Abstract
Work related Musculoskeletal disorders affect millions of workers in Europe and cost employers billions of Euros. Concerned about this problematic, the Renault Group has developed methodologies to assess the risks associated with jobs that integrate repetitive tasks such as the Ergonomic Assessment Method V3 (EAM-v3). Bearing in mind that the assessment of certain jobs by the EAM-v3 does not seem to fully reflect the concerns and the complaints reported by the operators performing them, it seemed appropriate to evaluate these jobs with other methods available in the literature. The main objective of this study was to compare the EAM-v3 results with those obtained with the OCRA Checklist Index (OCRA) and the Strain Index (SI). Five workstations were selected and assessed with the three methods aforementioned. The results obtained showed that in 60% of the evaluated cases, the EAM-v3 was robust enough to reflect the concerns of the respective workers, since the results obtained were, at least, similar or even higher than those obtained by the OCRA and SI methods. In 40% of the cases, the EAM-v3 was less protective resulting in lower risk levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
DGS: Lesões Musculoesqueléticas Relacionadas com o Trabalho: Guia de Orientação para a Prevenção. Programa Nac. Contra as Doenças Reumáticas, 28 (2008)
Nunes, I.: Ergonomic risk assessment methodologies for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a patent overview (2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874764710902020121
Carnide, F., et al.: Doenças Reumáticas em Contexto Ocupacional: Fatores de Risco (2013)
EU-OSHA: OSH in figures: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU-Facts and figures. European Risk Observatory Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010). https://doi.org/10.2802/10952
Bernard, B.P., (ed.): Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. NIOSH, Cincinnati (1997)
Renault: GE75-025R - Methode d’analyse ergonomique pour les activités répétitives - guide d’utilisation (2002)
Occhipinti, E., Colombini, D.: The Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) methods: OCRA index and OCRA checklist. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 15-1–15-13. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
Moore, J.S., Vos, G.A.: The strain index. In: Stanton, N., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods, pp. 9-1–9-5. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
da Silva, S.M.M.: Estudo comparativo do método de Avaliação Ergonómico V3 Renault com outros métodos de avaliação do risco de LMERT. Dissertação de mestrado em Ergonomia. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa (2019)
Roman-Liu, D.: Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment. Appl. Ergon. 45(3), 420–427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.010
Chiasson, M.E., et al.: Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(5), 478–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003
Antonucci, A.: Comparative analysis of three methods of risk assessment for repetitive movements of the upper limbs: OCRA index, ACGIH (TLV), and strain index. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 70, 9–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.005
Serranheira, F., Uva, A.S.: Work-related upper limb musculoskeletal disorders (WRULMSDS) risk assessment : different tools, different results!: What Are We Measring? Med. Segur. Trab. LIV, 212, 35–44 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carvalho, F., Silva, S., Melo, R.B. (2020). The RENAULT Ergonomic Assessment Method V3: Comparing Results with the OCRA Checklist and the Strain Index Methods. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51368-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51369-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)