Inequal 4:77–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown L, Harding A (2002) Social modeling and public policy: application of microsimulation modeling in Australia. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(4):6

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, Kuntz KM (2012) Modelling good research practices—overview: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1. Med Decis Making 32:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassells R, Harding A, Kelly S (2006) Problems and prospects for dynamic microsimulation: A review and lessons for APPSIM. Discussion Paper no. 63. National Centre for Social and Economic Modeling, University of Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Citro CF, Hanusek EA (eds) (1991) The uses of microsimulation modeling, vol 1. Review and recommendations. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Gilbert N, Bonelli G, Cioffi-Revilla C, Deffuant G, Kertesz J, Loreto V, Moat S, Nadal J-P, Sanchez A, Nowak A, Flache A, San Miguel M, Helbing D (2012) Manifesto of computational social science. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214:325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Pearson J (2010) Using micro-simulation to create a synthesized data set and test policy options: the case of health service effects under demographic ageing. Health Policy 97:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Shannon FT, Lawton JM (1989) The Christchurch Child Development Study: A review of epidemiological findings. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 3:278–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb SJ, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ (2012) Childhood family income and life outcomes in adulthood: findings from a 30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand. Soc Sci Med 74:1979–1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N, Troitzsch K (2005) Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Glied S, Tilipman N (2010) Simulation modeling of health care policy. Annu Rev Publ Health 31:439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw M, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE (2012) Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 7:50 doi:10.1186/1748–5908-7–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Harding A (eds) (2007) Modelling our future: population ageing, health and aged care. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Kapur V (eds) (2000) Microsimulation in government policy and forecasting. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding A (ed) (1996) Microsimulation and public policy. Contributions to Economic Analysis Series. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding A, Gupta A (eds) (2007) Modelling our future: population ageing, social security and taxation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay-Yee R, Milne B, Davis P, Pearson J, McLay J (Inpress) Determinants and disparities: a simulation approach to the case of child health care. Social Science and Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, O’Donoghue C (2012) A methodological survey of dynamic microsimulation models. UNU-Merit Working Paper #2012–002. Maastricht University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobb R, Colditz GA (2013) Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu Rev Publ Health 34:235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion O, Lay-Yee R, Wrapson W, Davis P, Pearson J (2012) JAMSIM: a microsimulation modeling policy tool. J Artifi Soc Soc Simul 15(1):8. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/1/8.html Accessed 18 Dec 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini A, Trivellato U (1997) The role of survey data in microsimulation models for social policy analysis. Labour 11(1):83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay J, Lay-Yee R, Milne B, Davis P. Statistical modelling techniques for dynamic microsimulation: An empirical performance assessment. Unpublished manuscript under review

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz J (1991) Microsimulation—A survey of principles, developments and applications. Intern J Forecast 7(1):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne BJ, Lay-Yee R, McLay J, Tobias M, Tuohy P, Armstrong A, Lynn R, Davis P, Pearson J, Mannion O (2014) A collaborative approach to bridging the research-policy gap through the development of policy advice software. Evidence Policy 10(1):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitton L, Sutherland H, Weeks M (2000) Microsimulation modelling for policy analysis: challenges and innovations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue C (2001) Dynamic microsimulation: A survey. Brazilian Electronic J Econ 4(2):77

    Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt G (1957) A new type of socio-economic system. Rev Econ Stat 39(2):116–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percival R (2007) APPSIM—Software selection and data structures. Working Paper. National Centre for Social and Economic Modeling, University of Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org Accessed 18 Dec 2014

  • Ringel JS, Eibner C, Girosi F, Cordova A, McGlynn EA (2010) Modeling health care policy alternatives. Health Serv Res 45:1541–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter CM, Zaslavsky AM, Feuer EJ (2011) Dynamic microsimulation models for health outcomes. Med Decis Making 31(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2013) SAS 9.2. 2014. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sas.com. Accessed 18 Dec 2014

  • Scott A (2003) A computing strategy for SAGE: 2. Programming considerations. Technical Note no. 3. Citeseer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar O, Irwin AA (2010) A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization, Geneva. Discussion paper 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielauer M. (2007) Dynamic microsimulation of health care demand, health care finance and the economic impact of health behaviours: survey and review. Intern J Microsimul 1(1):35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielauer M (2011) What is social science microsimulation? Soc Sci Comput Rev 29(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi A, Rake K (2001) Dynamic microsimulation models: A review and some lessons for SAGE. Discussion Paper no. 2. Citeseer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi A, Harding A, Williamson P (eds) (2009) New frontiers in microsimulation modeling. Public policy and social welfare, vol 36. Ashgate, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchelli E, Jones AM, Rice N (2012) The evaluation of health policies through dynamic microsimulation methods. Intern J Microsimul 5(1):2–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Modelling the Early Life Course (MEL-C) project was funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Data were made available by the Christchurch Health and Development Study, University of Otago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy Lay-Yee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Examples of Usage for Policy

This section highlights a number of existing microsimulation models used for policy purposes. The list is not intended to be exhaustive, merely to provide an indication of the broad sweep of models in use across various domains and countries. There are useful reviews and compendia of existing microsimulation models that describe their features in more detail (for example: Li and O’Donoghue 2012; O’Donoghue 2001).

APPSIM (Australian Population and Policy Simulation Model)

APPSIM, developed by the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM), is a dynamic model which simulates the life cycle of 200,000 individuals (1 % sample of census) from 2001 to 2050. It shows how the Australian population develops over time under various scenarios, and allows the social and fiscal impacts of policy changes over time to be simulated.

URL: http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/models/appsim/

EUROMOD (Europe)

EUROMOD, based at the Institute for Social & Economic Research, University of Essex, is a static tax-benefit model for the European Union (2000s). It enables researchers and policy analysts to calculate, in a comparable manner, the effects of taxes and benefits on household incomes and work incentives for the population of each country and for the European Union as a whole.

URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/euromod/

FEM (Future Elderly Model—USA)

FEM, developed by the RAND Roybal Center for Health Policy Simulation, is a demographic and economic simulation model designed to predict the future costs and health status of the elderly and explore the implications for policy. It uses a representative sample of 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and over drawn from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys. Each beneficiary in the sample is linked to Medicare claims records to track actual medical care use and costs over time.

URL: http://www.rand.org/labor/roybalhp/projects/health_status/fem.html

LIFEPATHS (Canada)

LIFEPATHS, developed by Statistics Canada, is a dynamic model of individuals and families from an 1872 birth cohort, to today. It creates synthetic life histories from birth to death that are representative of the history of Canada’s population. It can be used to evaluate government programmes, or to analyse societal issues of a longitudinal nature, e.g. intergenerational equity.

URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/microsimulation/lifepaths/lifepaths-eng.htm

MIDAS (Microsimulation for the Development of Adequacy and Sustainability—Belgium, Germany, Italy)

MIDAS is a dynamic population model. Starting from a cross-sectional dataset representing a population of all ages at a certain point in time (early 2000s), the life spans of individuals are simulated over time. So new individuals are born, go through school, marry or cohabit, enter the labour market, divorce, retire, and finally, die. During their active years, they build up pension rights, which result in a pension benefit when they retire.

URL: http://www.plan.be/publications/Publication_det.php?lang=en&TM=30&KeyPub=781

POHEM (Population Health Model—Canada)

POHEM is a dynamic microsimulation model intended to represent the lifecycle dynamics of the population. The simulation creates and ages a large sample until death. The life trajectory of each simulated person unfolds by exposure to different health events. The model combines data from a wide range of sources, including cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys, cancer registries, hospitalisation databases, vital statistics, census data, and treatment cost data as well as parameters in the published literature.

URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/microsimulation/health-sante/health-sante-eng.htm#a2

SADNAP (Social Affairs Department of the Netherlands Ageing and Pensions)

SADNAP is a dynamic microsimulation model for estimating the financial and economic implications of an ageing population and evaluating the redistributive effects of policy options. It simulates the life paths of a sample of the Dutch population using transition probabilities on demographic events. The model uses administrative data sets on pension entitlements and payments.

URL:http://ima.natsem.canberra.edu.au/IJM/V4_1/Volume%204%20Issue%201/5_IJM2011_van_Sonsbeek_CORRECTED_GD_JMS.pdf

STINMOD (Static Incomes Model—Australia)

STINMOD is a static microsimulation model of Australia’s income tax and transfer system, developed by NATSEM. The model is mostly used to analyse the distributional and individual impacts of income tax and income support policies and to estimate the fiscal and distributional impacts of policy reform.

URL: http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/models/stinmod/

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lay-Yee, R., Cotterell, G. (2015). The Role of Microsimulation in the Development of Public Policy. In: Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., Deljoo, A. (eds) Policy Practice and Digital Science. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics