Skip to main content

The RENAULT Ergonomic Assessment Method V3: Comparing Results with the OCRA Checklist and the Strain Index Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1207))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Work related Musculoskeletal disorders affect millions of workers in Europe and cost employers billions of Euros. Concerned about this problematic, the Renault Group has developed methodologies to assess the risks associated with jobs that integrate repetitive tasks such as the Ergonomic Assessment Method V3 (EAM-v3). Bearing in mind that the assessment of certain jobs by the EAM-v3 does not seem to fully reflect the concerns and the complaints reported by the operators performing them, it seemed appropriate to evaluate these jobs with other methods available in the literature. The main objective of this study was to compare the EAM-v3 results with those obtained with the OCRA Checklist Index (OCRA) and the Strain Index (SI). Five workstations were selected and assessed with the three methods aforementioned. The results obtained showed that in 60% of the evaluated cases, the EAM-v3 was robust enough to reflect the concerns of the respective workers, since the results obtained were, at least, similar or even higher than those obtained by the OCRA and SI methods. In 40% of the cases, the EAM-v3 was less protective resulting in lower risk levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DGS: Lesões Musculoesqueléticas Relacionadas com o Trabalho: Guia de Orientação para a Prevenção. Programa Nac. Contra as Doenças Reumáticas, 28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nunes, I.: Ergonomic risk assessment methodologies for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a patent overview (2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874764710902020121

  3. Carnide, F., et al.: Doenças Reumáticas em Contexto Ocupacional: Fatores de Risco (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. EU-OSHA: OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU-Facts and figures. European Risk Observatory Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010). https://doi.org/10.2802/10952

  5. Bernard, B.P., (ed.): Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. NIOSH, Cincinnati (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Renault: GE75-025R - Methode d’analyse ergonomique pour les activités répétitives - guide d’utilisation (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Occhipinti, E., Colombini, D.: The Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) methods: OCRA index and OCRA checklist. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 15-1–15-13. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moore, J.S., Vos, G.A.: The strain index. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 9-1–9-5. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. da Silva, S.M.M.: Estudo comparativo do método de Avaliação Ergonómico V3 Renault com outros métodos de avaliação do risco de LMERT. Dissertação de mestrado em Ergonomia. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roman-Liu, D.: Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment. Appl. Ergon. 45(3), 420–427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiasson, M.E., et al.: Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(5), 478–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Antonucci, A.: Comparative analysis of three methods of risk assessment for repetitive movements of the upper limbs: OCRA index, ACGIH (TLV), and strain index. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 70, 9–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Serranheira, F., Uva, A.S.: Work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (WRULMSDS) risk assessment : different tools, different results!: What Are We Measring? Med. Segur. Trab. LIV, 212, 35–44 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipa Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carvalho, F., Silva, S., Melo, R.B. (2020). The RENAULT Ergonomic Assessment Method V3: Comparing Results with the OCRA Checklist and the Strain Index Methods. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51368-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51369-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics